キョウクウ センパ ニヨル ノウキョウ ガッペイ オ ミトメタ セイジュクガタ ジュウカク キケイシュ ノ 1レイ

症例は16 歳女性,咳嗽,発熱,左前胸部痛を主訴に来院.胸部CT にて内部不均一な径7 cm の前縦隔腫瘍及び左舌区・下葉の完全無気肺を確認,また,MRI にて前縦隔腫瘍内に脂肪組織と同一の吸収域を認め,成熟型奇形腫穿破による膿胸と診断.膿胸に対し胸腔内繊維素溶解療法,ドレナージ及び抗生剤にて加療,膿胸改善を確認した上で,前縦隔腫瘍摘出術施行,病理にて嚢胞性成熟型奇形腫と診断した.病理組織にて膵類似の腺組織を確認,穿破の原因として,腫瘍内膵酵素の存在が考えられた.成熟型縦隔奇形腫は穿破により重篤な合併症発生の危険性があり,また経過中悪性転化する可能性もあることから,早期の外科治療が重要と考えられた.A 16-year-old female visited our hospital, complaining ofcough, fever, and left precordial pain. Chest computed tomographyshowed a heterogeneous anterior mediastinal tumormeasuring 7 cm in diameter and complete atelectasis inthe lingula and lower lobe of the left lung. Magnetic resonanceimaging also showed an area of intensity identical tothat of adipose tissue in the anterior mediastinal tumor.Thus, empyema due to rupture of a mature teratoma wasdiagnosed. The empyema was treated with intra-pleural fibrinolytictherapy, drainage, and antibiotics. After confirmingresolution of the empyema, we resected the anteriormediastinal tumor and pathologically diagnosed it as cysticmature teratoma. Histopathological examination showedglandular tissue resembling the pancreas, suggesting thatthe rupture had been caused by pancreatic enzymes in thetumor. Mediastinal mature teratoma carries a risk of seriouscomplications developing due to rupture and the possibilityof malignant transformation during the diseasecourse. Thus, early surgical treatment is important

Intervention to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older patients with hip fractures: an observational study

Abstract Background Polypharmacy is frequently observed in hip fracture patients. Although it is associated with an increased risk of hip fracture, polypharmacy often continues after hip fracture recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy for elderly patients admitted to the hospital for hip fractures. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study to compare the outcomes of patients receiving the intervention (n = 32) with those of patients who received usual care (n = 132). All hip fracture patients aged 65 years or older and prescribed 5 or more medications at admission from January 2015 to December 2016 were included in the study. The intervention consisted of an assessment by internal medicine physicians of the appropriateness of polypharmacy and the de-prescription of any unnecessary medications during the patients’ hospital stay. The primary composite outcome was death or the first occurrence of any new fracture. Comparisons between the intervention and usual care groups were analyzed using binary logistic regression. Results A total of 164 patients were included in the study. The mean patient age was 84.8 years, and the mean numbers of prescribed medications and potentially inappropriate medications at admission were 8.0 and 1.3, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 8.0 months. The primary composite outcome occurred in 35 (21.3%) patients. The total number of potentially inappropriate medications at discharge was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the usual care group (0.8 ± 0.8 for the intervention group vs 1.1 ± 1.0 for the usual care group; p = 0.03). However, no significant differences in the primary composite outcome were found between the intervention and usual care groups (7 in the intervention group and 28 in the usual care group, odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.41–2.65; p = 1.00). Conclusions The intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy was associated with a reduction in potentially inappropriate medications but not an improvement in clinical outcomes. This intervention, which focused only on polypharmacy, may not effectively improve outcomes for elderly patients with hip fractures. Trial registration UMIN-CTR UMIN000025495 . Retrospectively registered 2 January 2017

Effect of total exemption from medical service co-payments on potentially inappropriate medication use among elderly ambulatory patients in a single center in Japan: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Abstract Objective The effect of total exemption from medical service co-payments on drug prescribing practices has not been extensively evaluated. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study to evaluate the effect of total exemption from medical service co-payments on potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and benzodiazepine use in elderly ambulatory patients. We defined PIM based on the Beers Criteria. Results Six hundred seventy-one consecutive patients aged 65 years or older who routinely visited internal medicine physicians were included. Their mean age was 75.7 years, and 342 (51.0%) patients were men. The proportions of patients taking any PIMs or benzodiazepines were 37.7% and 16.2%, respectively. Of all patients, 62 (9.2%) were totally exempt from medical service co-payments. The patients who were totally exempt from medical service co-payments showed a significantly increased risk of PIM (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.28–3.66) or benzodiazepine use (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.16–3.87) compared with patients who were not. These associations did not change after adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities and polypharmacy. These findings should be confirmed in other settings or hospitals in Japan

Characteristics of elderly patients with polypharmacy who refuse to participate in an in-hospital deprescribing intervention: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Few studies have evaluated the characteristics of elderly patients with polypharmacy refusing deprescribing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in elderly patients accepting and refusing a deprescribing intervention and to investigate factors associated with deprescribing refusal. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study by analyzing the electronic medical records from a single hospital. All consecutive patients aged 65 years or older who reported the use of five or more medications upon admission to the orthopedic ward from January 2015 to December 2016 and who were approached by a pharmacist for polypharmacy screening were included. Patients who had provided consent for the deprescribing intervention by the internal medicine physicians were defined as the acceptance group, and patients who did not were defined as the refusal group. The primary outcome was the use of any PIMs at admission, based on the 2015 American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria. Using multivariable logistic regression, predictive factors of refusing deprescribing were also evaluated. Results During the study period, 136 patients were eligible. Of those, 82 patients (60.3%) accepted the deprescribing intervention, and 54 patients (39.7%) declined the intervention. The mean age of all the patients was 81.1 years, and the mean number of medications at admission was 9.3. The overall proportion of patients taking any PIMs at admission was 77.2%. The proportion of patients taking any PIMs at admission was not different between the acceptance and refusal groups (78.0% and 75.9%, respectively; p = 0.84). None of the measured characteristics, including age, gender, residential status, comorbidity, alcohol use, smoking status, number of medications, or number of PIMs, were found to be associated with deprescribing refusal. Conclusion The prevalence of any PIM use did not differ among elderly orthopedic patients with polypharmacy according to refusal or acceptance of the deprescribing intervention. Furthermore, none of the analyzed characteristics were found to be associated with deprescribing refusal. Given the high prevalence of PIM use, a strategy is needed for combating polypharmacy among elderly patients reluctant to undergo deprescribing

MOESM1 of Effect of total exemption from medical service co-payments on potentially inappropriate medication use among elderly ambulatory patients in a single center in Japan: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Additional file 1: Table S1. The proportions of patients under various insurance plans according to tiersa in the 609 elderly ambulatory patients included in the control group. aInsurance plans were classified into four tiers based on a past article (Lancet 2011;378:1106-15). bElderly patients were covered by one of these insurance plans unless they received public assistance. Under these insurance plans, adult patients aged less than 75 years must pay 30% of medical costs. Patients aged 75 years and older only pay 10% of medical costs. However, co-payment cost is also affected by several factors, such as enrollees’ income, monthly co-payment threshold, and combination with other insurance plans

Additional file 1: Figure S1. of Intervention to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older patients with hip fractures: an observational study

Flow chart of the participants of the participants until one year after admission. Figure S2. Survival analysis of death. Figure S3 Survival analysis of any new fractures. Figure S4. Survival analysis of the primary composite outcome. Figure S5. Kaplan-Meier survival curve in the two groups. Figure S6. Kaplan-Meier curve for new fracture-free survival in the two groups (DOCX 299 kb

Additional file 2: Table S1. of Intervention to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older patients with hip fractures: an observational study

Summary of logistic regression results to predict the primary composite outcome (DOCX 16 kb