Pre- and postoperative need for pituitary hormone replacement in non-adenomatous sellar and parasellar lesions: importance of the sellar encroachment score

From Springer Nature via Jisc Publications RouterHistory: received 2020-04-10, registration 2020-05-27, accepted 2020-05-27, pub-electronic 2020-06-06, online 2020-06-06, pub-print 2020-10Publication status: PublishedFunder: University of ManchesterAbstract: Background: Pre-/postoperative pituitary endocrine deficiencies in patients with sellar/parasellar non-adenomatous lesions are poorly described and studies have not considered the effect of sellar invasion on endocrine outcome. The aim of this study was to relate the need for pituitary hormone replacement pre-/postoperatively, with sellar invasion, in non-adenomatous sellar/parasellar lesions. Methods: Single-centre review of adults with histologically confirmed non-adenomatous sellar/parasellar lesion and follow-up ≥ 3 months or until postop radiotherapy. Pituitary dysfunction was defined by hormone replacement. The sellar encroachment score (0–6) was calculated as the sum of the thirds of radiological encroachment into the sellar region in the coronal and sagittal planes. Multivariate analysis with binary logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with pituitary hormone replacement. Results: One hundred and seventeen patients were included with a median age of 49 years (range 16–84 years) and median follow-up of 13 months. Surgery was trans-sphenoidal (53%), trans-cranial (36%) or a combination (11%). The commonest histology types were meningioma (n = 33, 28%) and craniopharyngioma (n = 20, 17%). The median sellar encroachment score was 6 (range 0–6). Most (n = 86, 74%) did not require pituitary hormone replacement preoperatively. The need for pituitary hormones increased after surgery in 41 (35%) patients. In multivariate analysis, the sellar encroachment score was the only factor predictive of pre- (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.2–5.5; p = 0.01) and postoperative risk of new pituitary hormone replacement (OR = 4.1, 95% CI = 1.7–10.1, p = 0.002). Conclusion: A significant proportion of these patients present with need for pituitary hormone replacement that may worsen postoperatively. The degree of sellar encroachment is predictive of pituitary hormone replacement status pre-/postoperatively

Thoracic arachnoiditis, arachnoid cyst and syrinx formation secondary to myelography with Myodil, 30 years previously

Spinal arachnoiditis can rarely occur following irritation from foreign body substances, including certain oil based contrast agents used for myelography. We describe a patient with thoracic arachnoiditis, arachnoid cyst and syringomyelia, 30 years following a myelogram with Myodil. A 62-year-old female presented with chronic thoraco-lumbar back pain, a spastic paraparesis and sphincter disturbance. She had undergone a myelogram with Myodil, 30 years previously for investigation of back pain. A MRI scan revealed evidence of arachnoiditis, thoracic syringomyelia (T6–T8) and an anteriorly placed, extramedullary, arachnoid cyst at T10–T12, compressing the cord. At surgery, T7–T10 thoracic laminectomies were carried out and syringo- and cysto-subarachnoid shunts were inserted. At 12 months follow-up, the sphincter disturbance, lower limb weakness and mobility problems had almost resolved. Although, the use of oil based contrast agents such as Myodil has been discontinued, the present case illustrates some of the rare sequelae of its use, manifesting decades later. Aggressive surgical intervention produced symptomatic benefit

An audit of audits: are we completing the cycle?

Clinical audit plays an important part in the drive to improve quality of patient care and thus forms a cornerstone of clinical governance. We evaluated the standard of clinical audits conducted by all departments in a teaching hospital between 1996 and 1997. Of a total of 213 audits carried out, 102 (48%) were ‘partial’ and only 29 (14%) were ‘full’. Recommendations for improvement emerged from 134 (63%) of the audits performed. In only 51 audits (24%) was the cycle completed by re-auditing, during the subsequent 3 years. Most departments undertake clinical audits but failure to close the loop undermines their effectiveness and wastes resources

The usefulness of surgical out-patient follow-up from the perspective of the patient, their General Practitioner and Surgeon

AbstractTo evaluate the usefulness of follow-up, a prospective questionnaire study of 100 consecutive patients who attended a general surgical clinic, with an established policy of selective surgical follow-up was carried out. The consultations were thought to be ‘useful’ by 95%, 88% and 68% of patients, General Practitioners (GPs) and Surgeons, respectively. Overall, the consultation resulted in a change in management for 44% of patients. Instead of hospital follow-up, 49% of patients preferred to see their GP. Both patients (91%) and GPs (90%) were in favour of a change from pre-planned follow-up to a system of “open access” to the next clinic if deemed necessary. These data would justify a further move towards follow-up in a primary care setting for selected patients, backed up by “open access” to the next surgical out-patient clinic