Altruism: Scoping Review of the Literature and Future Directions for HIV Cure-Related Research

Introduction The question of what motivates people to participate in research is particularly salient in the HIV field. While participation in HIV research was driven by survival in the 1980’s and early 1990’s, access to novel therapies became the primary motivator with the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in the late 1990s. In the HIV cure-related research context, the concept of altruism has remained insufficiently studied. Methods We conducted a scoping review to better contextualize and understand how altruism is or could be operationalized in HIV cure-related research. We drew from the fields of altruism in general, clinical research, cancer, and HIV clinical research–including the HIV prevention, treatment, and cure-related research fields. Discussion Altruism as a key motivating factor for participation in clinical research has often been intertwined with the desire for personal benefit. The cancer field informs us that reasons for participation usually are multi-faceted and complex. The HIV prevention field offers ways to organize altruism–either by the types of benefits achieved (e.g., societal versus personal), or the origin of the values that motivate research participation. The HIV treatment literature reveals the critical role of clinical interactions in fostering altruism. There remains a dearth of in-depth knowledge regarding reasons surrounding research participation and the types of altruism displayed in HIV cure-related clinical research. Conclusion Lessons learned from various research fields can guide questions which will inform the assessment of altruism in future HIV cure-related research

Homologs of genes and anonymous loci on human Chromosome 13 map to mouse Chromosomes 8 and 14

To enhance the comparative map for human Chromosome (Chr) 13, we identified clones for human genes and anonymous loci that cross-hybridized with their mouse homologs and then used linkage crosses for mapping. Of the clones for four genes and twelve anonymous loci tested, cross-hybridization was found for six, COL4A1, COL4A2, D13S26, D13S35, F10, and PCCA. Strong evidence for homology was found for COL4A1, COL4A2, D13S26, D13S35, and F10, but only circumstantial homology evidence was obtained for PCCA. To genetically map these mouse homologs ( Cf10, Col4a1, Col4a2, D14H13S26, D8H13S35 , and Pcca-rs ), we used interspecific and intersubspecific mapping panels. D14H13S26 and Pcca-rs were located on the distal portion of mouse Chr 14 extending by ∼30 cM the conserved linkage between human Chr 13 and mouse Chr 14, assuming that Pcca-rs is the mouse homolog of PCCA. By contrast, Cf10, Col4a1, Col4a2 , and D8H13S35 mapped near the centromere of mouse Chr 8, defining a new conserved linkage. Finally, we identified either a closely linked sequence related to Col4a2 , or a recombination hot-spot between Col4a1 and Col4a2 that has been conserved in humans and mice.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47022/1/335_2004_Article_BF00352413.pd

Effect of nucleotide sequences directly downstream from the AUG on the expression of bovine somatotropin in E. coli.

We have studied the expression of bovine somatotropin (BSt) to gain more understanding of various factors affecting translation in E. coli. The unmodified cDNA coding for mature bovine somatotropin does not produce significant amounts of BSt in E. coli using a pBR322-derived vector. However, a translation fusion with 16 codons from trpLE in front of BSt cDNA results in greater than 20% of total cell protein as the fusion product. Analysis of transcription by measuring the rate and integrity of the mRNA confirms that a post-transcriptional event is responsible for the poor expression of the BSt cDNA. There are two potential stem-loop structures in the 5' region of the mRNA which may interfere with translation. To study their effect on translation, lacZ fusions and oligonucleotide mutagenesis were carried out. The results demonstrate that the secondary structure involving the initiation codon blocks translation initiation. Removal of this stem-loop results in a 100-fold increase in BSt expression. However, the expression level is still low, amounting to only 0.5-1% of total cell protein. High level expression can be obtained by replacement of the beginning sequence of BSt cDNA with trpLE codons. These results suggest that in addition to the secondary structure, the nucleotide sequence or amino acid context within the beginning of BSt is incompatible with one of the steps in translation initiation