Food Insecurity Incidence and Healthcare Insurance Impact on College Students

A study done in spring, 2018 on Winthrop Students on food insecurity and other factors such as health insurance impact on fiscal resiliency

Women, Diversity and the Glass Ceiling

Get a quick overview of glass ceilings and “walls,” current legislative options, and the benefits of diversity in the workplace

Breastfeeding Rights in the United States

Breastfeeding Rights in the United States shows that the right to breastfeed in this country exists only in a negative sense: you can do it unless someone takes you to court. Kedrowski and Lipscomb catalog and analyze all the laws, policies, judicial opinions, cultural mores, and public attitudes that bear on breastfeeding in America. They then explore the classic double bind: social norms promulgated by the medical and public health establishment say breast is best; but social practices in the workplace and in public spaces make breastfeeding difficult. Aggravating the double bind is the prominence of the breast in American culture as a sexual object. The double bind creates coercively structured choices that are incompatible with the meaningful exercise of rights.The authors conclude that the solution to this problem requires new theory and new strategy. They posit a new democratic, feminist theory of the breastfeeding right that is predicated on the following distinctions: DT It is not a right to breastfeed, but a right to choose to breastfeed. DT It is a woman\u27s right to choose, not a baby\u27s right to be breastfeed. DT It is a right, not a duty. The authors predict that framing the breastfeeding right in this way provides the basis for a new strategic coalition between breastfeeding advocates and liberal feminists, who have historically been wary of one another\u27s rhetoric. Breastfeeding Rights in the United States represents an important advance toward policy change.https://digitalcommons.winthrop.edu/facultybookgallery/1017/thumbnail.jp

Cancer Activism Gender, Media, and Public Policy

Cancer Activism explores the interplay between advocacy, the media, and public perception through an analysis of breast cancer and prostate cancer activist groups over a nearly twenty-year period. Despite both diseases having nearly identical mortality and morbidity rates, Karen M. Kedrowski and Marilyn Stine Sarow present evidence from more than 4,200 news articles to show that the different groups have had markedly different impacts. They trace the rise of each movement from its beginning and explore how discussions about the diseases appeared on media, public, and government agendas. In an important exception to the feminist tenet that women as a group hold less power than men, Kedrowski and Sarow demonstrate that the breast cancer movement is not only larger and better organized than the prostate cancer movement, it is also far more successful at shaping media coverage, public opinion, and government policy.https://digitalcommons.winthrop.edu/facultybookgallery/1018/thumbnail.jp