Intensive lipid-lowering strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Department of Internal Medicine, Utrecht University Hospital, The Netherlands. AIMS: To assess the feasibility of an intensive lipid-lowering strategy in diabetic subjects pursuing target plasma lipid levels. METHODS: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), Type 1 or 2, with plasma lipid levels exceeding target values (LDL-cholesterol 0.9 mmol/l for men and > 1.1 mmol/l for women) were eligible. After 6-12 weeks of diet and glycaemic control, lipid-lowering medication (simvastatin/gemfibrozil/acipimox) was prescribed in steps of incremental dosages and combinations for 30 weeks. RESULTS: Of all eligible clinic patients, 25% initially responded and finally 12% were entered. Thirty-six patients with Type 1 and 59 with Type 2 DM were studied. Mean baseline lipid levels in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic subjects were: LDL-cholesterol 3.6 and 3.7 mmol/l, triglycerides 1.7 and 2.2 mmol/l, HDL-cholesterol for men 1.1 and 1.0 mmol/l, and for women 1.4 and 1.2 mmol/l, respectively. All three target values were reached in 66% of the patients. LDL-cholesterol was reduced by 1.2 mmol/l in Type 1 and 1.3 mmol/l in Type 2 diabetic patients and triglycerides by 0.7 mmol/l and 1.1 mmol/l, respectively. HDL-cholesterol increased by 0.15 mmol/l and 0.34 mmol/l in men and women with Type 1 diabetes mellitus, respectively. The cholesterol-triglyceride ratio decreased significantly in VLDL in Type 1 diabetes and in IDL in Type 2 diabetes and increased significantly in HDL in Type 2 DM. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of subjects eligible for intensive lipid lowering agreed to participate in a feasibility study, suggesting a potentially large compliance problem for a general lipid-lowering programme in a diabetes clinic. Nevertheless, intensive lipid lowering with drug combinations can attain the recommended target lipid levels in 66% of subjects with diabetes. With this strategy the plasma lipoprotein composition shifts towards a less atherogenic profile. Subjects with diabetes should therefore receive lipid-lowering therapy tailored to reach target levels, rather than standard dosages, in order to reduce atherogenic risk. Publication Types: Clinical Tria

A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee

Many clinical trials have evaluated the benefit of long-term use of antiplatelet drugs in reducing the risk of clinical thrombotic events. Aspirin and ticlopidine have been shown to be effective, but both have potentially serious adverse effects. Clopidogrel, a new thienopyridine derivative similar to ticlopidine, is an inhibitor of platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate. METHODS: CAPRIE was a randomised, blinded, international trial designed to assess the relative efficacy of clopidogrel (75 mg once daily) and aspirin (325 mg once daily) in reducing the risk of a composite outcome cluster of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death; their relative safety was also assessed. The population studied comprised subgroups of patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease manifested as either recent ischaemic stroke, recent myocardial infarction, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Patients were followed for 1 to 3 years. FINDINGS: 19,185 patients, with more than 6300 in each of the clinical subgroups, were recruited over 3 years, with a mean follow-up of 1.91 years. There were 1960 first events included in the outcome cluster on which an intention-to-treat analysis showed that patients treated with clopidogrel had an annual 5.32% risk of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death compared with 5.83% with aspirin. These rates reflect a statistically significant (p = 0.043) relative-risk reduction of 8.7% in favour of clopidogrel (95% Cl 0.3-16.5). Corresponding on-treatment analysis yielded a relative-risk reduction of 9.4%. There were no major differences in terms of safety. Reported adverse experiences in the clopidogrel and aspirin groups judged to be severe included rash (0.26% vs 0.10%), diarrhoea (0.23% vs 0.11%), upper gastrointestinal discomfort (0.97% vs 1.22%), intracranial haemorrhage (0.33% vs 0.47%), and gastrointestinal haemorrhage (0.52% vs 0.72%), respectively. There were ten (0.10%) patients in the clopidogrel group with significant reductions in neutrophils (< 1.2 x 10(9)/L) and 16 (0.17%) in the aspirin group. INTERPRETATION: Long-term administration of clopidogrel to patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease is more effective than aspirin in reducing the combined risk of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. The overall safety profile of clopidogrel is at least as good as that of medium-dose aspirin