11 research outputs found

    Number of repeats per dataset.

    No full text
    <p>The total number of tandem repeats (red triangles) and G-quadruplex (green rectangles), sequences per CNV breakpoint (B) and control (C1-C20) datasets are plotted.</p

    Common 50-bp motif in CNV breakpoint dataset.

    No full text
    <p>Logo plots for (<b>A</b>) MEME and (<b>B</b>) NestedMICA motifs show nearly identical consensus sequences.</p

    Repeats enriched and depleted in CNV breakpoints. The GC content and number of breakpoints are listed for the six CNV types.

    No full text
    <p>Repeats enriched and depleted in CNV breakpoints. The GC content and number of breakpoints are listed for the six CNV types.</p

    Characterization of spacers.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Distribution of lengths of spacers measured by high-resolution array CGH only (nβ€Š=β€Š29) or junction sequencing (nβ€Š=β€Š21) are plotted separately. The distribution of all 50 spacer lengths is also shown. (B) The amount of inverted microhomology observed at 13 sequenced disomy-inverted duplication junctionsβ€”2 bp (nβ€Š=β€Š7), 3 bp (nβ€Š=β€Š2), 4 bp (nβ€Š=β€Š2), 5 bp (nβ€Š=β€Š1), or 8 bp (nβ€Š=β€Š1)β€”are shown relative to the microhomology detected for 1,000 simulated spacers (see Methods).</p

    Complex junctions from EGL106 and 18q-65c.

    No full text
    <p>Insertion orientation (+/βˆ’) is indicated relative to the reference genome. (A) Alignment of telomere (black), inverted duplication (orange), inserted sequence (blue), and junction sequence (EGL106) from the telomere-inversion junction is shown above. The inverted duplication, disomic sequence (grey), and inversion-disomy junction sequence (EGL106) alignment is shown below. Microhomology at the junction is boxed. (B) Above, disomic, inserted, and inverted duplication sequences are aligned to the disomy-inversion junction sequence (18q-65c). Below, inverted duplication and telomere sequences are aligned to the inversion-telomere junction sequence (18q-65c). Inserted sequences and their neighboring homologous sequences are underlined.</p

    FISH analysis of inverted duplication translocation chromosomes.

    No full text
    <p>(A) EGL398's 3.1-Mb duplication of 2q37 is visible by interphase FISH. BAC probes RP11-206J15 (red) and RP11-1415N13 (green) hybridize to the duplicated and control regions on chromosome 2, respectively. Three red signals in the interphase nucleus indicate a duplication of chromosome 2q37. (B) BAC probes RP11-798H13 (red) and RP11-380E2 (green) hybridize to the ends of the normal chromosomes 1p and the end of the inverted duplication translocation chromosome in EGL398. (C) EGL399's terminal deletion of 7q is detected as loss of a red signal. Vysis ToTelVysion mix 7 (Abbott Molecular, #05J05-001) probes hybridize to the ends of chromosomes 7p (green), 7q (red), and 14q (yellow). The blue signals correspond to a control probe that hybridizes to chromosome 14q11. (D) BAC RP11-341D4 (red) hybridizes to the normal chromosomes 8p and the translocation of 8p on EGL399's inverted duplication translocation between chromosomes 7 and 8. The green signal corresponds to alpha satellite from the centromere of chromosome 8.</p

    Large Inverted Duplications in the Human Genome Form via a Fold-Back Mechanism

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Inverted duplications are a common type of copy number variation (CNV) in germline and somatic genomes. Large duplications that include many genes can lead to both neurodevelopmental phenotypes in children and gene amplifications in tumors. There are several models for inverted duplication formation, most of which include a dicentric chromosome intermediate followed by breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycles, but the mechanisms that give rise to the inverted dicentric chromosome in most inverted duplications remain unknown. Here we have combined high-resolution array CGH, custom sequence capture, next-generation sequencing, and long-range PCR to analyze the breakpoints of 50 nonrecurrent inverted duplications in patients with intellectual disability, autism, and congenital anomalies. For half of the rearrangements in our study, we sequenced at least one breakpoint junction. Sequence analysis of breakpoint junctions reveals a normal-copy disomic spacer between inverted and non-inverted copies of the duplication. Further, short inverted sequences are present at the boundary of the disomic spacer and the inverted duplication. These data support a mechanism of inverted duplication formation whereby a chromosome with a double-strand break intrastrand pairs with itself to form a β€œfold-back” intermediate that, after DNA replication, produces a dicentric inverted chromosome with a disomic spacer corresponding to the site of the fold-back loop. This process can lead to inverted duplications adjacent to terminal deletions, inverted duplications juxtaposed to translocations, and inverted duplication ring chromosomes.</p></div

    Inverted duplication junctions.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Location of disomy-inversion and inversion-telomere junctions in an inverted duplication terminal deletion chromosome. (B) 18q-233c's disomy-inversion junction spans a hybrid LINE made up of L1PA2 and L1Hs elements. On a normal chromosome 18, these elements are positioned in opposite orientation. (C) Local genomic context of 18q-233c's spacer and breakpoints relative to the reference genome assembly. The distal end of the disomic spacer (grey box) includes the L1PA2, and the proximal region corresponding to the beginning of the inverted duplication (orange box) includes the L1Hs. The disomy-inversion junction sequence (black rectangles with white arrows) aligns to the distal end of the spacer (positions 1–465 of the junction) and the start of the inverted duplication (positions 140–834 of the junction). Interspersed repeats are shown as black rectangles. No segmental duplications are present in the breakpoint regions.</p

    Inverted duplication organization.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Model of duplicated sequences (orange arrows) separated by disomic spacer sequence (grey line). The end of the inverted duplication may terminate in a telomere (black triangle) or a translocated chromosome (blue). The site of the terminal deletion is shown relative to a normal chromosome. (B) EGL044's inverted duplication of chromosome 2 is detectable by chromosome banding. (C) The 5.8-Mb terminal deletion and 42-Mb inverted duplication of chromosome 2 are detectable by low-resolution array CGH <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004139#pgen.1004139-Baldwin1" target="_blank">[53]</a>. Note that the 2,047-bp spacer region is not visible. Log2 ratios of oligonucleotide probes are indicated by dots; normal-copy number (black), duplication (red), and deletion (green) regions are shown. (D) PCR of the disomy-inversion junction (lane 2) and the inversion-telomere junction (lane 4) amplifies genomic DNA from EGL044, but not control genomic DNA (lanes 3 and 5). Lane 1 is GeneRuler 1 kb Plus DNA ladder (Thermo Scientific Fermentas #SM1333).</p

    Sequenced breakpoint junctions.

    No full text
    <p>Sizes of deletions, duplications, and spacers in bp are shown. The numbers of sequenced disomy-inversion (Dis-inv), inversion-telomere (Inv-tel), and inversion-translocation (Inv-tra) junctions are listed. Spacers without a sequenced Dis-inv junction were measured from most distal duplicated probe to the most proximal deleted probe on the array. The full list of inverted duplication CNVs is provided in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004139#pgen.1004139.s003" target="_blank">Table S1</a>.</p
    corecore