Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pregnant women: cross-sectional analysis of physiological parameters throughout pregnancy and the impact of the supine position

There are physiological reasons for the effects of positioning on hemodynamic variables and cardiac dimensions related to altered intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressures. This problem is especially evident in pregnant women due to the additional aorto-caval compression by the enlarged uterus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of postural changes

Influence of socioeconomic factors on pregnancy outcome in women with structural heart disease

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac disease is the leading cause of indirect maternal mortality. The aim of this study was to analyse to what extent socioeconomic factors influence the outcome of pregnancy in women with heart disease.  METHODS: The Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease is a global prospective registry. For this analysis, countries that enrolled ≥10 patients were included. A combined cardiac endpoint included maternal cardiac death, arrhythmia requiring treatment, heart failure, thromboembolic event, aortic dissection, endocarditis, acute coronary syndrome, hospitalisation for cardiac reason or intervention. Associations between patient characteristics, country characteristics (income inequality expressed as Gini coefficient, health expenditure, schooling, gross domestic product, birth rate and hospital beds) and cardiac endpoints were checked in a three-level model (patient-centre-country).  RESULTS: A total of 30 countries enrolled 2924 patients from 89 centres. At least one endpoint occurred in 645 women (22.1%). Maternal age, New York Heart Association classification and modified WHO risk classification were associated with the combined endpoint and explained 37% of variance in outcome. Gini coefficient and country-specific birth rate explained an additional 4%. There were large differences between the individual countries, but the need for multilevel modelling to account for these differences disappeared after adjustment for patient characteristics, Gini and country-specific birth rate.  CONCLUSION: While there are definite interregional differences in pregnancy outcome in women with cardiac disease, these differences seem to be mainly driven by individual patient characteristics. Adjustment for country characteristics refined the results to a limited extent, but maternal condition seems to be the main determinant of outcome

Comparison of Candesartan Versus Metoprolol for Treatment of Systemic Hypertension After Repaired Aortic Coarctation

Even after successful repair, hypertension is one of the main determinants of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with aortic coarctation (CoA). We compared the effect of candesartan (angiotensin 11 receptor blockade) and metoprolol (beta-adrenergic receptor blockade) on blood pressure, large artery stiffness, and neurohormonal status in hypertensive patients after repair of CoA. In the present open-label, crossover study, hypertensive patients after CoA repair were first randomly assigned to treatment with candesartan 8 mg or metoprolol 100 mg once per day. After 8 weeks of treatment with one of the drugs, the other treatment was given for 8 weeks. The treatment effects were assessed with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, measurement of large artery stiffness, and neurohormonal plasma levels at baseline and after 8 weeks of either treatment. Sixteen patients (mean age 37 +/- 12 years, 26 +/- 15 years after repair, 63% men) completed the study. The 24-hour mean arterial pressure at baseline was 97.7 +/- 6.2 mm Hg. Metoprolol (mean dose 163 +/- 50 mg/day) decreased the mean arterial pressure (7.0 +/- 4.2 and 4.1 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, respectively) more than did candesartan (mean dose 13 +/- 4 mg/day; p = 0.018, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 5.5). Large artery stiffness did not change with either treatment. With metoprolol, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide increased and plasma renin decreased. With candesartan, the plasma renin and noradrenaline levels increased and aldosterone levels decreased. In conclusion, in adult hypertensive patients after CoA repair, metoprolol had more of an antihypertensive effect than did candesartan. Moreover, the neurohormonal outcome did not support a significant role for the renin-angiotensin system in the causative mechanism of hypertension after CoA. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2010;105:217-222