9 research outputs found

    Mechanisms of enterococcus faecalis-mediated Immunomodulation

    No full text
    Enterococci are a major cause of hospital-acquired infections with Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium frequently found as a component of chronic, polymicrobial infections alongside other bacteria. This study explores interactions between innate immune cells and E. faecalis, with a focus on identifying both effective responses deployed by these cells to eliminate the bacteria, as well as specific immunomodulating mechanisms utilized by E. faecalis to evade clearance. E. faecalis induced large amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in neutrophils. When co-infection with potent NET-inducer S. aureus, E. faecalis both reduced S. aureus-induced NETosis and promoted S. aureus survival. This points to the possible collaboration mechanisms underpinning the persistence of chronic, polymicrobial infection with these two bacterial strains. E. faecalis was reported to suppress LPS-induced NF-κB activation, so a transposon library screening was conducted to identify the mutants that failed to reach a similar level of activity reduction. This screen identified that shikimic acid pathway promoted E. faecalis-driven cytotoxicity in macrophages, likely by inducing apoptosis and thus reduced the overall immune activity such as cytokine production. Collectively, these findings provide clues behind the high correlation of E. faecalis with S. aureus in persistent polymicrobial infections. It furthermore illustrated key mechanisms utilized by E. faecalis to subvert the antimicrobial mechanisms of both murine neutrophils and macrophages directly. These findings have important implications for our understanding of E. faecalis host-pathogen interactions, most importantly through the identification of potential targets which may serve to interrupt E. faecalis immune evasion.Doctor of Philosoph

    Cost-effectiveness of Drug-eluting Stents in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

    No full text
    Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been shown to reduce in-stent restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) in large clinical trials. We conducted this study to elucidate the differences in the cost and clinical outcome of DESs and bare metal stents (BMSs). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and costs of patients with stable angina treated with coronary stents from September 2003 to January 2005 at the National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Results: We enrolled 186 patients treated with DESs and 194 patients treated with BMSs. The use of DESs is associated with a lower rate of TVR compared with that with BMSs (12% vs. 22%, p = 0.011). Compared with the BMS group, the overall costs were significantly higher in the DES group (NT352,495±140,408vs.NT352,495 ± 140,408 vs. NT298,947 ± 131,289, p<0.001). The incremental cost to avoid one TVR at 2 years was NT546,444(95546,444 (95% confidence interval: NT151,071-2,565,793). Conclusion: The use of DESs reduces the rate of TVR at 2 years after intervention, but is probably not cost-effective compared with BMSs in patients with stable coronary artery disease

    Usefulness of Drug Eluting Stent in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention—A Single Center Experience in Taiwan

    No full text
    Drug eluting stents (DES) have been shown to reduce in-stent restenosis rate and target vessel revascularization in large clinical trials. However, the safety and efficacy of DES use in the Taiwanese population has not been reported. We designed this trial to analyze the clinical results in patients using DES in a single tertiary center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of all patients treated at National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, with sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents between September 2003 and January 2005. Results: A total of 585 patients (466 men, 119 women; mean age, 64.5 ± 11.2 years) were enrolled. Meanwhile, 205 sirolimus- and 717 paclitaxel-eluting stents were implanted, with a mean of 1.6 stents per patient. Half (50.2%) of the stents were placed in the left anterior descending artery. Among the enrolled patients, 41.8% had diabetes mellitus, 25% had a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, and 10.7% was treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Overall 8-month target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac event rate, and cardiac death rate were 8.8%, 9.7% and 2.5%, respectively. There was no difference in clinical events between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents. The overall subacute stent thrombosis rate was 1.36%, significantly lower than that in patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome (4%). Conclusion: The use of DES in the Taiwanese population yielded comparable results as those in large clinical trials. Subacute stent thrombosis rate was higher in acute coronary syndrome. The safety of DES in these situations should be further clarified
    corecore