Evaluation of pharmacokinetics of warfarin from validated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model

Background: Pharmacokinetics of warfarin has not been described in our population. We derived the pharmacokinetic parameters from a validated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. Methods: Patients receiving warfarin for at least 6 months were recruited and their demographic characteristics, prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR), warfarin doses and concomitant drugs were collected. Using a validated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model, we predicted maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), total clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vd) and elimination rate (k). Warfarin sensitive index (WSI) and warfarin composite measures (WCM) were estimated from the dose and INR values. Liver weight was predicted using validated formula. Results: Two-hundred and twenty patients were recruited. The following were the predicted pharmacokinetic parameters: Cmax (mg/L) was 5.8 (0.4); k (L/day) was 1 (0.1); CL (L/day) was 2.1 (0.2); and Vd (L) was 7.6 (0.2). Patients with Cmax and elimination rate outside the mean+1.96 SD had significantly lower WSI and higher WCM. Significant correlations were observed between Cmax with CL, Vd, and k of warfarin. Significant correlations were also observed between CL and Vd of warfarin with liver weight of the study participants. Conclusion: We predicted pharmacokinetic parameters of warfarin from the validated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model in our population. More studies are needed exploring the relationship between various pharmacodynamic indices of warfarin and pharmacokinetic parameters of warfarin

Artemisinin-based combination therapy for treating uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria

Background Plasmodium vivax is an important cause of malaria in many parts of Asia and South America, and parasite resistance to the standard treatment (chloroquine) is now high in some parts of Oceania. This review aims to assess the current treatment options in the light of increasing chloroquine resistance. Objectives To compare artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) with alternative antimalarial regimens for treating acute uncomplicated P. vivax malaria. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE; LILACS; and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) up to 28 March 2013 using “vivax” and “arte* OR dihydroarte*” as search terms. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials comparing ACTs versus standard therapy, or comparing alternative ACTs, in adults and children with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We used recurrent parasitaemia prior to day 28 as a proxy for effective treatment of the blood stage parasite, and compared drug treatments using risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used trials following patients for longer than 28 days to assess the duration of the post-treatment prophylactic effect of ACTs. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Main results We included 14 trials, that enrolled 2592 participants, and were all conducted in Asia and Oceania between 2002 and 2011. ACTs versus chloroquine ACTs clear parasites from the peripheral blood quicker than chloroquine monotherapy (parasitaemia after 24 hours of treatment: RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.50, four trials, 1652 participants, high quality evidence). In settings where chloroquine remains effective, ACTs are as effective as chloroquine at preventing recurrent parasitaemias before day 28 (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.90, five trials, 1622 participants, high quality evidence). In four of these trials, recurrent parasitaemias before day 28 were very low following treatment with both chloroquine and ACTs. The fifth trial, from Thailand in 2011, found increased recurrent parasitaemias following treatment with chloroquine (9%), while they remained low following ACT (2%) (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.66, one trial, 437 participants). ACT combinations with long half-lives probably also provide a longer prophylactic effect after treatment, with significantly fewer recurrent parasitaemias between day 28 and day 42 or day 63 (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.82, three trials, 1066 participants, moderate quality evidence). One trial, from Cambodia, Thailand, India and Indonesia, gave additional primaquine to both treatment groups to reduce the risk of spontaneous relapses. Recurrent parasitaemias after day 28 were lower than seen in the trials that did not give primaquine, but the ACT still appeared to have an advantage (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.94, one trial, 376 participants, low quality evidence). ACTs versus alternative ACTs In high transmission settings, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is probably superior to artemether-lumefantrine, artesunate plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and artesunate plus amodiaquine at preventing recurrent parasitaemias before day 28 (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.49, three trials, 334 participants, moderate quality evidence). Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine may also have an improved post-treatment prophylactic effect lasting for up to six weeks, and this effect may be present even when primaquine is also given to achieve radical cure (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.46, two trials, 179 participants, low quality evidence). The data available from low transmission settings is too limited to reliably assess the relative effectiveness of ACTs. Authors' conclusions ACTs appear at least equivalent to chloroquine at effectively treating the blood stage of P. vivax infection. Even in areas where chloroquine remains effective, this finding may allow for simplified protocols for treating all forms of malaria with ACTs. In areas where chloroquine no longer cures the infection, ACTs offer an effective alternative. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is the most studied ACT. It may provide a longer period of post-treatment prophylaxis than artemether-lumefantrine or artesunate plus amodiaquine. This effect may be clinically important in high transmission settings whether primaquine is also given or not

Evaluation of Pharmacogenetics of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Drug Efflux Transporter in Renal Transplants Receiving Immunosuppressants

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, such as CYP3A4, and CYP3A5, P450 oxidoreductase (POR), peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPAR-alpha), and drug transporter (ABCB1) were observed to influence concentrations of immunosuppressants (cyclosporine, everolimus, sirolimus, and tacrolimus) and outcomes in renal transplants. We carried out the present study to evaluate the prevalence and impact of these single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in adult renal transplants. SNPs were evaluated using commercial TaqMan® assays. Serum drug concentrations were estimated using immunoassays. One hundred and forty-six patients were recruited. SNPs in CYP3A5*3 were significantly associated with greater dose-adjusted cyclosporine and tacrolimus concentrations. SNPs in POR*28 were observed with significantly lower dose-adjusted concentrations, particularly with cyclosporine and tacrolimus. ABCB1 homozygous polymorphisms were observed with significantly lower time spent in the therapeutic range with cyclosporine and everolimus/sirolimus. Cyclosporine was observed in a significantly greater proportion of patients with elevated GGT, and SNPs in PPAR-alpha were significantly associated with an increased risk of this adverse event. Hypertriglyceridemia with everolimus was significantly associated with POR*28 polymorphisms. There is a need to validate the influence of these SNPs in a prospective study and develop an algorithm predicting the achievement of target concentrations

Kannan Sridharan's Quick Files

The Quick Files feature was discontinued and it’s files were migrated into this Project on March 11, 2022. The file URL’s will still resolve properly, and the Quick Files logs are available in the Project’s Recent Activity

Clinical trials in Ayurveda: Analysis of clinical trial registry of India

Ayurveda is one of the complementary and alternative systems of medicine requiring generation of high quality evidence for rational practice. Evidence can be generated from study designs and the present study is an attempt to critically assess the registered studies in the field of Ayurveda from clinical trial registry of India. We found low number of trials conducted with more focus required on the quality of these studies to contribute to high quality evidence