14 research outputs found

    Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods-1

    No full text
    Cutpoints using the five different optimisation criteria.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/8/10</p><p>BMC Psychiatry 2008;8():10-10.</p><p>Published online 19 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2265280.</p><p></p

    Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods-3

    No full text
    Cutpoints using the five different optimisation criteria.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/8/10</p><p>BMC Psychiatry 2008;8():10-10.</p><p>Published online 19 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2265280.</p><p></p

    Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods-0

    No full text
    Cutpoints using the five different optimisation criteria.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/8/10</p><p>BMC Psychiatry 2008;8():10-10.</p><p>Published online 19 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2265280.</p><p></p

    Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods-2

    No full text
    O 12. 2. Solid line denotes the Youden Index. 3. Dashed line denotes the (0,1) method. 4. Dotted line denotes the minimising the error rate method. 5. Dashed and dotted line denotes the prevalence matching method. 6. The minimax method is excluded since it is predominantly coincidental with the prevalence matching method.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/8/10</p><p>BMC Psychiatry 2008;8():10-10.</p><p>Published online 19 Feb 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2265280.</p><p></p

    Temporo-spatial clusters of possible suicides (suicide, undetermined, and accidental poisoning and hanging) for people 15–34 years.

    No full text
    <p>The temporo-spatial analysis identified several possible clusters across Wales for age group 15 to 34 years. Three of the clusters were centred on the county borough of Bridgend, but only cluster number one was statistically significant (p = 0.029).</p
    corecore