Ethogram for early life maternal interactions; Distribution of 5-HTTLPR genotypes from Adaptive developmental plasticity in rhesus macaques: the serotonin transporter gene interacts with maternal care to affect juvenile social behaviour

Research has increasingly highlighted the role that developmental plasticity—the ability of a particular genotype to produce variable phenotypes in response to different early environments—plays as an adaptive mechanism. One of the most widely studied genetic contributors to developmental plasticity in humans and rhesus macaques is a serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR), which determines transcriptional efficiency of the serotonin transporter gene <i>in vitro</i> and modifies the availability of synaptic serotonin in these species. A majority of studies to date have shown that carriers of a loss-of-function variant of the 5-HTTLPR, the short (s) allele, develop a stress-reactive phenotype in response to adverse early environments compared with long (l) allele homozygotes, leading to the prevalent conceptualization of the s-allele as a vulnerability allele. However, this framework fails to address the independent evolution of these loss-of-function mutations in both humans and macaques as well as the high population prevalence of s-alleles in both species. Here we show in free-ranging rhesus macaques that s-allele carriers benefit more from supportive early social environments than l-allele homozygotes, such that s-allele carriers which receive higher levels of maternal protection during infancy demonstrate greater social competence later in life. These findings provide the first empirical support for the assertion that the s-allele grants high undirected biological sensitivity to context in primates and suggest a mechanism through which the 5-HTTLPR s-allele is maintained in primate populations

Visual attention distribution during the response to conspecific social stimuli test.

<p>Infants later classified as Low-Social (LS) showed a lower rate of gaze aversion to aggression, and looked at the social stimuli less frequently than infants later classified as High-Social (HS), but both monkey groups spent a greater percentage of time looking at aggressive vs. neutral behavioral displays. (a) The rate of gaze aversion differed between infants later classified as LS and HS only during the aggression exemplars. (b) The rate of looking also differed between infants later classified as LS and HS only during the aggression exemplars. Infants later classified as HS, but not LS, differed in their rate of looking between aggression and neutral exemplar types. (c) The percentage of time spent looking at aggression did not differ between monkey groups, and both groups spent more time looking at aggressive displays over neutral ones.</p

Preference for novel faces on the face recognition memory test.

<p>During recognition trials, infants later classified as Low-Social (LS) did not show a preference above chance for the novel face (percentage of time looking on target directed to the novel face) (97.5% CI: 43.6% - 53.3%); whereas infants later classified as High-Social (HS) did (97.5% CI: 51.6% - 61.0%). Data are plotted as LSM +/- SE. Effect size is given in the text as partial eta ().</p

Face recognition memory test.

<p>During a familiarization trial (a) infants were presented with two identical unfamiliar rhesus monkey faces. During the subsequent recognition trial (b) infants were presented with the same rhesus monkey face from the immediately preceding familiarization trial as well as a novel face.</p

Blood AVP concentration predicts NEPSY Theory of Mind score in ASD children (autistic and PDD-NOS) but not in non-ASD children (sibling and neurotypical control).

<p>Data have been corrected for the following blocking factors: age, sex, ethnicity, blood sample collection time, and full scale IQ. Data are plotted as a mean and standard error for each AVP quintile within the ASD and non-ASD groups. The means shown are of the log transformed plasma AVP values used in the analysis itself. ASD Quintile (Q) Q1 <i>n</i> = 11, Q2 <i>n</i> = 12, Q3 <i>n</i> = 11, Q4 <i>n</i> = 11, Q5 <i>n</i> = 12; Non-ASD Q1 <i>n</i> = 20, Q2 <i>n</i> = 21, Q3 <i>n</i> = 21, Q4 <i>n</i> = 19, Q5 <i>n</i> = 21.</p

Participant characteristics.

<p><b>χ</b>² was used to test whether the distribution of individuals to different groups differed by sex and by ethnicity. Significant effects were found for each. However, post hoc tests failed to find any group that showed a significant difference from expected (by sex or by ethnicity). For age, full-scale IQ, and blood collection time, differences between groups were tested with a simple one-way general linear model. The values are expressed in mean ± SEM. Abbreviations</p><p>* = P < 0.05</p><p>^ns = not significant.</p><p>Values with different letter superscripts (i.e., ^a, ^b, or ^c) within the same column of the table differ significantly, whereas values with the same letter superscript (i.e., ^a, ^b, or ^c) within the same column of the table do not differ, according to Tukey’s post hoc test.</p><p>Participant characteristics.</p

Patient demographics and medical characteristics.

<p>Abbreviations: AVP, arginine vasopressin; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloblastic leukemia</p><p>¹indicates CSF collected from lumbar puncture</p><p>²indicates CSF collected from left ventricle</p><p>³indicates CSF collected from the cisterna magna.</p><p>Patient demographics and medical characteristics.</p

Blood arginine vasopressin (AVP) concentration significantly and positively predicts cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AVP concentration.

<p>Sample size is <i>n</i> = 28.</p