Osteodiscus abyssicola, a new snailfish (Cottoidei: Liparidae) collected off the Pacific coast of northern Japan

Murasaki, Kenta, Kai, Yoshiaki, Endo, Hiromitsu, Fukui, Atsushi (2021): Osteodiscus abyssicola, a new snailfish (Cottoidei: Liparidae) collected off the Pacific coast of northern Japan. Zootaxa 5032 (1): 136-142, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5032.1.

Osteodiscus Stein 1978

Key to species of Osteodiscus 1a. Mouth distinctly oblique, principal caudal-fin rays 9............................................. O. rhepostomias 1b. Mouth horizontal, principal caudal-fin rays 6–8............................................................. 2 2a. Pectoral fin unnotched, teeth blunt, anal-fin rays 46–49............................................ O. andriashevi 2b. Pectoral fin notched, teeth sharp, anal-fin rays 39–44......................................................... 3 3a. Pelvic disk to anus about 1–4 % HL, pyloric caeca absent............................................ O. cascadiae 3b. Pelvic disk to anus about 16% HL, pyloric caeca present..................................... O. abyssicola sp. nov.Published as part of Murasaki, Kenta, Kai, Yoshiaki, Endo, Hiromitsu & Fukui, Atsushi, 2021, Osteodiscus abyssicola, a new snailfish (Cottoidei: Liparidae) collected off the Pacific coast of northern Japan, pp. 136-142 in Zootaxa 5032 (1) on page 138, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/547775

Osteodiscus abyssicola Murasaki & Kai & Endo & Fukui 2021, sp. nov.

Osteodiscus abyssicola sp. nov. New Japanese name: Tsugomori-hariban-kusauo Figs. 1, 2; Table 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: D12C0636-D7A4-463A-A173-92E234C1D6E5 Holotype. NSMT-P 109986, 94.7 mm SL, immature female, south-southwest of Kushiro, Hokkaido, northern Japan; 41° 43.46′ N, 144° 53.63′ E – 41° 42.24′ N, 144° 52.12′ E; 4,671–4,744 m depth, 4 Aug. 1992, R / V Hakuho-maru. Diagnosis. A species of Osteodiscus distinguished from all currently recognized congeners by the following combination of characters: vertebrae 49; dorsal-fin rays 44; anal-fin rays 39; principal caudal-fin rays 8; pyloric caeca 5; mouth horizontal; teeth on both jaws simple and sharp, without cusps; upper and lower jaw symphyses without diastema; cephalic pore sizes moderate, similar to or slightly larger than nostril; gill slit extending ventrally to 2 nd pectoral-fin ray base; pectoral fin notched; mandibular symphysis to center of anus 101.6% HL; posterior edge of pelvic disk to center of anus 15.5% HL; epural 1, reduced; epipleural ribs absent. Description. Counts and measurements given in Table 1. Body slender, anteriorly oval in cross section, tapering gradually and becoming strongly compressed posteriorly, deepest at nape (= vertical depth through center of pelvic disk) (Fig. 1A, B). Skin thin, fragile (partly damaged); thin subdermal gelatinous layer present; prickles apparently absent. Head large, dorsal profile rounded from nape to snout. Snout blunt and deep, slightly projecting. Mouth subterminal, horizontal when closed, oral cleft extending to below center of orbit; outer margin of premaxilla completely covered by upper lip; posterior margin of maxilla slightly beyond to vertically below posterior margin of orbit. Lower jaw slightly inferior, anterior part of premaxillary tooth plates visible from ventral aspect of head; posterior half of outer margin of mandible covered by lower lip, anterior tip of lip slightly angled ventrally. Teeth on both jaws simple, sharp, without cusps, in about 20 oblique rows of 5–9 teeth forming bands, inner teeth larger than outer teeth (Fig. 2A). Upper and lower jaw symphyses without diastema. Single nostril tube-like, horizontally level with center of orbit. Eye and orbit small, dorsal contour of orbit below dorsal profile of head; pupil round. Cephalic pore sizes moderate, similar to or slightly larger than nostril: nasal pores 2, maxillary pores 6? [6th (= supraorbital) pore apparently present as shown in Fig. 1A, but difficult to discern due to poor skin condition], preoperculo-mandibular pores 7, suprabranchial pore 1; pore pattern 2-6?-7-1. Coronal pore absent. Chin pores (= anteriormost preoperculo-mandibular pores) paired, opening directly on skin surface, well separated from each other. Free neuromasts not apparent in damaged skin. Gill slit relatively short, upper margin horizontally level with lower margin of orbit, lower margin extending ventrally to 2 nd pectoral-fin ray base. Opercular flap angular, pointing posteroventrally, supported by two spines: upper spine (from opercle) and lower spine (from subopercle) extending posterior to vertical through dorsal-fin origin. Dorsal- and anal-fin rays not buried in gelatinous layer. Anteriormost and 2 nd pterygiophores of dorsal fin without rays, inserted between 3 rd and 4 th, and 4 th and 5 th neural spines, respectively. Anal-fin origin below 8 th dorsal-fin ray base. Hypural plates fused with terminal vertebral centrum, upper and lower plates separated by a narrow slit. Single reduced epural present. Pleural ribs and epipleural ribs absent. Pectoral fin moderately or deeply notched (condition unclear due to damage to some rays in notch and lower lobe, as shown in Fig. 1A). Upper lobe rays slightly protruding from membrane at tip; 2 nd and 3 rd uppermost rays longest, reaching to 4 th anal-fin ray base. Notch and lower lobe rays filamentous, nearly completely free from membrane. Uppermost pectoral-fin base just below level of posterior margin of maxilla; lowermost pectoral-fin base below anterior margin of orbit. Pelvic disk large, longer than wide, moderately upturned at posterior part; skeletal, musculature greatly reduced, fleshly margin absent (Fig. 2B). Basipterygia and six paired pelvic rays (anteriormost spine, posterior five soft rays) covered only by thin skin, internal structures visible through skin. Bases of anteriormost and 2 nd pelvic rays more widely spaced than bases of other rays; anteriormost ray supported by subpelvic process (= part of anterior half of basipterygium), posterior five rays supported by posterior half of basipterygium. Pelvic rays webbed between tips; webs somewhat attenuated posteriorly on disk. Anus well separated from posterior edge of pelvic disk, vertically below dorsal-fin origin. Minute genital papilla-like process at posterior of anus. Stomach and short pyloric caeca located on left side of visceral cavity. Color in alcohol. Body and fins brown, head somewhat darker (Fig. 1B). Eye and peritoneum black. Gill cavity dark brown. Stomach, pyloric caeca, and genital papilla-like process pale. Distribution. Western North Pacific, south-southwest of Kushiro, Hokkaido, northern Japan, at a depth of 4,671 –4,744 m. Etymology. The specific name “ abyssicola ”, a noun in apposition, is derived from Latin “abyssus” (abyss) and “cola” (dweller), referring to the deeper habitat of this species compared to congeners. The Japanese name “Tsugomori” is an archaic term in Japanese, modified from “tsuki-gomori” (hiding moon), and refers to a dark night. Comparisons. Osteodiscus abyssicola sp. nov. shares a horizontal mouth with two congeners, O. cascadiae and O. andriashevi (Stein 1978; Pitruk & Fedorov 1990; Murasaki et al. 2021; this study). However, O. abyssicola sp. nov. clearly differs from O. cascadiae in having 8 principal caudal-fin rays (vs. 6–7), 5 pyloric caeca (vs. 0), the anus well separated from the pelvic disk posterior edge (15.5% HL vs. immediately posterior to or slightly further from disk, 1–4 % HL), moderate-sized cephalic pores, similar to or slightly larger than nostril (vs. notably larger than nostril), absence of diastemata at both jaw symphyses (vs. present), and presence of a reduced epural (vs. absent) (Stein 1978, 2012; Kido 1988; this study). It also differs from O. andriashevi in having 49 vertebrae (vs. 55–60), 44 dorsal-fin rays (vs. 52–54), 39 anal-fin rays (vs. 46–49), 8 principal caudal-fin rays (vs. 7), sharp teeth without cusps (vs. blunt, some with lateral cusps), a notched pectoral fin (vs. unnotched), and the absence of epipleural ribs (vs. present) (Pitruk & Fedorov 1990; Murasaki et al. 2021; this study). Additionally, the space between the 1 st and 2 nd pelvic-fin ray bases is greater than between the other fin ray bases in O. abyssicola sp. nov. (vs. space between 2 nd and 3 rd ray bases greater than between others in O. cascadiae and O. andriashevi) (Stein 1978; Kido 1988; Pitruk & Fedorov 1990; this study). The remaining species, O. rhepostomias, has a distinctly oblique mouth (vs. horizontal in O. abyssicola sp. nov.), 9 principal caudal-fin rays (vs. 8), a shorter distance from mandible to anus, 68.2% HL (vs. 101.6% HL), a clear diastema at the lower jaw symphysis (vs. absent), and a large gill slit, extending ventrally to about 9 th pectoral-fin ray base (vs. small, extending to 2 nd pectoral-fin ray base) (Stein 2012; this study).Published as part of Murasaki, Kenta, Kai, Yoshiaki, Endo, Hiromitsu & Fukui, Atsushi, 2021, Osteodiscus abyssicola, a new snailfish (Cottoidei: Liparidae) collected off the Pacific coast of northern Japan, pp. 136-142 in Zootaxa 5032 (1) on pages 138-141, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/547775

A new species of snailfish of the genus Paraliparis (Liparidae) from the western North Pacific, with a redescription of the poorly known species Paraliparis mandibularis

A new snailfish, Paraliparis flammeus, is described on the basis of 18 specimens collected off the Pacific coast of Tohoku District, northern Japan at depths of 422–890 m. The new species is distinguished from 28 species of Paraliparis described from the North Pacific by the following combination of characters: mouth oblique; uppermost pectoral-fin base below horizontal through posterior margin of maxillary; 60–63 vertebrae, 54–58 dorsal-fin rays, 50 or 51 anal-fin rays, six principal caudal-fin rays, and 17–20 pectoral-fin rays. A maximum likelihood tree based on 106 COI gene sequences (492 bp) of Paraliparis recovered a monophyletic group comprising P. flammeus, Paraliparis cephalus, and Paraliparis dipterus. Paraliparis cephalus is similar to P. flammeus in having an oblique mouth, but it has four caudal-fin rays (vs six rays) and the uppermost pectoral-fin base above a horizontal through the maxillary posterior margin. Paraliparis dipterus differs from P. flammeus in having a horizontal mouth, 12–14 pectoral-fin rays, and lacking pyloric caeca (present in P. flammeus). Paraliparis flammeus is most similar to the eastern North Pacific Paraliparis mento in having an oblique mouth and the uppermost pectoral-fin base below a horizontal through the posterior margin of the maxillary. However, P. flammeus differs from P. mento in having six caudal-fin rays (vs five rays) and greater preanal length (29.9–35.3% SL vs 26.7–28.5% SL). A poorly known species, Paraliparis mandibularis, previously known from only two specimens collected from Tosa Bay, southern Japan, is redescribed based on the holotype and seven newly collected specimens. It is also similar to the new species but has 27–30 pectoral-fin rays and a shorter pectoral-fin lower lobe (13.8–15.9% SL in P. mandibularis vs 16.7–23.4% SL in P. flammeus)