29 research outputs found

    Transumbilical Totally Laparoscopic Single-Port Nissen Fundoplication: A New Method of Liver Retraction: The Istanbul Technique

    Get PDF
    Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, founder of the Turkish Republic, had guarded many German scientists of a Jewish descent before the Second World War. Dr. Rudolf Nissen was one of the outstanding surgeons who had served in the Turkish university hospitals. He had created an antireflux procedure which is named after his own name while he was working in our clinic, the CerrahpaAYa Hospital. From a laparoscopic approach, the Nissen fundoplication was the gold standard intervention for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Currently, video laparoscopic surgery is evolving quickly with the guidance of new technology. Single-port (SP) laparoscopic transumbilical surgery is one of the newest branches of advanced laparoscopy

    Transvaginal Assisted Totally Laparoscopic Single-Port Right Colectomy

    No full text
    Operative approach for right colectomy has progressed substantially in last decades, by the application of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Single-port (SP) laparoscopic surgery is one of the newest branches of advanced laparoscopy. A 29-year-old woman with ileocecal Crohn's disease underwent a totally laparoscopic transumbilical SP right colectomy, assisted by vaginal access. The operation time was 140 minutes. The blood loss was 20 mL. The patient was allowed to drink fluids and a soft oral diet on the first day postoperatively. Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications were observed. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 4. The wound size was 2.5 cm. The umbilical scar was almost invisible on postoperative day 7. Totally laparoscopic transumbilical SP right colectomy with vaginal access is a feasible procedure, providing a scarless surgery, ensuring the preservation of the body image

    Hybrid laparo-endoscopic single port transperitoneal right adrenalectomy

    No full text
    Laparoscopic surgery is a preferable technique for adrenalectomy. Laparo-endoscopic single port surgery (LESS) is one of the newest areas in minimally invasive surgery. The development of the technology has made many surgical procedures less invasive. In this paper, we report hybrid laparo-endoscopic single port transperitoneal right adrenalectomy for a non-functional adrenal mass

    Total laparoscopic approach for the treatment of right colon cancer: A technical critique

    No full text
    Total laparoscopic surgery is not a new concept, but it is not preferred generally for right colectomy. The aim of the study is to evaluate the outcomes, which are related with surgical technique after total laparoscopic right colectomy (TLRC) and laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy (LARC) for right colon cancer in 30 consecutive patients. Thirty patients with right colon cancer, half of which were treated with TLRC and half of which were treated with LARC, were compared with regard to patient demographics, operative and postoperative data, histopathologic findings, follow-up data, and the complications related to the surgical technique. There were 16 men and 14 women, median age was 63 years (range 41–86) with a body mass index (BMI) of 27 kg/m2 (range 20–33). There were no differences between the groups for BMI, harvested lymph node number, or distal and radial margins. The length of the incision and the length of the postoperative stay was shorter in the TLRC group (p = 0.000). Overall complications were higher in the LARC group than in the TLRC group (p = 0.014). The median follow-up was 28 months (range 5–99). In the late period, two patients in the LARC group were reoperated on. The cause of reoperation was internal herniation in one patient due to ileal twisting and incisional hernia in the other one. Our preliminary data indicate that TLRC could result in better outcomes for right colon cancer patients than LARC

    Total laparoscopic approach for the treatment of right colon cancer: A technical critique

    Get PDF
    Background and aims: Total laparoscopic surgery is not a new concept, but it is not preferred generally for right colectomy. The aim of the study is to evaluate the outcomes, which are related with surgical technique after total laparoscopic right colectomy (TLRC) and laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy (LARC) for right colon cancer in 30 consecutive patients. Materials and methods: Thirty patients with right colon cancer, half of which were treated with TLRC and half of which were treated with LARC, were compared with regard to patient demographics, operative and postoperative data, histopathologic findings, follow-up data, and the complications related to the surgical technique. Results: There were 16 men and 14 women, median age was 63 years (range 41–86) with a body mass index (BMI) of 27 kg/m2 (range 20–33). There were no differences between the groups for BMI, harvested lymph node number, or distal and radial margins. The length of the incision and the length of the postoperative stay was shorter in the TLRC group (p = 0.000). Overall complications were higher in the LARC group than in the TLRC group (p = 0.014). The median follow-up was 28 months (range 5–99). In the late period, two patients in the LARC group were reoperated on. The cause of reoperation was internal herniation in one patient due to ileal twisting and incisional hernia in the other one. Conclusion: Our preliminary data indicate that TLRC could result in better outcomes for right colon cancer patients than LARC

    Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Initial Experience from 30 Consecutive Patients

    No full text
    Background Robotic surgery offers 3D visualization and the advantage of the usage of multi-articulated instruments with superior dexterity. Theoretically, it can overcome many limitations of laparoscopic rectal surgery in the narrow pelvis

    Evaluation of Diverting Ileostomy in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

    Get PDF
    Diverting ileostomy is believed to mitigate the effects of anastomotic complications in low anterior resections (LAR) for rectal cancer. However, there are no data about the effects of diverting ileostomy on the outcomes of laparoscopic LAR Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 77 consecutive rectal cancer patients who had undergone laparoscopic LAR with (n = 23) or without (n = 54) diverting ileostomy. The patients' data were recorded and supplemented on short-term follow-up visits and included standard demographics, operative procedure, location of the cancer, and final pathologic diagnosis. We noted length of hospitalisation, complications, and time interval from ileostomy creation to closure. Morbidity and mortality were also included. Results: Surgical intervention requiring anastomotic leakage occurred in three patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR without diverting ileostomy. The anastomosis level of patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR with diverting ileostomy was significantly lower than that of patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR without diverting ileostomy (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Anastomosis level and total mesorectal excision are the main factors for creation of diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic LAR Laparoscopic LAR without diverting ileostomy could be selectively performed. Our study provides a basis for further prospective randomised studies on the role of diverting ileostomy in LAR
    corecore