Improved multi‐model ensemble forecasts of Iran's precipitation and temperature using a hybrid dynamical‐statistical approach during fall and winter seasons

Skillful seasonal climate forecasts can support decision making in water resources management and agricultural planning. In arid and semi-arid regions, tailoring reliable forecasts has the potential to improve water management by using key hydroclimate variables months in advance. This article analyses and compares the performance of two common approaches (empirical and hybrid dynamical-statistical) in seasonal climate forecasting over a drought-prone area located in Southwest Asia including Iran. Empirical models are framed as a baseline skill that hybrid models need to outperform. Both approaches provide probabilistic forecasts of precipitation and temperature using canonical correlation analysis to provide forecasts at 0.25° resolution. Empirical models are developed based on the large-scale observed atmosphere–ocean patterns for forecasting using antecedent climate anomalies as predictors, while the hybrid approach makes use of model output statistics to correct systematic errors in dynamical climate model forecast outputs. Eight state-of-the-art dynamical models from the North American Multi-Model Ensemble project are analysed. Individual models with the highest goodness index are weighted to develop seven different hybrid dynamical-statistical Multi-model Ensembles. In this study, (October–December) and (January–February) are considered as target seasons which are the most important periods within the water year for water resource allocation to the agriculture sector. The results show that the hybrid approach has improved performance compared to the raw general circulation models and purely empirical models, and that the performance of the hybrid models is season-dependent. Seasonal forecasts of precipitation (temperature) have a higher skill in OND (JFM). In addition, in most cases, Multi-model Ensemble (MME) is more skillful than the empirical models and outperforms individual dynamical models. However, the best individual model might be as skillful as the MME given the target season and region of interest