Peer support in anaesthesia: development and implementation of a peer-support programme within the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine

Recent years have seen a shift in culture surrounding psychological wellbeing in doctors. As suicide continues to devastate medical families, friends and colleagues across the country, and significant rates of mental health issues persist, a greater focus on doctors' psychological health has emerged. This, coupled with mounting evidence in favour of peer support, has driven the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine to implement a unique peer support programme, which has been tailored to the needs of the perioperative environment. The programme provides a peer-driven, confidential, psychological safety net for all Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital anaesthetic staff. It focuses on collegial support in times of stress, as well as promoting a workplace culture of understanding for staff suffering psychological strain. The benefit of a formalised programme of this kind is that while staff have the option to obtain support at any time from a responder of their choosing, they do not need to seek it out actively in the event of a critical incident when it is automatically provided to them. Consultant anaesthetists trained in psychological first aid act as responders, offering support as well as resources and psychologist referral as required. It is our hope that its success will prompt other anaesthetic departments to continue the trend towards positive health strategies for doctors and implement similar programmes

The gold in garbage: implementing a waste segregation and recycling initiative

Generally, ORs produce approximately one-fifth to one-third of all waste in a hospital. Before our quality improvement project was performed in our tertiary care facility, all OR waste was disposed of as clinical waste. Disposal of clinical waste is more costly than disposal of general waste. Therefore, accurately segregating waste can have significant financial incentives. Our quality improvement project involved the implementation of processes that segregated general waste in the OR from clinical waste and translated to an almost 60% reduction of waste disposal costs for OR waste. Further, we implemented a recycling program that reclaimed a portion of the general waste. In total, our efforts reduced the amount of clinical waste produced by the OR by 82%, and the amount of total OR waste was reduced by more than 50%. AORN J 103 (March 2016) 316. e1-316. e8. (C) AORN, Inc, 2016

Operating room greening initiatives – the old, the new, and the way forward: a narrative review

Healthcare waste is a rampant issue in Australian hospitals. The operating room (OR) contributes disproportionately to total hospital waste. There has been considerable research in the literature concentrating on strategies to improve OR and hospital waste accumulation, in an attempt to provide guidance and direction on how to reduce the healthcare ecological footprint. We reviewed the literature for leading greening initiatives currently utilised in the OR in Australia and internationally. This narrative literature review focuses on the trend of OR greening initiatives over the last 25 years, comparing different innovative approaches, the successes and setbacks, and the financial implications of initiatives. A variety of measures that hospital management, surgeons, anaesthetists, nurses and other healthcare personnel can take to reduce the ecological footprint of their healthcare facility are outlined. Greening initiatives include reducing, recycling, reusing, rethinking and researching, as well as novel technology and smarter architectural design. We also evaluated the barriers to improving waste management, which include lack of leadership, misconceptions among staff, and an overall resistance to change. In conclusion, in a world where greenhouse gas emissions cause unprecedented climate change and landfill space is finite, it is incumbent upon hospitals to help reduce the environmental impact of their facility. Reducing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions would moderate the incidence of human disease, save money for the healthcare system and society as a whole, and contribute to a safer and healthier world we all would like to live in

A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®

The laryngeal mask airways supreme (LMA-Supreme™) and protector (LMA-Protector™) are generally placed blindly, often resulting in a less than optimal position and vision-guided placement has been recommended. This prospective, randomized controlled study compared the efficacy of airway seal by measuring the oropharyngeal leak pressure in 100 surgical patients who underwent a variety of non-thoracic surgery under general anaesthesia, suitable with a supraglottic airway device. Patients were allocated to either the LMA-Supreme (n = 50) or LMA-Protector (n = 50) group. All insertions were performed under vision of a videolaryngoscope using an ‘insert-detect-correct-as-you-go’ technique with standardized corrective measures. Our primary endpoint, mean oropharyngeal leak pressure, was significantly higher in the LMA-Protector (31.7 ± 2.9\ua0cm H O) compared to the LMA-Supreme (27.7 ± 3.5 cm H O) group (mean difference 4.0 cm H O, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7–5.3 cm H O, p < 0.001) after achieving a near-optimal fibreoptic position in the LMA-Protector (94%) and LMA-Supreme (96%) groups. No statistically significant differences were shown for secondary outcomes of alignment, number of insertion attempts and malpositions, and final anatomical position as scored by fibreoptic evaluation. Corrective manoeuvres were required in virtually all patients to obtain a correct anatomically positioned LMA. Position outcomes of the two devices were similar except for the proportion of procedures with folds in the proximal cuff (90% LMA-Supreme vs. 2% LMA-Protector, p < 0.001), the need for intracuff pressure adjustments (80% LMA-Supreme vs. 48% LMA-Protector, p = 0.001) and size correction (18% LMA-Supreme vs. 4% LMA-Protector, p = 0.025). In conclusion, a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure can be achieved with LMA-Protector compared to LMA-Supreme with optimal anatomical position when insertion is vision-guided

The influence of obesity on coagulation in healthy term pregnancy as assessed by rotational thromboelastometry

Background: Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a point-of-care coagulation test which has been used to demonstrate hypercoagulability in pregnant populations and obese populations. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the combined effect of pregnancy and obesity on coagulation using ROTEM in healthy pregnant women of varying body mass indices (BMIs) presenting for elective caesarean delivery. Materials and Methods: Ethics approval was granted for recruitment of women presenting for elective caesarean delivery. Women with any condition affecting coagulation were excluded. The ROTEM parameters of extrinsically activated thromboelastometric test / fibrin polymerisation test (EXTEM/FIBTEM) amplitude at five minutes (A5), coagulation time (CT), maximum clot firmness (MCF) and clot formation time (CFT) were compared between three different groups: normal weight, overweight and obese women. Results: One hundred and eighty-five women presenting for elective caesarean delivery met inclusion criteria and were divided into three groups; normal weight (BMI\ua