sj-pdf-7-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 – Supplemental material for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-7-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement by Catrin Evans, Georgia Clancy, Kerry Evans, Andrew Booth, Benash Nazmeen, Stephen Timmons, Candice Sunney, Mark Clowes, Nia Wyn Jones and Helen Spiby in Journal of Research in Nursing</p

sj-pdf-5-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 – Supplemental material for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-5-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement by Catrin Evans, Georgia Clancy, Kerry Evans, Andrew Booth, Benash Nazmeen, Stephen Timmons, Candice Sunney, Mark Clowes, Nia Wyn Jones and Helen Spiby in Journal of Research in Nursing</p

sj-pdf-6-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 – Supplemental material for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-6-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement by Catrin Evans, Georgia Clancy, Kerry Evans, Andrew Booth, Benash Nazmeen, Stephen Timmons, Candice Sunney, Mark Clowes, Nia Wyn Jones and Helen Spiby in Journal of Research in Nursing</p

sj-pdf-8-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 – Supplemental material for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-8-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement by Catrin Evans, Georgia Clancy, Kerry Evans, Andrew Booth, Benash Nazmeen, Stephen Timmons, Candice Sunney, Mark Clowes, Nia Wyn Jones and Helen Spiby in Journal of Research in Nursing</p

sj-pdf-4-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 – Supplemental material for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-4-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement by Catrin Evans, Georgia Clancy, Kerry Evans, Andrew Booth, Benash Nazmeen, Stephen Timmons, Candice Sunney, Mark Clowes, Nia Wyn Jones and Helen Spiby in Journal of Research in Nursing</p

sj-pdf-3-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 – Supplemental material for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-3-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement by Catrin Evans, Georgia Clancy, Kerry Evans, Andrew Booth, Benash Nazmeen, Stephen Timmons, Candice Sunney, Mark Clowes, Nia Wyn Jones and Helen Spiby in Journal of Research in Nursing</p

sj-pdf-1-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 – Supplemental material for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement by Catrin Evans, Georgia Clancy, Kerry Evans, Andrew Booth, Benash Nazmeen, Stephen Timmons, Candice Sunney, Mark Clowes, Nia Wyn Jones and Helen Spiby in Journal of Research in Nursing</p

sj-pdf-2-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 – Supplemental material for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-2-jrn-10.1177_17449871241226911 for Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement by Catrin Evans, Georgia Clancy, Kerry Evans, Andrew Booth, Benash Nazmeen, Stephen Timmons, Candice Sunney, Mark Clowes, Nia Wyn Jones and Helen Spiby in Journal of Research in Nursing</p

Outcome domains and outcome measures used in included studies.

Outcome domains and outcome measures used in included studies.</p

PRISMA checklist.

BackgroundHealthcare services regularly receive patient feedback, most of which is positive. Empirical studies suggest that health services can use positive feedback to create patient benefit. Our aim was to map all available empirical evidence for how positive patient feedback creates change in healthcare settings.MethodsEmpirical studies in English were systematically identified through database searches (ACM Digital Library, AMED, ASSIA, CINAHL, MEDLINE and PsycINFO), forwards and backwards citation, and expert consultation. We summarise the characteristics of included studies and the feedback they consider, present a thematic synthesis of qualitative findings, and provide narrative summaries of quantitative findings.Results68 papers were included, describing research conducted across six continents, with qualitative (n = 51), quantitative (n = 10), and mixed (n = 7) methods. Only two studies were interventional. The most common settings were hospitals (n = 27) and community healthcare (n = 19). The most common recipients were nurses (n = 29). Most outcomes described were desirable. These were categorised as (a) short-term emotional change for healthcare workers (including feeling motivated and improved psychological wellbeing); (b) work-home interactional change for healthcare workers (such as improved home-life relationships); (c) work-related change for healthcare workers (such as improved performance and staff retention). Some undesirable outcomes were described, including envy when not receiving positive feedback. The impact of feedback may be moderated by characteristics of particular healthcare roles, such as night shift workers having less interaction time with patients. Some factors moderating the change created by feedback are modifiable.ConclusionFurther interventional research is required to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of receiving positive feedback in creating specific forms of change such as increases in staff retention. Healthcare managers may wish to use positive feedback more regularly, and to address barriers to staff receiving feedback.</div