Results of systematic reviews conducted to identify community-representative epidemiological data for higher and low prevalence mental disorders.

*<p>Number of data sources by disorder. Note that some studies report data for more than one disorder.</p>**<p>In total 96,349 data sources were identified for the review series (ie. high and low prevalence disorders and disorders with onset in childhood).</p

Population coverage of prevalence data for common mental disorders: averaged across major depressive disorder, dysthymia and anxiety disorders.

<p>Population coverage of prevalence data for common mental disorders: averaged across major depressive disorder, dysthymia and anxiety disorders.</p

Average population coverage of prevalence data for low prevalence disorders: averaged across schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and eating disorders.

<p>Average population coverage of prevalence data for low prevalence disorders: averaged across schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and eating disorders.</p

Estimated global coverage^* of prevalence data for mental disorders by Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study world region.

*<p>Coverage: % of population represented by prevalence studies for mental disorders, adjusted for study age-ranges, gender-coverage and sub-national sampling frames.</p>**<p>GBD World Region: see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0065514#pone.0065514.s001" target="_blank">Figure S1</a> for more information on world regions used in the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.</p

Characteristics of WMH samples and percent of respondents reporting lifetime traumatic events.

<p>Characteristics of WMH samples and percent of respondents reporting lifetime traumatic events.</p

The potentially traumatic events assessed in the World Mental Health Surveys.

<p>The potentially traumatic events assessed in the World Mental Health Surveys.</p

Association between traumatic events and persistence of suicidal behavior¹.

<p>*Significant at the 0.05 level, 2-sided test.</p>1<p>Assessed in Part II sample due to having Part II controls. Countries include: Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Colombia, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Lebanon, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, People's Republic of China, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Ukraine, United States. Results are based on discrete time survival model with country differences, a set of age-related variables (i.e., age, onset and time since onset), sociodemographic variables (including sex, educational attainment and marriage), parent psychopathology, and childhood adversity as a control (additional details available upon request).</p>2<p>Each row represents a separate bivariate model; some models do not include data from all countries if the country is missing the variable. India and Brazil were dropped in the bivariate model for Combat, Exposure to War and Refugees; and Brazil was dropped in the bivariate model for Natural Disaster. For Israel, the entire sample is coded “Yes” for Exposure to War with the age of onset set to the age they moved to Israel.</p>3<p>Some countries were missing part of the trauma variables and were coded “No” for those variables in the multivariate models: Combat, Exposure to War and Refugee were all coded “No” for India and Brazil; and Natural Disaster was also coded “No” for Brazil. For Israel, the entire sample is coded “Yes” for Exposure to War with the age of onset set to the age they moved to Israel.</p>4<p>For number of events, the last odd ratio represents the odd of the number or more. For example, for the attempt among ideators, 6 events represent 6 or more events (i.e., 6+ events).</p

Bivariate model for associations between traumatic events and suicidal behavior¹.

<p>*Significant at the .05 level, two-sided test.</p>1<p>Assessed in Part II sample due to having Part II controls. Each row represents a separate bivariate model; some models do not include data from all countries if the country is missing the variable. India and Brazil were dropped in the bivariate model for Combat, Exposure to War and Refugees; and Brazil was dropped in the bivariate model for Natural Disaster. For Israel, the entire sample is coded “Yes” for exposure to war with the age of onset set to the age they moved to Israel. Controls for all models included person-year, country, demographic factors (age, sex, time-varying education, time-varying marriage), interactions between life course (3 dichotomous dummies representing early, middle, and later years in the person's life) and demographic variables, parent psychopathology, and childhood adversities (additional details available upon request).</p

Suicidal behavior assessed with interactions between DSM-IV PTSD and individual traumatic events¹.

<p>*Significant at the .05 level, two-sided test.</p>1<p>Multiviate models included interaction terms between DSM-IV PTSD and each trauma event. Only interaction terms are shown in the table, while the main effects are still controlled for. Assessed in Part II sample due to having Part II controls. Some countries were missing part of the trauma variables and were coded “No” for those variables: Combat, Exposure to War, Refugee were all coded “No” for India and Brazil, and Natural Disaster also coded “No” for Brazil. For Israel, the entire sample is coded “Yes” for exposure to war with the age of onset set to the age they moved to Israel. Controls for all models included person-year, country, demographic factors (age, sex, time-varying education, time-varying marriage), interactions between life course (3 dichotomous dummies representing early, middle, and later years in the person's life) and demographic variables, parent psychopathology, and childhood adversities (additional details available upon request).</p

Multivariate model for associations between traumatic events and suicidal behavior¹.

<p>*Significant at the .05 level, two-sided test.</p>1<p>Assessed in Part II sample due to having Part II controls. Some countries were missing part of the trauma variables and were coded “No” for those variables: Combat, Exposure to War, Refugee were all coded “No” for India and Brazil, and Natural Disaster also coded “No” for Brazil. For Israel, the entire sample is coded “Yes” for exposure to war with the age of onset set to the age they moved to Israel. Controls for all models included person-year, country, demographic factors (age, sex, time-varying education, time-varying marriage), interactions between life course (3 dichotomous dummies representing early, middle, and later years in the person's life) and demographic variables, parent psychopathology, and childhood adversities (additional details available upon request).</p