12 research outputs found

    DPSS-R-J correlations with convergent and discriminant measures.

    No full text
    <p>DPSS-R-J correlations with convergent and discriminant measures.</p

    Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised

    No full text
    <div><p>The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised is one of the most widely used measures of individual differences for the emotion of disgust. It consists of 2 subscales: disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity. This study examined the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the revised Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale. Japanese participants (N = 1067) completed the scale as well as the Padua Inventory, Anxiety Sensitivity Index, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Positive and Negative Affective Schedule. The participants were divided into 3 samples: Sample 1 (n = 481, mean age = 23.05, 186 males and 295 females); Sample 2 (n = 492, mean age = 20.27, 243 males and 249 females); and Sample 3 (n = 94, mean age = 22.68, 35 males and 58 females). We combined Samples 1 and 2 (n = 973, mean age = 21.66, 429 males and 544 females), and then created 2 subsamples to ensure the mutual independence of the samples used for two different factor analyses: subsample 1 (n = 486, mean age = 21.86, 199 male and 287 female) for exploratory factor analysis and subsample 2 (n = 487, mean age = 21.40, 230 male and 257 female) for confirmatory factor analysis. We examined test-retest reliability using Sample 3, and construct validity using Samples 1, 2, and the combined sample. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the item-factor structure of the Japanese Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised was identical to the English version. Moreover, the scale showed good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity for empirical support as provided by correlational analyses. Results revealed adequate psychometric properties of the scale. This study provided the first examples of empirical support for the DPSS-R-J.</p></div

    Age distribution of the combined sample (n = 973) in this study.

    Get PDF
    <p>Age distribution of the combined sample (n = 973) in this study.</p

    Goodness of fit in the models.

    No full text
    <p>Goodness of fit in the models.</p

    Relationship between the samples and the analyses in this study.

    No full text
    <p>CFA: confirmatory factor analysis; EFA: exploratory factor analysis; OCD: obsessive-compulsive disorder.</p

    DPSS-R-J correlations with convergent and discriminant measures.

    No full text
    <p>DPSS-R-J correlations with convergent and discriminant measures.</p

    Exploratory factor analysis of the DPSS-R-J.

    No full text
    <p>Exploratory factor analysis of the DPSS-R-J.</p

    Descriptive statistics of the variables.

    No full text
    <p>Descriptive statistics of the variables.</p

    Age distribution of the combined sample (n = 973) in this study.

    No full text
    <p>Age distribution of the combined sample (n = 973) in this study.</p

    Standardized regression coefficients of disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity on convergent and discriminant measures.

    No full text
    <p>Standardized regression coefficients of disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity on convergent and discriminant measures.</p
    corecore