Locoregional Treatment for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Background: The locoregional recurrence of breast cancer has been reduced due to the multidisciplinary approach of breast surgery, systemic therapy and radiation. Early detection and better surgical techniques contribute to an improvement in breast cancer outcomes. Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to have an overview and summary of the current evidence behind the current approaches to the locoregional treatment of breast cancer and to discuss its future direction. Summary: With improved surgical techniques and the use of a more effective neoadjuvant systemic therapy, including checkpoint inhibitors and dual HER2-directed therapies that lead to a higher frequency of pathologic complete responses and advances in adjuvant radiation therapy, breast cancer patients are experiencing better locoregional control and reduced local and systemic recurrence. De-escalation in surgery has not only improved the quality of life in the majority of breast cancer patients, but also maintained the low risk of recurrence. There are ongoing clinical trials to optimize radiation therapy in breast cancer. More modern radiation technologies are evolving to improve the patient outcome and reduce radiation toxicities

Disparities in Receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline-Adherent Care and Outcomes among Women with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Insurance Type

BackgroundThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were designed to improve patient outcomes. Here, we examine factors that may contribute to outcomes and guideline adherence in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of women with triple-negative breast cancer using the California Cancer Registry. Adherent treatment was defined as the receipt of a combination of surgery, lymph node assessment, adjuvant radiation, and/or chemotherapy. A multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the effects of independent variables on adherence to the NCCN guidelines. Disease-specific survival was calculated using Cox regression analysis.ResultsA total of 16,858 women were analyzed. Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive guideline-adherent care (OR 0.82, 95%CI 0.73-0.92 and OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.79-0.95, respectively) compared to White patients. Hazard ratios adjusted for adherent care showed that Black patients had increased disease-specific mortality (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.16-1.42, p < 0.0001) compared to White patients.ConclusionsA significant majority of breast cancer patients in California continue to receive non-guideline-adherent care. Non-Hispanic Black patients and patients from lower SES quintile groups were less likely to receive guideline-adherent care. Patients with non-adherent care had worse disease-specific survival compared to recipients of NCCN guideline-adherent care

Disparities in Receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline-Adherent Care and Outcomes among Women with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Insurance Type

Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were designed to improve patient outcomes. Here, we examine factors that may contribute to outcomes and guideline adherence in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of women with triple-negative breast cancer using the California Cancer Registry. Adherent treatment was defined as the receipt of a combination of surgery, lymph node assessment, adjuvant radiation, and/or chemotherapy. A multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the effects of independent variables on adherence to the NCCN guidelines. Disease-specific survival was calculated using Cox regression analysis. Results: A total of 16,858 women were analyzed. Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive guideline-adherent care (OR 0.82, 95%CI 0.73–0.92 and OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.79–0.95, respectively) compared to White patients. Hazard ratios adjusted for adherent care showed that Black patients had increased disease-specific mortality (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.16–1.42, p < 0.0001) compared to White patients. Conclusions: A significant majority of breast cancer patients in California continue to receive non-guideline-adherent care. Non-Hispanic Black patients and patients from lower SES quintile groups were less likely to receive guideline-adherent care. Patients with non-adherent care had worse disease-specific survival compared to recipients of NCCN guideline-adherent care