Understanding the functional impact of copy number alterations in breast cancer using a network modeling approach

Copy number alterations (CNAs) are thought to account for 85% of the variation in gene expression observed among breast tumours. The expression of cis-associated genes is impacted by CNAs occurring at proximal loci of these genes, whereas the expression of trans-associated genes is impacted by CNAs occurring at distal loci. While a majority of these CNA-driven genes responsible for breast tumourigenesis are cis-associated, trans-associated genes are thought to further abet the development of cancer and influence disease outcomes in patients. Here we present a network-based approach that integrates copy-number and expression profiles to identify putative cis- and trans-associated genes in breast cancer pathogenesis. We validate these cis- and trans-associated genes by employing them to subtype a large cohort of breast tumours obtained from the METABRIC consortium, and demonstrate that these genes accurately reconstruct the ten subtypes of breast cancer. We observe that individual breast cancer subtypes are driven by distinct sets of cis- and trans-associated genes. Among the cis-associated genes, we recover several known drivers of breast cancer (e.g. CCND1, ERRB2, MDM2 and ZNF703) and some novel putative drivers (e.g. BRF2 and SF3B3). siRNA-mediated knockdown of BRF2 across a panel of breast cancer cell lines showed significant reduction specifically in cell proliferation in HER2+ lines, thereby indicating that BRF2 could be a context-dependent oncogene and potentially targetable in these lines. Among the trans-associated genes, we identify modules of immune-response (CD2, CD19, CD38 and CD79B), mitotic/cell-cycle kinases (e.g. AURKB, MELK, PLK1 and TTK), and DNA-damage response genes (e.g. RFC4 and FEN1).Comment: 23 pages, 2 tables, 7 figure

Platinum-(IV)-derivative satraplatin induced G2/M cell cycle perturbation via p53-p21(waf1/cip1)-independent pathway in human colorectal cancer cells

Platinum-(IV)-derivative satraplatin represents a new generation of orally available anti-cancer drugs that are under development for the treatment of several cancers. Understanding the mechanisms of cell cycle modulation and apoptosis is necessary to define the mode of action of satraplatin. In this study, we investigate the ability of satraplatin to induce cell cycle perturbation, clonogenicity loss and apoptosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells.Platinum-(IV)-derivative satraplatin represents a new generation of orally available anti-cancer drugs that are under development for the treatment of several cancers. Understanding the mechanisms of cell cycle modulation and apoptosis is necessary to define the mode of action of satraplatin. In this study, we investigate the ability of satraplatin to induce cell cycle perturbation, clonogenicity loss and apoptosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells

Germline polymorphisms in an enhancer of PSIP1 are associated with progression-free survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are usually treated with platinum/taxane therapy after cytoreductive surgery but there is considerable inter-individual variation in response. To identify germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that contribute to variations in individual responses to chemotherapy, we carried out a multi-phase genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 1,244 women diagnosed with serous EOC who were treated with the same first-line chemotherapy, carboplatin and paclitaxel. We identified two SNPs (rs7874043 and rs72700653) in TTC39B (best P=7x10-5, HR=1.90, for rs7874043) associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Functional analyses show that both SNPs lie in a putative regulatory element (PRE) that physically interacts with the promoters of PSIP1, CCDC171 and an alternative promoter of TTC39B. The C allele of rs7874043 is associated with poor PFS and showed increased binding of the Sp1 transcription factor, which is critical for chromatin interactions with PSIP1. Silencing of PSIP1 significantly impaired DNA damage-induced Rad51 nuclear foci and reduced cell viability in ovarian cancer lines. PSIP1 (PC4 and SFRS1 Interacting Protein 1) is known to protect cells from stress-induced apoptosis, and high expression is associated with poor PFS in EOC patients. We therefore suggest that the minor allele of rs7874043 confers poor PFS by increasing PSIP1 expression.This project has been supported by a grant from Cancer Australia. The Mayo Clinic GWAS was supported by R01CA114343 (Haplotype-based genome screen for ovarian cancer loci). The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium is supported by a grant from the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund thanks to donations by the family and friends of Kathryn Sladek Smith. The AOCS was supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command under DAMD17-01-1-0729, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (grants 400281, 400413), Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Council Queensland, Cancer Council New South Wales, Cancer Council South Australia, The Cancer Foundation of Western Australia, and Cancer Council Tasmania. G. Chenevix-Trench is a Senior Principal Research fellow of the NHMRC. Y. Lu is funded by NHMRC grant 496675, S. MacGregor is supported by an NHMRC career development award, S. Edwards and J. French are supported by Fellowships from the National Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF) Australia. The QIMR Berghofer groups were supported by NHMRC project grants (1051698 to SM and 1058415 to SLE and JDF) and a Weekend to End Women’s Cancer Research Grant (to SLE). A deFazio is funded by the University of Sydney Cancer Research Fund and A deFazio and PR Harnett are funded by the Cancer Institute NSW through the Sydney-West Translational Cancer Research Centre. B. Gao is supported by NHMRC and Cancer Institute NSW scholarship. KBM and MO’R are funded by CR-UK. The Bavarian study (BAV) was supported by ELAN Funds of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg. HSK would like to thank Ira Schwaab for her tireless work on sample preparation. The Belgian study (BEL) was funded by Nationaal Kankerplan and we would like to thank Gilian Peuteman, Thomas Van Brussel and Dominiek Smeets for technical assistance. The Japanese study (JPN) was funded by a Grant-in-Aid for the Third Term Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm study (ICON)7 trial team would like to thank the Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trial Unit (CTU) at the University of London (UCL), the ICON7 Translational Research Sub-group, and the University of Leeds for their work on the coordination of samples and data from the ICON7 trial. The LAX study (Women’s Cancer Program) was supported by the American Cancer Society Early Detection Professorship (120950-SIOP-06-258-06-COUN) and Entertainment Industry Foundation. Funding for MALOVA (MAL) was provided by research grant RO1 CA 61107 from the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; research grant 94 222 52 from the Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark; and the Mermaid I project. The Mayo Clinic study (MAYO) was supported by R01 CA122443, P50 CA136393. The Oregon study (ORE) was funded by the Sherie Hildreth Ovarian Cancer Research Fund and the OHSU Foundation. We would like to thank all members of Scottish Gynaecological Clinical Trials group and the SCOTROC1 investigators. SCOTROC1 (SRO) was funded by Cancer Research UK, and the SCOTROC biological studies were supported by Cancer Research UK (grant C536/A6689). RSH receives support from NIH/NIGMS grant K08GM089941, NIH/NCI grant R21 CA139278, NIH/NIGMS grant UO1GM61393, University of Chicago Cancer Center Support Grant (#P30 CA14599) and Breast Cancer SPORE Career Development Award.This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Impact Journals via http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.704

Patterns of genomic instability in breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers affecting women. Despite significant improvements in overall survival, it remains a significant cause of death worldwide. Genomic instability (GI) is a hallmark of cancer and plays a pivotal role in breast cancer development and progression. In the past decade, high-throughput technologies have provided a wealth of information that has facilitated the identification of a diverse repertoire of mutated genes and mutational processes operative across cancers. Here, we review recent findings on genomic alterations and mutational processes in breast cancer pathogenesis. Most importantly, we summarize the clinical challenges and opportunities to utilize omics-based signatures for better management of breast cancer patients and treatment decision-making

Mechanisms of genomic instability in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally. Genomic instability (GI) refers to the increased tendency to accrue genomic alterations. It drives heterogeneity and is a hallmark of cancer. Genomic integrity is closely guarded by several mechanisms, including DNA damage checkpoints, the DNA repair machinery, and the mitotic checkpoint. Alterations in these surveillance mechanisms cause GI. In breast cancer, several pathways maintaining genomic integrity are distinctly altered, including some that have been successfully exploited for therapeutic targeting. In this review, we comprehensively discuss the recent advances on the mechanisms of GI in breast cancer, highlighting DNA repair defects and chromosome segregation errors during mitosis. We further review the clinical implications and therapeutic potential of targeting GI in the era of precision medicine

The metastasis suppressor RARRES3 as an endogenous inhibitor of the immunoproteasome expression in breast cancer cells

In breast cancer metastasis, the dynamic continuum involving pro-and anti-inflammatory regulators can become compromised. Over 600 genes have been implicated in metastasis to bone, lung or brain but how these genes might contribute to perturbation of immune function is poorly understood. To gain insight, we adopted a gene co-expression network approach that draws on the functional parallels between naturally occurring bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) and cancer stem cells (CSCs). Our network analyses indicate a key role for metastasis suppressor RARRES3, including potential to regulate the immunoproteasome (IP), a specialized proteasome induced under inflammatory conditions. Knockdown of RARRES3 in near-normal mammary epithelial and breast cancer cell lines increases overall transcript and protein levels of the IP subunits, but not of their constitutively expressed counterparts. RARRES3 mRNA expression is controlled by interferon regulatory factor IRF1, an inducer of the IP, and is sensitive to depletion of the retinoid-related receptor RORA that regulates various physiological processes including immunity through modulation of gene expression. Collectively, these findings identify a novel regulatory role for RARRES3 as an endogenous inhibitor of IP expression, and contribute to our evolving understanding of potential pathways underlying breast cancer driven immune modulation