Discontinuation of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients achieving clinical remission by treatment with upadacitinib plus methotrexate (DOPPLER study)

Background: The administration of Janus kinase inhibitors as well as biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs has dramatically improved the clinical outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Previous trials have shown that upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, can effectively improve disease activity and prevent progression of joint destruction in RA patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX). It remains unclear whether reduced disease activity can be maintained after discontinuation of MTX in patients treated with upadacitinib plus MTX. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate changes in disease activity after administration of upadacitinib plus MTX in RA patients who failed to achieve an adequate response to MTX and to determine whether clinical relapse can be avoided after discontinuation of MTX in those who achieved clinical remission.Methods/design: The proposed study is an interventional, multicenter, open-label, single-arm clinical trial with a 48-week follow-up. The cohort will include 155 RA patients with at least moderate disease activity during treatment with MTX. Patients will receive upadacitinib and MTX will be discontinued for those who achieve clinical remission. Disease activity will be evaluated longitudinally by measuring clinical disease activity indices and with musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who sustain a disease activity score-28- C reactive protein score of ≤3.2 from week 24 to 48 after a disease activity score-28- C reactive protein score of <2.6 at week 24. Important secondary endpoints are changes from baseline MSUS scores. Serum levels of multiple biomarkers, including cytokines and chemokines, will be comprehensively analyzed.Discussion: The study results are expected to show the clinical benefit of the discontinuation of MTX after achieving clinical remission by treatment with upadacitinib plus MTX combination therapy. The strength of this study is the prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using clinical disease activity indices and standardized MSUS, which can accurately and objectively evaluate disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers. Furthermore, parameters to predict clinical remission after administration of upadacitinib plus MTX combination therapy and nonclinical relapse after discontinuation of MTX will be screened by integrated multilateral assessments (i.e., clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers)

Association between preoperative toe perfusion index and maternal core temperature decrease during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a prospective cohort study

Background: The main mechanism of body temperature decrease during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is core-to-peripheral redistribution of body heat, attributable to vasodilation. Perfusion index (PI) obtained with a pulse oximeter helps to assess peripheral perfusion dynamics by detecting the change in peripheral vascular tone. This study aimed to examine whether preoperative toe PI could predict the decrease in core temperature induced by spinal anesthesia during cesarean delivery.Methods: Parturients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia from September 2019 to March 2020 were enrolled in this single-center prospective cohort study. All parturients received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) with fentanyl (15 μg) intrathecally. A pulse oximeter probe was placed on the left second toe for continuous PI measurement. The 3 M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System placed over the right temporal region was used to record core temperature over time. We evaluated the association between the maximum core temperature decrease, which is the primary outcome, and the preoperative toe PI at operating room (OR) admission using a segmented regression model (SRM) and a generalized additive model (GAM). The maximum core temperature decrease was defined as the difference between core temperature at OR admission and minimum intraoperative core temperature.Results: Forty-eight patients were evaluated. In the SRM, the slope for the association between the maximum core temperature decrease and the preoperative toe PI changed from 0.031 to 0.124 after PI = 2.4%. Likewise, with the GAM, there was a small core temperature decrease when preoperative toe PI was greater than 2.0 to 3.0%.Conclusions: Low preoperative toe PI was associated with maternal core temperature decrease during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Preoperative toe PI is a simple, non-invasive, and effective tool for the early prediction of perioperative core temperature decrease during cesarean delivery.Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (registry number: UMIN000037965)

Efficacy and safety of selective JAK 1 inhibitor filgotinib in active rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate: comparative study with filgotinib and tocilizumab examined by clinical index as well as musculoskeletal ultrasound assessment (TRANSFORM study): study protocol for a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, and non-inferiority clinical trial

Background:Administration of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has dramatically improved even the clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Dysregulation of JAK-STAT pathways via overproduction of cytokines, such as interleukin-6, is involved in the pathogenesis of RA. Filgotinib is a selective JAK1 inhibitor pending approval for use in RA. By inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway, filgotinib is effective in suppressing disease activity and preventing the progression of joint destruction. Similarly, interleukin-6 inhibitors such as tocilizumab also inhibit the JAK-STAT pathways by inhibition of interleukin-6 signaling. We present the protocol for a study that will evaluate whether the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy is non-inferior to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX.Methods:This study is an interventional, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, and non-inferiority clinical trial with a 52-week follow-up. Study participants will be 400 RA patients with at least moderate disease activity during treatment with MTX. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to administer filgotinib monotherapy or subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy switched from MTX. We will evaluate disease activity by measuring clinical disease activity indices and by using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve an American College of Rheumatology 50 response at week 12. Secondary endpoints are changes from baseline in the MSUS scores. We will also comprehensively analyze serum levels of multiple biomarkers, such as cytokines and chemokines.Discussion:The study results are expected to show the non-inferiority of the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with inadequate response to MTX. The strength of this study is its prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using not only clinical disease activity indices, but also MSUS, which accurately and objectively evaluates disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers with a standardized evaluation by MSUS. We will evaluate the effectiveness of both drugs by integrating multilateral assessments—clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers

A comparative study of the sarcopenia screening in older patients with interstitial lung disease

Background: The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS 2019) is the gold standard diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia in Asian populations. The calf circumference (CalF), the strength, assistance in walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) and the SARC-CalF questionnaires for sarcopenia screening have been used by AWGS 2019. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy of these three sarcopenia screening tools in patients with interstitial lung disease.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, stable patients with interstitial lung disease were enrolled. The SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and CalF, used in patients with interstitial lung disease, were compared to the diagnostic criteria proposed by AWGS 2019. The accuracy of screening tools was compared using sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were computed.Results: Seventy eight patients were analyzed, and sarcopenia was identified in 25 (32.1%) patients with interstitial lung disease by the AWGS 2019 criteria. The sensitivity of the CalF was highest (96%) of the three screening tools, while the specificity was 60%. The sensitivity of SARC-F and SARC-CalF were 24% and 68%, while the specificity were 92% and 66%, respectively. The AUCs of CalF, SARC-F, and SARC-CalF in all patients were 0.78, 0.58, and 0.67, respectively.Conclusions: The CalF is most suitable for screening sarcopenia in patients with interstitial lung disease, while SARC-F and SARC-CalF are not

Comparison design and evaluation power in cohort and self-controlled case series designs for post-authorization vaccine safety studies

Background Post-authorization safety studies (PASSs) of vaccines are important. PASSs enable the evaluation of association between vaccination and adverse events following immunization through common study designs. Clinical trials during vaccine development typically include a few thousand to 10,000 participants while a PASS might aim to detect a few adverse events per 100,000 vaccine recipients. While all available data may be utilized, prior consideration of power analyses are nonetheless crucial for interpretation in cases where statistically significant differences are not found. Methods This research primarily examined cohort study design and self-controlled case series (SCCS) design, estimating the power of a PASS under plausible conditions. Results Both the cohort study and SCCS designs necessitated large sample sizes or high event counts to guarantee adequate power. The SCCS design is particularly suited to evaluating rare adverse events. However, extremely rare events may not yield sufficient occurrences, thereby resulting in low power. Although the SCCS design can more efficiently control for time-invariant confounding in principle, it solely estimates relative measures. A cohort study design might be preferred if confounding can be adequately managed as it also estimates absolute measures. It may be an easy decision to use all the data at hand for either design. We found it necessary to estimate the sample size and number of events to be used in the study based on a priori information and anticipated results

Comparison design and evaluation power in cohort and self-controlled case series designs for post-authorization vaccine safety studies

Background: Post-authorization safety studies (PASSs) of vaccines are important. PASSs enable the evaluation of association between vaccination and adverse events following immunization through common study designs. Clinical trials during vaccine development typically include a few thousand to 10,000 participants while a PASS might aim to detect a few adverse events per 100,000 vaccine recipients. While all available data may be utilized, prior consideration of power analyses are nonetheless crucial for interpretation in cases where statistically significant differences are not found. Methods: This research primarily examined cohort study design and self-controlled case series (SCCS) design, estimating the power of a PASS under plausible conditions. Results: Both the cohort study and SCCS designs necessitated large sample sizes or high event counts to guarantee adequate power. The SCCS design is particularly suited to evaluating rare adverse events. However, extremely rare events may not yield sufficient occurrences, thereby resulting in low power. Although the SCCS design can more efficiently control for time-invariant confounding in principle, it solely estimates relative measures. A cohort study design might be preferred if confounding can be adequately managed as it also estimates absolute measures. It may be an easy decision to use all the data at hand for either design. We found it necessary to estimate the sample size and number of events to be used in the study based on a priori information and anticipated results.PeerJ, 12, art. no. e16780; 202

Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Against Infection, Symptomatic Infection, and Hospitalization Among Older Adults Aged ≥65 Years During the Delta Variant Predominance in Japan: The VENUS Study

Background: We evaluated the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against infection, symptomatic infection, and hospitalization in older people during the Delta-predominant period (July 1 to September 30, 2021). Methods: We performed a population-based cohort study in an older adult population aged ≥65 years using data from the Vaccine Effectiveness, Networking, and Universal Safety Study conducted from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2021, in Japan. We matched BNT162b2-vaccinated and -unvaccinated individuals in a 1:1 ratio on the date of vaccination of the vaccinated individual. We evaluated the effectiveness of the vaccine against infection, symptomatic infection, and coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related hospitalization by comparing the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. We estimated the risk ratio and risk difference using the Kaplan–Meier method with inverse probability weighting. The vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1 − risk ratio) × 100%. Results: The study included 203,574 matched pairs aged ≥65 years. At 7 days after the second dose, the vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 against infection, symptomatic infection, and hospitalization was 78.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.2–87.8%), 79.1% (95% CI, 64.6–88.9%), and 93.5% (95% CI, 83.7–100%), respectively. Conclusion: BNT162b2 was highly effective against infection, symptomatic infection, and hospitalization in Japan’s older adult population aged ≥65 years during the Delta-predominant period

Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving clinical remission (the IFX-SIRIUS study I)

BACKGROUND: The introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) into clinical practice has dramatically improve the clinical outcomes of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, bDMARDs are associated with high costs, which has resulted in restricted treatment access and a burden on medical insurance finances. Although biosimilars offer cost-saving, their effectiveness and safety must be established in Post-Marketing Surveillance (PMS). Infliximab (IFX), a chimeric monoclonal antibody to TNF-alpha, is the first bDMARD; its biosimilar, CT-P13, is the first biosimilar DMARD approved for RA treatment in Japan. We will evaluate whether switching from originator IFX to CT-P13 is not inferior for maintaining non-clinical relapse to continued treatment with originator IFX in RA patients achieving clinical remission. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is an interventional, multicenter, open-label, single-arm against historical control and noninferiority clinical trial with a 24-week follow-up. Eighty RA patients who are treated by originator IFX for ?24 weeks and are achieving clinical remission will be included. Patients will be switched to CT-P13 with the unchanged dosing regimen. We will evaluate disease activity by measuring clinical disease activity indices and by using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the ratio of patients who experience a nonclinical relapse during the study period. Important secondary endpoints are the changes from the baseline of the MSUS scores. We will also comprehensively analyze the serum levels of many biomarkers such as cytokines and chemokines.DISCUSSION: The study results are expected to show the noninferiority of switching to CT-P13 over the continuation of originator IFX. The strength of this study is its prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using not only clinical disease activity indices but also MSUS to accurately and objectively evaluate disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers with a standardized evaluation by MSUS. We will explore whether parameters at baseline can predict a nonclinical relapse after switching from originator IFX to CT-P13 by integrating multilateral assessments, i.e., clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp) on October 11, 2019 as jRCTs071190030

Discontinuation of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients achieving clinical remission by treatment with upadacitinib plus methotrexate (DOPPLER study)

BACKGROUND: The administration of Janus kinase inhibitors as well as biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs has dramatically improved the clinical outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Previous trials have shown that upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, can effectively improve disease activity and prevent progression of joint destruction in RA patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX). It remains unclear whether reduced disease activity can be maintained after discontinuation of MTX in patients treated with upadacitinib plus MTX. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate changes in disease activity after administration of upadacitinib plus MTX in RA patients who failed to achieve an adequate response to MTX and to determine whether clinical relapse can be avoided after discontinuation of MTX in those who achieved clinical remission. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is an interventional, multicenter, open-label, single-arm clinical trial with a 48-week follow-up. The cohort will include 155 RA patients with at least moderate disease activity during treatment with MTX. Patients will receive upadacitinib and MTX will be discontinued for those who achieve clinical remission. Disease activity will be evaluated longitudinally by measuring clinical disease activity indices and with musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who sustain a disease activity score-28- C reactive protein score of ≤3.2 from week 24 to 48 after a disease activity score-28- C reactive protein score of <2.6 at week 24. Important secondary endpoints are changes from baseline MSUS scores. Serum levels of multiple biomarkers, including cytokines and chemokines, will be comprehensively analyzed. DISCUSSION: The study results are expected to show the clinical benefit of the discontinuation of MTX after achieving clinical remission by treatment with upadacitinib plus MTX combination therapy. The strength of this study is the prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using clinical disease activity indices and standardized MSUS, which can accurately and objectively evaluate disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers. Furthermore, parameters to predict clinical remission after administration of upadacitinib plus MTX combination therapy and nonclinical relapse after discontinuation of MTX will be screened by integrated multilateral assessments (i.e., clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers)