Model testing for causal models

Finding cause-effect relationships is the central aim of many studies in the physical, behavioral, social and biological sciences. We consider two well-known mathematical causal models: Structural equation models and causal Bayesian networks. When we hypothesize a causal model, that model often imposes constraints on the statistics of the data collected. These constraints enable us to test or falsify the hypothesized causal model. The goal of our research is to develop efficient and reliable methods to test a causal model or distinguish between causal models using various types of constraints. For linear structural equation models, we investigate the problem of generating a small number of constraints in the form of zero partial correlations, providing an efficient way to test hypothesized models. We study linear structural equation models with correlated errors focusing on the graphical aspects of the models. We provide a set of local Markov properties and prove that they are equivalent to the global Markov property. For causal Bayesian networks, we study equality and inequality constraints imposed on data and investigate a way to use these constraints for model testing and selection. For equality constraints, we formulate an implicitization problem and show how we may reduce the complexity of the problem. We also study the algebraic structure of the equality constraints. For inequality constraints, we present a class of inequality constraints on both nonexperimental and interventional distributions

Polynomial Constraints in Causal Bayesian Networks

We use the implicitization procedure to generate polynomial equality constraints on the set of distributions induced by local interventions on variables governed by a causal Bayesian network with hidden variables. We show how we may reduce the complexity of the implicitization problem and make the problem tractable in certain causal Bayesian networks. We also show some preliminary results on the algebraic structure of polynomial constraints. The results have applications in distinguishing between causal models and in testing causal models with combined observational and experimental data

Local Markov property for models satisfying composition axiom

The local Markov condition for a DAG to be an independence map of a probability distribution is well known. For DAGs with latent variables, represented as bi-directed edges in the graph, the local Markov property may invoke exponential number of conditional independencies. This paper shows that the number of conditional independence relations required may be reduced if the probability distributions satisfy the composition axiom. In certain types of graphs, only linear number of conditional independencies are required. The result has applications in testing linear structural equation models with correlated errors.

The Tension between Korean Environmental Protection Policies and U.S. Investors\u27 Interests Under the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement

South Korea’s low carbon and ‘green growth’ policies possess potential regulatory changes that reduce foreign investors’ interests and legitimate expectations concerning the profitability of their businesses. Although international investment law protects a government’s right to protect legitimate public welfare objectives, such as environmental protection, the investor-State dispute settlement provision allows foreign investors to seek compensation for a country’s law and policies contrary to their interests. On the other hand, investor-State dispute settlement provisions inherently have many problems. Despite the problems, protecting both foreign investors’ interests and States’ regulatory sovereignty is very important. For this reason, this dissertation examined why the tension between foreign investors’ rights and States’ regulatory sovereignty arises and how to solve this tension. This dissertation especially reviewed whether there is a possibility that U.S. investors will bring a claim against South Korea for infringing their property rights, because the Korean government’s environmental measures may amount to an indirect expropriation or a breach of fair and equitable treatment under the KORUS FTA and ultimately suggested ways to reconcile Korean environmental protection policies and U.S. investors’ interests under the KORUS FTA

Model testing for causal models

Finding cause-effect relationships is the central aim of many studies in the physical, behavioral, social and biological sciences. We consider two well-known mathematical causal models: Structural equation models and causal Bayesian networks. When we hypothesize a causal model, that model often imposes constraints on the statistics of the data collected. These constraints enable us to test or falsify the hypothesized causal model. The goal of our research is to develop efficient and reliable methods to test a causal model or distinguish between causal models using various types of constraints. For linear structural equation models, we investigate the problem of generating a small number of constraints in the form of zero partial correlations, providing an efficient way to test hypothesized models. We study linear structural equation models with correlated errors focusing on the graphical aspects of the models. We provide a set of local Markov properties and prove that they are equivalent to the global Markov property. For causal Bayesian networks, we study equality and inequality constraints imposed on data and investigate a way to use these constraints for model testing and selection. For equality constraints, we formulate an implicitization problem and show how we may reduce the complexity of the problem. We also study the algebraic structure of the equality constraints. For inequality constraints, we present a class of inequality constraints on both nonexperimental and interventional distributions.</p