The ability to induce heat shock transcription factor-regulated genes in response to lethal heat stress is associated with thermotolerance in tomato cultivars

Heat stress is a severe challenge for plant production, and the use of thermotolerant cultivars is critical to ensure stable production in high-temperature-prone environments. However, the selection of thermotolerant cultivars is difficult due to the complex nature of heat stress and the time and space needed for evaluation. In this study, we characterized genome-wide differences in gene expression between thermotolerant and thermosensitive tomato cultivars and examined the possibility of selecting gene expression markers to estimate thermotolerance among different tomato cultivars. We selected one thermotolerant and one thermosensitive cultivar based on physiological evaluations and compared heat-responsive gene expression in these cultivars under stepwise heat stress and acute heat shock conditions. Transcriptomic analyses reveled that two heat-inducible gene expression pathways, controlled by the heat shock element (HSE) and the evening element (EE), respectively, presented different responses depending on heat stress conditions. HSE-regulated gene expression was induced under both conditions, while EE-regulated gene expression was only induced under gradual heat stress conditions in both cultivars. Furthermore, HSE-regulated genes showed higher expression in the thermotolerant cultivar than the sensitive cultivar under acute heat shock conditions. Then, candidate expression biomarker genes were selected based on the transcriptome data, and the usefulness of these candidate genes was validated in five cultivars. This study shows that the thermotolerance of tomato is correlated with its ability to maintain the heat shock response (HSR) under acute severe heat shock conditions. Furthermore, it raises the possibility that the robustness of the HSR under severe heat stress can be used as an indicator to evaluate the thermotolerance of crop cultivars

Arabidopsis Cys2/His2 Zinc-Finger Proteins AZF1 and AZF2 Negatively Regulate Abscisic Acid-Repressive and Auxin-Inducible Genes under Abiotic Stress Conditions1[W][OA]

In plants, abiotic stresses induce various physiological changes and growth inhibition that result in adaptive responses to these stresses. However, little is known about how such stresses cause plant growth inhibition. Many genes have been reported to be repressed in plants under abiotic stress conditions. ZPT2 (for petunia [Petunia hybrida] zinc-finger protein 2)-related proteins with two Cys2/His2-type zinc-finger motifs and an ethylene-responsive element binding factor-associated amphiphilic repression motif are thought to function as transcriptional repressors. To characterize the roles of this type of transcriptional repressor under abiotic stress conditions, we analyzed the functions of two Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ZPT2-related genes that were induced by osmotic stress and abscisic acid: AZF1 (for Arabidopsis zinc-finger protein 1) and AZF2. The nuclear localization of these two proteins was observed in the roots under control conditions, and the accumulation of AZF2 was clearly detected in the nuclei of leaf cells under stress conditions. Transgenic plants overexpressing AZF1 and AZF2 were generated using stress-responsive promoters or the GVG chemical induction system. The overexpression of these genes caused severe damage to plant growth and viability. Transcriptome analyses of the transgenic plants demonstrated that AZF1 and AZF2 repressed various genes that were down-regulated by osmotic stress and abscisic acid treatment. Moreover, many auxin-responsive genes were found to be commonly down-regulated in the transgenic plants. Gel mobility shift assays revealed that both the AZF1 and AZF2 proteins bound to the promoter regions of these down-regulated genes. These results indicate that AZF1 and AZF2 function as transcriptional repressors involved in the inhibition of plant growth under abiotic stress conditions

SPINDLY, a Negative Regulator of Gibberellic Acid Signaling, Is Involved in the Plant Abiotic Stress Response1[W][OA]

The SPINDLY (SPY) gene was first identified as a negative regulator of plant gibberellic acid (GA) signaling because mutation of this gene phenocopies plants treated with an overdose of bioactive GA and results in insensitivity to a GA inhibitor during seed germination. The SPY gene encodes an O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase that can modify the target protein and modulate the protein activity in cells. In this study, we describe the strong salt and drought tolerance phenotypes of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) spy-1 and spy-3 mutants in addition to their GA-related phenotypes. SPY gene expression was found to be drought stress inducible and slightly responsive to salt stress. Transcriptome analysis of spy-3 revealed that many GA-responsive genes were up-regulated, which could explain the GA-overdosed phenotype of spy-3. Some stress-inducible genes were found to be up-regulated in spy-3, such as genes encoding late embryogenesis abundant proteins, Responsive to Dehydration20, and AREB1-like transcription factor, which may confer stress tolerance on spy-3. CKX3, a cytokinin (CK) catabolism gene, was up-regulated in spy-3; this up-regulation indicates that the mutant possesses reduced CK signaling, which is consistent with a positive role for SPY in CK signaling. Moreover, overexpression of SPY in transgenics (SPY overexpressing [SPY-OX]) impaired plant drought stress tolerance, opposite to the phenotype of spy. The expression levels of several genes, such as DREB1E/DDF1 and SNH1/WIN1, were decreased in SPY-OX but increased in spy-3. Taken together, these data indicate that SPY plays a negative role in plant abiotic stress tolerance, probably by integrating environmental stress signals via GA and CK cross talk

DataSheet_1_The ability to induce heat shock transcription factor-regulated genes in response to lethal heat stress is associated with thermotolerance in tomato cultivars.pdf

Heat stress is a severe challenge for plant production, and the use of thermotolerant cultivars is critical to ensure stable production in high-temperature-prone environments. However, the selection of thermotolerant cultivars is difficult due to the complex nature of heat stress and the time and space needed for evaluation. In this study, we characterized genome-wide differences in gene expression between thermotolerant and thermosensitive tomato cultivars and examined the possibility of selecting gene expression markers to estimate thermotolerance among different tomato cultivars. We selected one thermotolerant and one thermosensitive cultivar based on physiological evaluations and compared heat-responsive gene expression in these cultivars under stepwise heat stress and acute heat shock conditions. Transcriptomic analyses reveled that two heat-inducible gene expression pathways, controlled by the heat shock element (HSE) and the evening element (EE), respectively, presented different responses depending on heat stress conditions. HSE-regulated gene expression was induced under both conditions, while EE-regulated gene expression was only induced under gradual heat stress conditions in both cultivars. Furthermore, HSE-regulated genes showed higher expression in the thermotolerant cultivar than the sensitive cultivar under acute heat shock conditions. Then, candidate expression biomarker genes were selected based on the transcriptome data, and the usefulness of these candidate genes was validated in five cultivars. This study shows that the thermotolerance of tomato is correlated with its ability to maintain the heat shock response (HSR) under acute severe heat shock conditions. Furthermore, it raises the possibility that the robustness of the HSR under severe heat stress can be used as an indicator to evaluate the thermotolerance of crop cultivars.</p

Table_1_The ability to induce heat shock transcription factor-regulated genes in response to lethal heat stress is associated with thermotolerance in tomato cultivars.xlsx

Heat stress is a severe challenge for plant production, and the use of thermotolerant cultivars is critical to ensure stable production in high-temperature-prone environments. However, the selection of thermotolerant cultivars is difficult due to the complex nature of heat stress and the time and space needed for evaluation. In this study, we characterized genome-wide differences in gene expression between thermotolerant and thermosensitive tomato cultivars and examined the possibility of selecting gene expression markers to estimate thermotolerance among different tomato cultivars. We selected one thermotolerant and one thermosensitive cultivar based on physiological evaluations and compared heat-responsive gene expression in these cultivars under stepwise heat stress and acute heat shock conditions. Transcriptomic analyses reveled that two heat-inducible gene expression pathways, controlled by the heat shock element (HSE) and the evening element (EE), respectively, presented different responses depending on heat stress conditions. HSE-regulated gene expression was induced under both conditions, while EE-regulated gene expression was only induced under gradual heat stress conditions in both cultivars. Furthermore, HSE-regulated genes showed higher expression in the thermotolerant cultivar than the sensitive cultivar under acute heat shock conditions. Then, candidate expression biomarker genes were selected based on the transcriptome data, and the usefulness of these candidate genes was validated in five cultivars. This study shows that the thermotolerance of tomato is correlated with its ability to maintain the heat shock response (HSR) under acute severe heat shock conditions. Furthermore, it raises the possibility that the robustness of the HSR under severe heat stress can be used as an indicator to evaluate the thermotolerance of crop cultivars.</p