13 research outputs found
Cleft palate repair and variations
Cleft palate affects almost every function of the face except vision. Today a child born with cleft palate with or without cleft lip should not be considered as unfortunate, because surgical repair of cleft palate has reached a highly satisfactory level. However for an average cleft surgeon palatoplasty remains an enigma. The surgery differs from centre to centre and surgeon to surgeon. However there is general agreement that palatoplasty (soft palate at least) should be performed between 6-12 months of age. Basically there are three groups of palatoplasty techniques. One is for hard palate repair, second for soft palate repair and the third based on the surgical schedule. Hard palate repair techniques are Veau-Wardill-Kilner V-Y, von Langenbeck, two-flap, Aleveolar extension palatoplasty, vomer flap, raw area free palatoplasty etc. The soft palate techniques are intravelar veloplasty, double opposing Z-plasty, radical muscle dissection, primary pharyngeal flap etc. And the protocol based techniques are Schweckendiek's, Malek's, whole in one, modified schedule with palatoplasty before lip repair etc. One should also know the effect of each technique on maxillofacial growth and speech. The ideal technique of palatoplasty is the one which gives perfect speech without affecting the maxillofacial growth and hearing. The techniques are still evolving because we are yet to design an ideal one. It is always good to know all the techniques and variations so that one can choose whichever gives the best result in one's hands. A large number of techniques are available in literature, and also every surgeon incorporates his own modification to make it a variation. However there are some basic techniques, which are described in details which are used in various centres. Some of the important variations are also described
Pressure ulcers: Back to the basics
Pressure ulcer in an otherwise sick patient is a matter of concern for the care givers as well as the medical personnel. A lot has been done to understand the disease process. So much so that USA and European countries have established advisory panels in their respective continents. Since the establishment of these organizations, the understanding of the pressure ulcer has improved significantly. The authors feel that the well documented and well publicized definition of pressure ulcer is somewhat lacking in the correct description of the disease process. Hence, a modified definition has been presented. This disease is here to stay. In the process of managing these ulcers the basic pathology needs to be understood well. Pressure ischemia is the main reason behind the occurrence of ulceration. Different extrinsic and intrinsic factors have been described in detail with review of literature. There are a large number of risk factors causing ulceration. The risk assessment scales have eluded the surgical literature and mostly remained in nursing books and websites. These scales have been reproduced for completion of the basics on decubitus ulcer. The classification of the pressure sores has been given in a comparative form to elucidate that most of the classifications are the same except for minor variations. The management of these ulcers is ever evolving but the age old saying of "prevention is better than cure" suits this condition the most
A status report on management of cleft lip and palate in India
Introduction: This national survey on the management of cleft lip and
palate (CLP) in India is the first of its kind. Objective: To collect
basic data on the management of patients with CLP in India for further
evaluation. Materials and Methods: A proforma was designed and sent
to all the surgeons treating CLP in India. It was publicized through
internet, emails, post and through personal communication. Subjects:
293 cleft surgeons representing 112 centers responded to the
questionnaire. Most of the forms were filled up by personal interview.
Results: The cleft workload of the participating centers is between 10
and 2000 surgeries annually. These centers collectively perform
32,500-34,700 primary and secondary cleft surgeries every year. The
responses were analyzed using Microsoft excel and 112 as the sample
size. Most surgeons are repairing cleft lip between 3-6 months and
cleft palate between 6 months to 1 year. Millard and Tennison repairs
form the mainstay of lip repair. Multiple techniques are used for
palate repair. Presurgical orthopedics, lip adhesion, nasendoscopy,
speech therapy, video-fluoroscopy and orthognathic surgery were not
always available and in some cases not availed of even when available.
Conclusion: Management of CLP differs in India. Primary surgical
practices are almost similar to other studies. There is a lack of
interdisciplinary approach in majority of the centers, and hence, there
is a need for better interaction amongst the specialists. A more
comprehensive study with an improved questionnaire would be desirable
Premenarchal labia minora hypertrophy
Labia minora hypertrophy is a relatively uncommon surgical entity being popularised in the realm of vulvovaginal plastic surgeries. Apart from the unaesthetic appearance of the hypertrophied minora, these cases are also associated with itching, hygiene problem, pain while sitting down, sports activities, difficulty in wearing tight clothing, bleeding and discomfort while or after sexual intercourse, social embarrassment, insecurity and psychological diminution of confidence and self-esteem. In a country like India, due to sociocultural reasons, patients hesitate to consult a doctor for such deformities. Most of the patients suffer in silence for years. Although common in the west, very few surgeons in the country perform this simple and rewarding surgery. Here, we are presenting a case of premenarchal juvenile labia minora hypertrophy (JLMH) in an 8-year-old child. Labial hypertrophy in this age group is uncommon. We were unable to find hypertrophy of labia minora in the eight-year-old child on English literature search