24 research outputs found

    Article on vitamin A suppressing skin cancer. Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy of Dose-Intensive Oral Vitamin A in Subjects with Sun-Damaged Skin

    Get PDF
    ABSTRACT Purpose: Previously, we reported the results of a Phase III, placebo-controlled trial in 2,297 randomized participants with moderately severe actinic keratoses wherein 25,000 IU/day vitamin A caused a 32% risk reduction in squamous cell skin cancers. We hypothesized that dose escalation of vitamin A to 50,000 or 75,000 IU/day would be both safe and more efficacious in skin cancer chemoprevention. Experimental Design: One hundred and twenty-nine participants with severely sun-damaged skin on their lateral forearms were randomized to receive placebo or 25,000, 50,000, or 75,000 IU/day vitamin A for 12 months. The primary study end points were the clinical and laboratory safety of vitamin A, and the secondary end points included quantitative, karyometric image analysis and assessment of retinoid and rexinoid receptors in sun-damaged skin. Results: There were no significant differences in expected clinical and laboratory toxicities between the groups of participants randomized to placebo, 25,000 IU/day, 50,000 IU/day, and 75,000 IU/day. Karyometric features were computed from the basal cell layer of skin biopsies, and a total of 22,600 nuclei from 113 participants were examined, showing statistically significant, dose-response effects for vitamin A at the 25,000 and 50,000 IU/day doses. These karyometric changes correlated with increases in retinoic acid receptor , retinoic acid receptor ß, and retinoid X receptor at the 50,000 IU/day vitamin A dose. Conclusions: The vitamin A doses of 50,000 and 75,000 IU/day for 1 year proved safe and equally more efficacious than the 25,000 IU/day dose and can be recommended for future skin cancer chemoprevention studies

    Feasibility of a family-focused YMCA-based diabetes prevention program in youth: The E.P.I.C. Kids (Encourage, Practice, and Inspire Change) Study

    No full text
    Efficacious lifestyle modification programs for children at risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) have not been well established outside of clinical settings. In this study, the feasibility of a family-focused, YMCA-based prevention program for children at risk of T2D was evaluated between September 2015 and July 2016 in Tucson, Arizona. A 12-week YMCA-led lifestyle intervention was adapted for 9–12-year-old children and their families to encourage healthy eating, physical activity, and supportive home environments. Two YMCA locations were randomized to offer either a face-to-face lifestyle coach-led intervention or an alternating face-to-face and digitally-delivered intervention. Program feasibility and preliminary effects on child anthropometric and behavioral outcomes were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Changes were assessed using linear regression combining delivery formats, with adjustment for clustering of participants within site/format. Forty-eight children (10.9 ± 1.2 years old; 45% female; 40% Hispanic; 43% White; 87% obese) and their parents enrolled, and 36 (75%) completed 12-week measures. Weekly program attendance averaged 61%. Participants and coaches highly rated program content and engagement strategies. Statistically significant changes in child BMI-z score (−0.05, p = 0.03) and family food and physical activity environment (+5.5% family nutrition and physical activity score, p = 0.01) were observed. A YMCA-led family-focused T2D intervention was feasible for the YMCA and participants and effects on child weight, behavior, and the home environment warranted further investigation. Keywords: Pediatric obesity, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Lifestyle intervention, YMCA, Diabetes preventio

    Ciliated prostate cancer and stromal cells have decreased axoneme lengths.

    No full text
    <p>(A and B) Primary cilia (Ac-Tub; red), centrosomes (γ-Tub; green), nuclei (Hoechst; blue), and cytokeratin 5 (CK5; white), are shown to illustrate representative ciliary lengths. Images were selected to represent the median length for normal and the 25<sup>th</sup> percentile for PIN and cancer cells (note that many PIN and cancer cells have cilia shorter than those shown). Cilia lengths are given. (A) Normal basal cell, normal luminal cell, CK5+ basal cell in PIN, CK5-cancer cell and (B) stromal cell in normal, PIN, and cancer tissue. Boxplots of cilia lengths for (C, top) all epithelial, (D, top) CK5+, (E, top) CK5-and (F, top) stromal cells per patient for normal, PIN, cancer (Ca), and perineural invasion (Peri). Q4, Q1 are as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0068521#pone-0068521-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1</a>. Statistics were performed using linear regression (* = p<0.05, *** = p<0.001) (C, D, E, and F, bottom). The percent of patients with abnormally long cilia (Q4; orange) or abnormally short cilia (Q1; blue).</p

    Primary cilia loss correlates with greater nuclear β-catenin in normal.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) images of β-catenin staining in normal prostate, demonstrate a lack of β-catenin localization in basal cells (blue nuclei, black arrows; left). Basal cells were identified based on position, morphology, and cytokeratin 5 (CK5) staining in the adjoining serial section (white arrows; right). The lumen (Lum) and stroma (Strm) are labeled. IHC images show different levels and spatial distributions of β-catenin staining in (B) PIN, (C) cancer, and (D) perineural invasion. (E) Graphs display percent ciliated cells versus β-catenin nuclear score. Scattergraphs were plotted per location for normal, PIN, cancer, and perineural invasion tissue. For normal, basal cells (green) and luminal cells (blue) are shown. For PIN, cancer and perineural invasion, all epithelial/cancer cells are plotted red. High nuclear β-catenin was defined as the 75<sup>th</sup> percentile of normal, denoted by the dotted line, and was used to compare normal to PIN, cancer and perineural cells. Percentages represent the locations with high nuclear β-catenin. Statistical analysis was performed using linear regression and included all of the data points, and comparisons to normal basal cells are denoted with p, and comparisons to normal luminal cells are denoted with p*.</p

    Primary cilia frequency is decreased on both CK5+ and CK5- cancer cells.

    No full text
    <p>Images of normal prostate and invasive prostate cancer. Nuclei (Hoechst; blue), cytokeratin 5 (CK5; white), primary cilia (Ac-Tub; red) and centrosomes (γ-Tub; green) are labeled. (A) CK5 marks the basal cell population in normal tissue. (A, left) A ciliated CK5+ normal cell and (A, right) an unciliated CK5+ cancer cell are shown at higher magnification. (B, left) A ciliated CK5- normal cell, and (B, right) an unciliated CK5- cancer cell. (C, top) Boxplots of the percent ciliated CK5+ and (D, top) CK5- epithelial and cancer cells per patient for each tissue type: normal, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), cancer (Ca), and perineural invasion (Peri). Q4, Q1 are as in Fig. 1. Statistics were performed using linear regression (*=p<0.05, ***= p<0.001). (C, bottom) Percent of CK5+ and (D, bottom) CK5- patients with an abnormally high percent cilia (Q4; orange), or an abnormally low percent cilia (Q1; blue).</p

    Primary cilia expression is decreased in preinvasive and invasive prostate cancer.

    No full text
    <p>Images of (A) normal prostate and (B) invasive prostate cancer. Serially adjacent slides were stained with H&E to visualize tissue morphology or stained fluorescently for nuclei (Hoechst; blue), primary cilia (Ac-Tub; red) and centrosomes (γ-Tub; green). Labeled structures are lumen (Lum), cancer (Ca), and stroma (Strm). Inset shows magnification of (A) a primary cilium on a normal epithelial cell and (B) a centrosome without a cilium on a cancer cell. Asterisk denotes nonspecific staining (C, top). Box plot of the percent of ciliated epithelial and cancer cells per patient for each tissue type: normal, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), cancer (Ca), and perinerual invasion (Peri). Orange line and arrow correspond to Q4 (quartile 4; greater than the 75<sup>th</sup> percentile for normal tissue) and blue line and arrow correspond to Q1 (quartile 1; less than or equal to the 25<sup>th</sup> percentile for normal tissue). Statistics were performed using linear regression (*** = p<0.001) (C, bottom). The percent of patients with an abnormally high percent cilia (Q4; orange) or an abnormally low percent cilia (Q1; blue). (D) Percent of Ki67 positive invasive cancer cells and perineural invasion cancer cells per patient (x-axis) versus percent ciliated cancer cells for the same patient (y-axis). Statistical analysis was a non-parametric spearman correlation.</p
    corecore