3 research outputs found

    Effect of PR-ASG treatment on cellular ROS level and HTase activity in STZ-exposed cells.

    No full text
    <p>A) Initially, cells were incubated under one of these sets of experimental parameters: STZ-negative, PR-ASG-negative (control); 1 mM STZ (STZ group); or 1 mM STZ supplemented with 4 µg/mL of PR-ASG (STZ+PR-ASG). After 1 hr of incubation, the cells were pre-washed with fresh medium, stained with DCF-DA (1.0 µM), and incubated in darkness for 10 min. DCF-DA green fluorescence was viewed under a fluorescence microscope. B) DCF-DA green fluorescing cells were also quantitated by a Perkin-Elmer Victor V multilabel plate reader with excitation/emission filters set at 490 and 535 nm, and expressed as the percent of the total number of cells that exhibit DCA-DA green fluorescence. C) Cells (2.5×10<sup>5</sup> in 1 mL of 10% serum- containing RPMI 1640 medium well) were cultured in12-well plates. One day later, the cells were divided into 3 groups fro 1 hour of exposure to one of the following in RPMI medium containing 1.0 µg/mL rat LDL; no STZ with no PR-ASG (control); 1 mM STZ (STZ); or 1 mM STZ with 4 µg/mL of PR-ASG (STZ+PR-ASG). Subsequently, cells were pre-washed; cultured for 24 hours in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium with 0 or 4 µg/mL of PR-ASG; harvested; and eventually used for enzyme preparation. The cellular supernatant produced during enzyme preparation was assessed for activity using an Alfresa auto HTLase assay kit (Alfresa Pharma Corp., Osaka, Japan). One unit of HTase activity is defined as 1 nmol of HT hydrolyzed in 1 min by 1 mg of protein. In B) and C), values were expressed as means ± SEM, n = 6 individual experiments, and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiples comparison test and then Dunnet's test. The single asterisk denotes a statistically significant difference between STZ and STZ+PR-ASG (*p<0.01).</p

    Suggested mechanism for PR-ASG's protective action against oxidative stress in INS-1 cells.

    No full text
    <p>Reactive oxgen species (ROS) generated from STZ exposure are metabolized and inactivated by SOD, to produce H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. It has been shown that an imbalance in the coordinated expression/activity of glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx) and glutathione reductase (GR) can cause excessive generation of ROS, leading to oxidative stress. GSHPx converts H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to water using glutathione (GSH). Maintenance of the redox state in cells' redox state is controlled by intracellular regulators such as reduced glutathione (GSH) and NADPH. Both GR and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) are enzymes suspected to have protective activity against conditions of oxidative stress. On the other hand, 2-deoxy-glucose (2-DG, an inhibitor of glycolytic pathway) and 6-aminonicotinamide (6-AN, an inhibitor of pentose phosphate pathway) both decrease the cellular levels of pyruvate and NADPH. This leads to an accumulation of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, the building of which acts to induce apoptosis. PR-ASG's defensive action is exerted via an increase in two targets: increasing homocysteine-thiolactonase (HTase) enhances homocysteine (Hcy) metabolism; and increasing pyruvate enhances protection against cell via IGF-1-related glucose metabolism.</p

    Final body weights, blood glucose concentrations, and serum parameters in non-diabetic and diabetic rats (3 weeks).

    No full text
    <p>One-way ANOVA was performed to analyze the variation between 3 groups of non-diabetic or diabetic treatment. The data were then analyzed using Tukey's multiples comparison test (if parametric). Values were expressed as means±SEM. Differences between the PR-treated group and other diet groups were analyzed by Dunnet's multiple comparison test (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).</p
    corecore