A review on regulation of DNA methylation during post-myocardial infarction

Myocardial infarction (MI) imposes a huge medical and economic burden on society, and cardiac repair after MI involves a complex series of processes. Understanding the key mechanisms (such as apoptosis, autophagy, inflammation, and fibrosis) will facilitate further drug development and patient treatment. Presently, a substantial body of evidence suggests that the regulation of epigenetic processes contributes to cardiac repair following MI, with DNA methylation being among the notable epigenetic factors involved. This article will review the research on the mechanism of DNA methylation regulation after MI to provide some insights for future research and development of related drugs

Comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in treatment of left ventricular thrombus- a meta-analysis update

Abstract Background and objective Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or cardiomyopathies is not uncommon. The optimal oral anticoagulation therapy for resolving LVT has been under intense debate. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain the anticoagulant of choice for this condition, according to practice guidelines. Evidence supporting the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the management of LVT continues to grow. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs. Methods A comprehensive literature search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases in July 2023. The efficacy outcomes of this study were thrombus resolution, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, stroke/systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and adverse cardiovascular events. The safety outcomes were any bleeding, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of twenty-seven eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. Data were analyzed utilizing Stata software version 15.1. Results There was no significant difference between DOACs and VKAs with regard to LVT resolution (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.95–1.05, P = 0.99). In the overall analysis, DOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.57–0.96, P = 0.021), all-cause mortality (RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.57–0.86, P = 0.001), any bleeding (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.61–0.92, P = 0.006) and major bleeding (RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.52–0.85, P = 0.001) when compared to VKAs. Meanwhile, in the sub-analysis examining randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the aforementioned outcomes no longer differed significantly between the DOACs and VKAs groups. The incidences of systemic embolism (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.54–1.22, P = 0.32), stroke/systemic embolism (RR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.72–1.00, P = 0.056), intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.23–1.54, P = 0.28), and adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.63–1.56, P = 0.92) were comparable between the DOACs and VKAs groups. A subgroup analysis showed that patients treated with rivaroxaban had a significantly lower risk of stroke (RR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.08–0.72, P = 0.011) than those in the VKAs group. Conclusion With non-inferior efficacy and superior safety, DOACs are promising therapeutic alternatives to VKAs in the treatment of LVT. Further robust investigations are warranted to confirm our findings

The risk factors of thrombus formation and the effect of catheter ablation on repetitive thrombus formation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a single center retrospective study in China

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) predisposes patients to the formation of atrial thrombi. The CHA2DS2-VASc score does not include all risk factors for atrial thrombosis. The present study is designed to explore the influencing factors of thrombus formation in patients with AF and to investigate the effect of catheter ablation (CA) on recurrent thrombosis in patients with a history of intracardiac thrombus. Methods (1) This study consisted of 1726 patients that underwent CA, among which 58 patients had a history of intracardiac thrombus prior to CA. The risk factors for thrombus formation were explored by comparing the baseline clinical characteristics of patients with and without atrial thrombus. (2) The left atrial appendage flow velocity (LAAFV) in patients with a history of intracardiac thrombus who were willing to undergo transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at the latest follow-up were examined, and comparisons of the LAAFV was made before and after CA. Results The median follow-up period is 13 months. Persistent AF was found to be the only independent risk factor affecting the formation of atrial thrombus among the investigated factors (OR 3.152; 95%CI 1.806–5.500; p < 0.001). Twenty-seven patients agreed to undergo TEE during follow-up, no clinical ischemic stroke events were recorded, no recurrent intracardiac thrombus formation was detected in patients, 15 patients maintained sinus rhythm (55.6%) during follow-up; successful CA significantly increased LAAFV (difference between latest evaluation prior to CA 17.46 ± 14.81 cm/s, p < 0.001). Conclusions Persistent AF is the only independent risk factor for thrombus formation. Successful CA may improve the LAAFV and thereby decrease the risk of intracardiac thrombus formation

Additional file 1 of Comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in treatment of left ventricular thrombus- a meta-analysis update

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1. The detailed search strategy of databases. Supplementary Table 2. Quality assessment of included observational studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Supplementary Figure 1. Quality assessment of the included randomized controlled trials. Supplementary Figure 2. Forest plot comparing the efficacy of DOACs and VKA in the treatment of LVT. (A) after 3 months of treatment. (B) after 6 months of treatment. Supplementary Figure 3. Forest plot to compare apixaban with VKAs in outcomes including (A) LVT resolution, (B) stoke/systemic embolism, (C) any bleeding. Supplementary Figure 4. Forest plot to compare rivaroxaban with VKAs in outcomes including (A) LVT resolution. (B) stroke. (C) stroke/systemic embolism. (D) major bleeding. (E) any bleeding. Supplementary Figure 5. The funnel plots based on the outcomes. (A) funnel plot for LVT resolution. (B) funnel plot for stroke. (C) funnel plot for systemic embolism. (D) funnel plot for stroke/systemic embolism. (E) funnel plot for all-cause mortality. (F) funnel plot for any bleeding. (G)funnel plot for major bleeding events. Supplementary Figure 6. Results of sensitivity analyses. (A) LVT resolution. (B) ischemic stroke. (C) systemic embolism. (D) stroke/systemic embolism. (E) any bleeding. (F) major bleeding. (G) intracranial hemorrhage. (H) all-cause mortality. (I) adverse cardiovascular events

Efficacy and Safety of NOACs Compared With VKAs for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A System Review and Meta-Analysis

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are preferentially recommended in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) for stroke prevention over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus VKAs after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with AF is very rare. Pubmed, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane Databases were searched for eligible studies published before May 19, 2022. A total of 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis involving 27 107 patients. Regarding primary outcomes, there were no differences between NOACs and VKAs in all-cause mortality ( RR : 0.84, 95% CI : (0.69, 1.02)) and stroke ( RR : 1.00, 95% CI : (0.85, 1.19)). With respect to secondary outcomes, NOACs were associated with reduced incidence of bleeding ( RR : 0.77, 95% CI : (0.71, 0.83)) and intracranial bleeding ( RR : 0.57, 95% CI : (0.39, 0.83)), whereas no significant differences were found in major or life-threatening bleeding ( RR : 0.98, 95% CI : (0.82, 1.17)) and myocardial infarction ( RR : 1.37, 95% CI : (0.83, 2.26)). Our meta-analysis revealed the safety and efficacy of NOACs may be superior to VKAs in AF patients undergoing TAVI

Table_1_Association of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 rs671 polymorphism with the occurrence and progression of atrial fibrillation.DOC

BackgroundAcetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) is an essential enzyme in alcohol metabolism, playing a vital function in resisting oxidative stress. Lots of gene variants have been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF), among which the association between ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism and AF is variable. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism and AF occurrence or progression and AF recurrence after catheter ablation.MethodsA total of 924 subjects were enrolled in the study. The ALDH2 genotypes are composed of wild-type homozygotes (ALDH2*1/*1), heterozygotes (ALDH2*1/*2), and mutant homozygotes (ALDH2*2/*2), in which the genotypes ALDH2*1/*2 and ALDH2*2/*2 are combined into the ALDH2*2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between ALDH2*2 and AF occurrence and progression. COX regression analysis was used to explore the association of ALDH2*2 with AF recurrence after catheter ablation.ResultsThe prevalence of AF differed significantly between the ALDH2*2 group (102/251) and ALDH2*1/*1 group (330/673) (P = 0.023). For AF occurrence, in the univariate analysis, alcohol consumption was a risk factors (OR: 1.503, P = 0.003), whereas ALDH2*2 was a protective factor (OR: 0.712, P = 0.023). In the multivariate analysis, alcohol consumption (P = 0.156) and ALDH2*2 (P = 0.096) were no longer independent factors. ALDH2*2 with non-drinking was associated with a decreased AF occurrence (OR: 0.65, P = 0.021), whereas ALDH2*2 with drinking was not (P = 0.365). For AF progression, multivariate analysis revealed ALDH2*2 could promote persistent AF in female AF patients (OR: 2.643, P = 0.008). Cox regression analysis suggested that ALDH2*2 (P = 0.752) was not a risk factor for AF recurrence after catheter ablation during a median 6 months follow-up.ConclusionWhile ALDH2*2 was not directly related to AF, ALDH2*2 with non-drinking was associated with a decreased incidence of AF. ALDH2*2 may accelerate AF progression in female patients, increasing the likelihood of developing persistent AF. Therefore, individuals with ALDH2*2 should refrain from consuming alcohol to decrease the onset and progression of AF.</p

Table_2_Association of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 rs671 polymorphism with the occurrence and progression of atrial fibrillation.DOC

BackgroundAcetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) is an essential enzyme in alcohol metabolism, playing a vital function in resisting oxidative stress. Lots of gene variants have been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF), among which the association between ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism and AF is variable. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism and AF occurrence or progression and AF recurrence after catheter ablation.MethodsA total of 924 subjects were enrolled in the study. The ALDH2 genotypes are composed of wild-type homozygotes (ALDH2*1/*1), heterozygotes (ALDH2*1/*2), and mutant homozygotes (ALDH2*2/*2), in which the genotypes ALDH2*1/*2 and ALDH2*2/*2 are combined into the ALDH2*2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between ALDH2*2 and AF occurrence and progression. COX regression analysis was used to explore the association of ALDH2*2 with AF recurrence after catheter ablation.ResultsThe prevalence of AF differed significantly between the ALDH2*2 group (102/251) and ALDH2*1/*1 group (330/673) (P = 0.023). For AF occurrence, in the univariate analysis, alcohol consumption was a risk factors (OR: 1.503, P = 0.003), whereas ALDH2*2 was a protective factor (OR: 0.712, P = 0.023). In the multivariate analysis, alcohol consumption (P = 0.156) and ALDH2*2 (P = 0.096) were no longer independent factors. ALDH2*2 with non-drinking was associated with a decreased AF occurrence (OR: 0.65, P = 0.021), whereas ALDH2*2 with drinking was not (P = 0.365). For AF progression, multivariate analysis revealed ALDH2*2 could promote persistent AF in female AF patients (OR: 2.643, P = 0.008). Cox regression analysis suggested that ALDH2*2 (P = 0.752) was not a risk factor for AF recurrence after catheter ablation during a median 6 months follow-up.ConclusionWhile ALDH2*2 was not directly related to AF, ALDH2*2 with non-drinking was associated with a decreased incidence of AF. ALDH2*2 may accelerate AF progression in female patients, increasing the likelihood of developing persistent AF. Therefore, individuals with ALDH2*2 should refrain from consuming alcohol to decrease the onset and progression of AF.</p

Table_3_Association of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 rs671 polymorphism with the occurrence and progression of atrial fibrillation.DOC

BackgroundAcetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) is an essential enzyme in alcohol metabolism, playing a vital function in resisting oxidative stress. Lots of gene variants have been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF), among which the association between ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism and AF is variable. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ALDH2 rs671 polymorphism and AF occurrence or progression and AF recurrence after catheter ablation.MethodsA total of 924 subjects were enrolled in the study. The ALDH2 genotypes are composed of wild-type homozygotes (ALDH2*1/*1), heterozygotes (ALDH2*1/*2), and mutant homozygotes (ALDH2*2/*2), in which the genotypes ALDH2*1/*2 and ALDH2*2/*2 are combined into the ALDH2*2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between ALDH2*2 and AF occurrence and progression. COX regression analysis was used to explore the association of ALDH2*2 with AF recurrence after catheter ablation.ResultsThe prevalence of AF differed significantly between the ALDH2*2 group (102/251) and ALDH2*1/*1 group (330/673) (P = 0.023). For AF occurrence, in the univariate analysis, alcohol consumption was a risk factors (OR: 1.503, P = 0.003), whereas ALDH2*2 was a protective factor (OR: 0.712, P = 0.023). In the multivariate analysis, alcohol consumption (P = 0.156) and ALDH2*2 (P = 0.096) were no longer independent factors. ALDH2*2 with non-drinking was associated with a decreased AF occurrence (OR: 0.65, P = 0.021), whereas ALDH2*2 with drinking was not (P = 0.365). For AF progression, multivariate analysis revealed ALDH2*2 could promote persistent AF in female AF patients (OR: 2.643, P = 0.008). Cox regression analysis suggested that ALDH2*2 (P = 0.752) was not a risk factor for AF recurrence after catheter ablation during a median 6 months follow-up.ConclusionWhile ALDH2*2 was not directly related to AF, ALDH2*2 with non-drinking was associated with a decreased incidence of AF. ALDH2*2 may accelerate AF progression in female patients, increasing the likelihood of developing persistent AF. Therefore, individuals with ALDH2*2 should refrain from consuming alcohol to decrease the onset and progression of AF.</p