Session 3: \u3cem\u3eCancerTrialMatch: a web application for the curation and matching of clinical trials at a precision oncology center\u3c/em\u3e

The adoption of next-generation sequencing for cancer patients has made molecular profiling possible and identify biomarkers. At the Avera Cancer Institute, biomarker-based clinical trials are often presented as treatment options to oncologists at the molecular tumor board. This necessitated a method to capturestructured trial data and match them to patients based on their disease and sequencing profile in a systematic manner. We developed an open-source web application, CancerTrialMatch, that enables to (i) add trials through a semi-automated curation interface, (ii) browse and search trials, (iii) and match patients to biomarker-based trials. This application uses R Shiny to create simple interfaces, a mongo database to store trial data, various R libraries to query data and perform computations, and Docker to manage software installation and application instantiation. The curation interface is semi-automated because querying the clinicaltrials.gov API will return discrete data for many fields, except biomarkers and disease subtypes. The user has to manually input disease type based on the OncoTree classification, as well as biomarker information for mutations, copy numbers, fusions, TMB, MSI/PD-L1 status, RNA expression, and disease-specific markers such as ER/PR/HER2 status. We believe that this computational resource will reduce the person-hours required for trial management for a patient, aid in increasing clinical trial enrollment by systematically providing treatment options, and hence an important tool in the clinical application of precision oncology

Cytomegalovirus retinitis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients: A problem worth giving attention to

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis remains the most common ocular opportunistic infection in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome even in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Increased survival of patients on HAART has increased incidence of blindness, which will further increase in the future. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of CMV retinitis and the effect of HAART on the natural history of CMV retinitis in patients referred from ART center. Materials and Methods: Patients with baseline/current CD4 counts <150 cells/µl were evaluated for CMV retinitis. Complete ophthalmological evaluation was carried out and records of CD4 counts, HAART regime, presence of any form of CMV retinitis and response to HAART were noted. Results: Out of 800 patients registered with CD4 <150 cells/µl in ART center, 100 patients reached us. Among these, CMV retinitis was observed in 15% patients, with median CD4 count at the time of examination being 56 cells/µl (range: 24-306 cells/µl). 66.67% patients were HAART non-responders and 63.6% eyes were economically blind. Conclusion: CMV retinitis occurs even in patients with higher CD4 counts. Timely diagnosis and intervention of this treatable condition can reduce the number of blinding years in these young patients who otherwise live longer as a result of HAART

The Patient and Clinician Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Related Adverse Events Associated with Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) call for treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) early in the disease to prevent relapses and accumulation of neurologic impairment and disability. However, patients taking certain oral DMTs may experience gastrointestinal (GI)-related adverse events (AEs), particularly at dose titration. We conducted qualitative research with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients in Canada to contextualize their experiences with three oral DMTs: dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera(®)), fingolimod (Gilenya(®)), and teriflunomide (Aubagio(®)). The objectives of this study were to (1) gather qualitative data to better understand the patient and HCP experience of GI AEs in oral MS DMT treatment in Canada and (2) determine to what extent two patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments used in recent oral DMT trials capture what is important to patients regarding GI AEs in oral MS DMT treatment (content validity) and to provide qualitative data to help interpret PRO scores. METHODS: This was a qualitative, non-interventional, descriptive, cross-sectional study comprising HCP and patient interviews conducted in English and French, using a 1:1 semi-structured interview approach. RESULTS: Patients reported 16 unique GI AE concepts related to oral DMTs. The most commonly reported symptoms were diarrhea, indigestion, and nausea. While patients acknowledged the negative impact associated with GI-related AEs, most characterized the treatment experience as positive, focusing on preference for oral administration, perceived efficacy of DMTs in terms of lack of MS relapses, slowed progression of their disease, and improvement in MS symptoms. Results supported the content validity (relevance, comprehension, and comprehensiveness) of the two PROs assessed. HCP feedback reinforced patient perspectives on both GI concepts and the two PRO instruments. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of these research activities include experiential data on the symptom and impact experience of oral DMTs in MS from both patients and HCPs that contribute to the process of determining therapeutic value. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02250-x

Efficacy and Safety Outcomes with Diroximel Fumarate After Switching from Prior Therapies or Continuing on DRF: Results from the Phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is an oral fumarate for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) with the same active metabolite as dimethyl fumarate (DMF). DRF has a safety/efficacy profile similar to DMF but with improved gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and low (\u3c 1%) treatment discontinuation due to GI adverse events (AEs). Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients who switched to DRF from other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have not been evaluated. METHODS: EVOLVE-MS-1 is an ongoing, 2-year, open-label, phase 3 study of DRF in adults with relapsing-remitting MS. Patients either entered as newly enrolled to DRF trials, or from the 5-week, randomized, head-to-head, phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-2 study of DRF and DMF. This analysis evaluated safety and GI tolerability in patients continuing on DRF (DRF-rollover) or switching from DMF (DMF-rollover) following EVOLVE-MS-2. Safety and efficacy were evaluated in a subset of newly enrolled patients who had received prior glatiramer acetate (GA; GA/DRF) or interferons (IFN; IFN/DRF) as their most recent DMT, prior to switching to DRF in EVOLVE-MS-1. RESULTS: As of September 1, 2020, 1057 patients were enrolled in EVOLVE-MS-1, including 166, 182, 239, and 225 patients in the GA/DRF, IFN/DRF, DRF-rollover, and DMF-rollover groups, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to GI AEs was \u3c 1% in all groups. GA/DRF and IFN/DRF patients experienced improvements from baseline in clinical and radiological efficacy outcomes, including significantly reduced annualized relapse rates. Rollover patients had low rates of new or recurrent GI AEs (DRF-rollover, 26.8%/4.2%; DMF-rollover, 27.1%/4.9%). CONCLUSION: After 2 years of DRF exposure, patients with prior GA, IFN, or fumarate treatment had safety outcomes consistent with previous fumarate studies. Efficacy in patients with prior GA or IFN treatment was consistent with previous fumarate studies. The data suggest that transition to DRF from GA, IFN, or DMF is a reasonable treatment strategy, with low rates of discontinuation due to GI AEs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02634307). INFOGRAPHIC