7 research outputs found
Optimal Timing of Administration of Direct-Acting Antivirals for Patients with Hepatitis C-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Liver Transplantation
Objective:
To investigate the optimal timing of direct acting antiviral (DAA) administration in patients with hepatitis C-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing liver transplantation (LT).
Summary of Background Data:
In patients with hepatitis C (HCV) associated HCC undergoing LT, the optimal timing of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) administration to achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) and improved oncologic outcomes remains a topic of much debate.
Methods:
The United States HCC LT Consortium (2015–2019) was reviewed for patients with primary HCV-associated HCC who underwent LT and received DAA therapy at 20 institutions. Primary outcomes were SVR and HCC recurrence-free survival (RFS).
Results:
Of 857 patients, 725 were within Milan criteria. SVR was associated with improved 5-year RFS (92% vs 77%, P < 0.01). Patients who received DAAs pre-LT, 0–3 months post-LT, and ≥3 months post-LT had SVR rates of 91%, 92%, and 82%, and 5-year RFS of 93%, 94%, and 87%, respectively. Among 427 HCV treatment-naïve patients (no previous interferon therapy), patients who achieved SVR with DAAs had improved 5-year RFS (93% vs 76%, P < 0.01). Patients who received DAAs pre-LT, 0–3 months post-LT, and ≥3 months post-LT had SVR rates of 91%, 93%, and 78% (P < 0.01) and 5-year RFS of 93%, 100%, and 83% (P = 0.01).
Conclusions:
The optimal timing of DAA therapy appears to be 0 to 3 months after LT for HCV-associated HCC, given increased rates of SVR and improved RFS. Delayed administration after transplant should be avoided. A prospective randomized controlled trial is warranted to validate these results
Recommended from our members
Initiation of An Intestinal Transplant Program : The Indiana Experience
Recommended from our members
Induction immunosuppression with thymoglobulin and rituximab in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation
Induction immunosuppression is now a common practice after intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. We report our experience in 27 adult recipients who received rituximab and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) in combination as induction agents.
Twenty-seven adult patients received 29 intestinal transplants between July 2004 and March 2007. All patients received induction immunosuppression therapy with rATG, rituximab, and steroids. Tacrolimums and a steroid taper were used for maintenance therapy. Patient and graft survival, episodes of rejection as well as posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) and graft-versus-host disease were analyzed.
One-year patient and graft survival was 81% and 76%, respectively. Thirteen patients (48%) experienced 19 episodes of acute rejection (9 mild episodes, 2 moderate, and 8 severe). Patients with a multivisceral graft experienced less episodes of severe acute rejection (1 of 19, 5%) when compared with isolated intestinal transplants and modified multivisceral transplants (7 of 10, 70%). Two patients had episodes of skin graft-versus-host disease that responded to steroid boluses. PTLD was not seen in our series. Two patients developed cytomegalovirus enteritis.
The combination of rATG and rituximab was an effective induction therapy in our preliminary data. The number and severity of rejection episodes increased when the liver was not included as part of the graft. An immunosuppression regimen including rATG, rituximab, and steroids may have a protective effect against PTLD and chronic rejection
Recommended from our members
Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation
Previous studies have failed to demonstrate a clinical difference between histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) and University of Wisconsin (UW) preservation solutions in clinical transplant outcomes for liver, pancreas, and kidney transplantation. This study compares HTK and UW in bowel transplantation with primary outcomes being graft and patient survival, early graft function, and episodes of rejection.
Data were extracted using a retrospective chart and medical record review of all bowel transplants between 2003 and 2007, and included both pediatric and adult grafts. Transplanted organs included isolated small bowel, modified multivisceral (bowel, pancreas, and stomach) and multivisceral (bowel, pancreas, stomach, and liver). Immunosuppression included induction with a steroid taper and antithymocyte globulin and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab), followed by maintenance with prograf monotherapy. Bowel surveillance was performed with twice weekly zoom endoscopy and biopsy.
There were 54 patients transplanted with 57 grafts, 22 preserved in UW, and 37 in HTK. No differences were noted between the two solutions in initial graft function, appearance of bowel on initial endoscopy, and number of rejection episodes. There were no episodes of pancreatitis in the 44 multivisceral grafts which included a transplant pancreas (14 UW and 30 HTK). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in graft or patient survival at 30- or 90-days posttransplant.
Intestinal grafts preserved in UW and HTK demonstrate no difference in graft and patient survival at 30- and 90-days posttransplant. There were no differences noted in initial function, endoscopic appearance, rejection episodes, or transplant pancreatitis
Recommended from our members
A new vascular approach to the modified multivisceral graft procurement
Massive Leiomyomatous Uterine Proliferation Following Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report and Literature Review
Uterine fibroids are the most common benign uterine tumors affecting > 50% of premenopausal women. The incidence, burden and symptoms from uterine fibroids are higher in women of African descent compared to Caucasians. Despite increasing number of African American females being evaluated for and undergoing kidney transplantation (KT), perioperative management guidelines for uterine fibroids currently do not exist. We present a case of a 40 y/o African American female with known symptomatic uterine fibroids preoperatively and medically managed, who underwent a successful KT and 4 years later progressively developed massive leiomyomatous uterine proliferation, causing a complete lateral displacement of the transplanted kidney with severe hydronephrosis, transplant ureteral obstruction and secondary urinary tract infections with bacteremia. This obstruction required a percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement followed by an interval transabdominal hysterectomy, which was complicated by transplant ureteral transection requiring ureteral reimplantation, resulting in prolonged hospitalization, follow-up and outpatient antibiotic regimen. There is a need for management guidelines for uterine fibroids incidentally encountered during the KT evaluation process to avoid similar preventable post-KT complications in patient populations most commonly affected. Literature review and perioperative management/surveillance strategies are provided
Recommended from our members
No difference in clinical transplant outcomes for local and imported liver allografts
In the United States, liver allograft allocation is strictly regulated. Local centers have the first option to accept a donor liver; this is followed by regional allocation for those donor livers not used locally and then by national allocation for those donor livers not accepted regionally. This study reviews the outcomes of all liver allografts used over 6 years (2001‐2007) and evaluates initial and long‐term function stratified by the geographic source of the donor liver allograft. The records for 845 consecutive deceased donor liver transplants at a single center were reviewed. The geographic origin of the allograft was recorded along with donor and graft characteristics to determine the probable reason for graft refusal. Within our local organ procurement organization, there is 1 liver transplant center, and within the region, there are 8 active centers. Early graft failure included any graft loss within 7 days of transplant, and initial function was measured with liver enzymes 30 days post‐transplant. Graft survival and patient survival were evaluated with Kaplan‐Meier and Cox survival modeling. Median follow‐up was 43 months. The geographic distribution of organs included local organs (562, 66%), regionally imported organs (126, 15%), and nationally imported organs (157, 19%). There were no differences between the 3 groups in initial graft function, intraoperative death, or early graft loss. Survival curves for the 3 study groups demonstrated no difference in survival up to 5 years post‐transplant. In conclusion, liver allografts rejected for use by a large number of transplant centers can still be successfully used without early graft function or long‐term survival being affected. Liver Transpl 15:640–647, 2009. © 2009 AASLD