1 research outputs found
Coverage and framing of initiative for 13th Saeima dismissal by LR1
Multimediju komunikÄcijaInformÄcijas un komunikÄcijas zinÄtnesMultimedia CommunicationInformation and Communication SciencesBakalaura darba nosaukums ir āJautÄjuma par 13. Saeimas atlaiÅ”anas iniciatÄ«vu atspoguļojums un rÄmÄjums Latvijas Radio 1ā. MÄrÄ·is ir noteikt, vai LR1 kÄ sabiedriskais medijs, ir sociÄli atbildÄ«gs, atspoguļojot jautÄjumu par 13. Saeimas atlaiÅ”anas iniciatÄ«vu.
Å
emot vÄrÄ, ka sabiedriskÄ medija funkcijas ir atvasinÄtas no normatÄ«vÄs mediju teorijas, teorÄtiskajÄ daÄ¼Ä tiek apskatÄ«ts, kÄ medijiem vajadzÄtu strÄdÄt, to uzdevumus iekļaujot āatbildÄ«bas lomÄā un sabiedrÄ«bas intereÅ”u kontekstÄ. SekojoÅ”i pÄc tÄ tiek veidota teorÄtiska izpratne par dienaskÄrtÄ«bas un rÄmÄjuma teorijÄm, jo empÄ«riskajÄ daÄ¼Ä raidÄ«jumi tiek pÄtÄ«ti ar iepriekÅ” noteiktiem kritÄrijiem, kas izveidoti, balstoties uz dienaskÄrtÄ«bas un rÄmÄjuma teorijÄs iegÅ«tajÄm atziÅÄm. Izlasi veido visi LR1 raidÄ«jumi, kas sevÄ« ietver 13. Saeimas atlaiÅ”anas iniciatÄ«vas jautÄjumu. Datu iegÅ«Å”anai izmantota secÄ«gi jauktÄ pÄtÄ«juma stratÄÄ£ija ā vispirms kontentanalÄ«ze un pÄc tam sarunu analÄ«ze. RezultÄtos abas metodes ir sapludinÄtas.
Tiek secinÄts, ka pÄtÄmais jautÄjums LR1 dienaskÄrtÄ«bÄ bijis nozÄ«mÄ«gs no 2019. gada 1.novembra lÄ«dz tÄ paÅ”a gada 31. decembrim, kas vÄrtÄjams ar tÄ laika notikumu aktualitÄti politiskajÄ un sabiedriskajÄ dienaskÄrtÄ«bÄ. Tiek konstatÄta pÄtÄmÄ jautÄjuma tematiska nelÄ«dzsvarotÄ«ba un avotu dažÄdÄ«bas trÅ«kums. KopumÄ 13. Saeimas atlaiÅ”anas jautÄjuma atspoguļojumÄ LR1 pielietojis pastiprinÄtu aizdomu rÄmÄjumu, akcentÄjot labuma guvÄjus un to savtÄ«gÄs intereses. TÄpat atklÄta raidÄ«jumu vadÄ«tÄju neprofesionalitÄte, veidojot pamudinÄjuma rÄmÄjumu jeb attÄ«stot sarunu jau noteiktos virzienos. LÄ«dz ar to, darbÄ tiek izstrÄdÄti priekÅ”likumi sabiedrisko mediju prakses uzlaboÅ”anai, kuros iekļauts tas, lai žurnÄlisti bÅ«tu neitrÄlÄki un neizrÄdÄ«tu personÄ«go attieksmi, kÄ arÄ« lai par sabiedrÄ«bÄ aktuÄliem jautÄjumiem tiktu sniegta daudzveidÄ«gÄka informÄcija gan tematiskÄ, gan avotu kontekstÄ.The title of the bachelor's thesis is āCoverage and framing of initiative for 13th Saeima dismissal by Latvian Radio 1ā. The aim is to determine whether LR1 as a public medium, is socially responsible, reflecting the issue of the initiative to dismiss the 13th Saeima.
Given that the functions of social media are derived from normative media theory, the theoretical part looks at how the media should work, including their tasks in a ārole of responsibilityā and in the context of the public interest. Consequently, a theoretical understanding of the theories of agenda setting and framing is formed, because in the empirical part the programs are studied with pre-defined criteria, which are created on the basis of the findings obtained in the theories of agenda setting and framing. Chosen selection consists of all LR1 programs, which include the issues of the 13th Saeima dismissal initiative. A sequential mixed research strategy was used to obtain the data - first content analysis and then conversation analysis. In the results, the two methods are merged.
It is concluded that the researched issue was important in the agenda setting of LR1 from November 1, 2019 to December 31 of the same year, which can be assessed by the topicality of the events of that time in the political and public agenda setting. The thematic imbalance of the research question and the lack of diversity of sources are identified. In general, in the reflection on the issue of dismissal of the 13th Saeima, LR1 has used an enhanced framework of suspicions, emphasizing the beneficiaries and their selfish interests. The unprofessionalism of the presenters was also revealed, creating a frame of encouragement or developing the conversation in certain directions. Consequently, the work develops proposals for the improvement of public media practice, which includes the fact that journalists are more neutral and do not show personal attitude, as well as that more diverse information on topical issues in society is provided both in the thematic and source context