13 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Gender differences in the value of ST-segment depression during adenosine stress testing
Previous studies have suggested that ST-segment depression with adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) may be a marker of significant coronary artery disease (CAD). It is unclear if the significance of ST depression differs between men and women. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of ST-segment depression with adenosine radionuclide MPI as a marker of significant CAD in men and women. Consecutive patients who had angina or suspected CAD and underwent an adenosine stress test and subsequent angiography were retrospectively analyzed. The inclusion criteria were met by 959 patients. Mean age was 64 ± 11 years, and 43% were women. ST depression occurred in 7.6% of the cohort and more often in women (64% women vs 36% men, p <0.001). Among men and women, patients with ST-segment depression had a significantly higher peak rate–pressure product, more chest pain, and a higher ejection fraction in response to the adenosine infusion compared with those without ST-segment depression. ST-segment depression occurred more often in the presence of stenotic lesions (≥50% and ≥70%), and left main or 3-vessel disease, regardless of gender. Transient ischemic dilation occurred more often in men with ST-segment depression. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the only significant predictors of left main or 3-vessel CAD were gender, an abnormal result on MPI, transient ischemic dilation, and ST-segment depression. In conclusion, ST-segment depression during adenosine MPI is an important marker of angiographically significant CAD in men and women. The presence of ST-segment depression is associated with left main disease and 3-vessel CAD
Influence of beta-blocker therapy on aortic blood flow in patients with bicuspid aortic valve
In patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), beta-blockers (BB) are assumed to slow ascending aorta (AAo) dilation by reducing wall shear stress (WSS) on the aneurysmal segment. The aim of this study was to assess differences in AAo peak velocity and WSS in BAV patients with and without BB therapy. BAV patients receiving BB (BB+, n = 30, age: 47 +/- A 11 years) or not on BB (BB-, n = 30, age: 46 +/- A 13 years) and healthy controls (n = 15, age: 43 +/- A 11 years) underwent 4D flow MRI for the assessment of in vivo aortic 3D blood flow. Peak systolic velocities and 3D WSS were calculated at the anterior and posterior walls of the AAo. Both patient groups had higher maximum and mean WSS relative to the control group (p = 0.001 to p = 0.04). WSS was not reduced in the BB+ group compared to BB- patients in the anterior AAo (maximum: 1.49 +/- A 0.47 vs. 1.38 +/- A 0.49 N/m(2), p = 0.99, mean: 0.76 +/- A 0.2 vs. 0.74 +/- A 0.18 N/m(2), p = 1.00) or posterior AAo (maximum: 1.45 +/- A 0.42 vs. 1.39 +/- A 0.58 N/m(2), p = 1.00; mean: 0.65 +/- A 0.16 vs. 0.63 +/- A 0.16 N/m(2), p = 1.00). AAo peak velocity was elevated in patients compared to controls (p <0.01) but similar for BB+ and BB- groups (p = 0.42). Linear models identified significant relationships between aortic stenosis severity and increased maximum WSS (beta = 0.186, p = 0.007) and between diameter at the sinus of Valsalva and reduced mean WSS (beta = -0.151, p = 0.045). Peak velocity and systolic WSS were similar for BAV patients irrespective of BB therapy. Further prospective studies are needed to investigate the impact of dosage and duration of BB therapy on aortic hemodynamics and development of aortopath