ISRCTN12125882 - Influence of topical anti-VEGF (Ranibizumab) on the outcome of filtration surgery for glaucoma - Study Protocol

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Excessive wound healing, with scarring of the episcleral tissue or encapsulation of the filtering bleb is the main reason for failure in trabeculectomy. Ranibizumab, an inhibitor of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), is seen as a promising candidate to prevent or treat extensive wound healing. We describe the design of a two phased study, i) assessing the local tolerability and safety of topical ranibizumab and ii) assessing the efficacy of topical ranibizumab against placebo in patients who underwent trabeculectomy with mitomycin C combined with phacoemulsification and intra ocular lens (IOL) implantation.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>In the first phase five patients that had trabeculectomy with mitomycin C combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation will be treated with topical ranibizumab (Lucentis^®) eye drops (2 mg/ml) four times daily for one month. The treatment will be started at the first postoperative day. Patients will be assessed for local and systemic side effects using a standardised schedule. In the second phase, after successful completion of phase 1, consenting eligible patients who underwent trabeculectomy with mitomycin C combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation will be randomised to either receive topical ranibizumab eye drops (2 mg/ml) four times daily for 1 month or placebo (BSS 4x/d for 1 month). Patients will be reviewed weekly for 4 weeks until conjunctival sutures are removed. Further follow up examinations are planned after 3 and six months. Assessment of differences in the intraocular eye pressure will be considered primary, and bleb appearance/vascularisation using a standardized photography and the Moorfields bleb grading system, postoperative intraocular pressure and conjunctival wound healing problems will be considered secondary outcome parameters.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Anti-VEGF-antibodies might be more effective in preventing scaring and might have fewer toxic side effects than the currently used anti-metabolites and may replace them in the long term.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ISRCTN: <a href="http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN12125882">ISRCTN12125882</a></p

Intracameral bevacizumab and mitomycin C Trabeculectomy for eyes with neovascular glaucoma: a case series

The purpose of this study was to describe the surgical outcomes and safety of intracameral bevacizumab during trabeculectomy in eyes with neovascular glaucoma. Pilot study included four eyes (four patients) with refractory neovascular glaucoma submitted to fornix-based trabeculectomy with adjunctive use of bevacizumab in the anterior chamber during the procedure. Patients were previously treated with panretinal photocoagulation as standard therapy. Variables evaluated were intraocular pressure, bleb appearance, iris neovascularization, intraoperative/postoperative complications, and visual outcomes. No intraoperative complication was observed. The mean follow-up period was 12.75 (range, 12–15 months). All eyes showed significant intraocular pressure control postoperatively. Iris neovascularization reduced significantly within 1 month after surgery. Mild anterior chamber inflammation was observed during follow-up in all eyes. No significant postoperative complication was observed, and no patient presented visual acuity deterioration. Intracameral bevacizumab may be used as an adjunctive therapy during trabeculectomy in eyes with neovascular glaucoma

A 6-Month Study Comparing Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of the Preservative-free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% versus Each of Its Individual Preservative-Free Components

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of the preservative-free (PF) fixed combination (FC) of tafluprost 0.0015\% and timolol 0.5\% (once daily) were compared to those of the individual components (PF tafluprost 0.0015\% once daily and PF timolol 0.5\% twice daily) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension inadequately controlled on prior timolol or prostaglandin monotherapy for 6\ua0months.A stratified, double-masked, randomized, multicenter phase III study was conducted. A total of 189 prior timolol users were randomized within the timolol stratum (TS) to receive either FC (n\ua0=\ua095) or timolol 0.5\% (TIM; n\ua0=\ua094). Furthermore, a total of 375 prior prostaglandin analog (PGA) users were randomized within the prostaglandin stratum (PS) to receive either FC (n\ua0=\ua0188) or tafluprost 0.0015\% (TAF; n\ua0=\ua0187). To be eligible for participation in the study, the patients were required to have an intraocular pressure (IOP) of\ua0 6522\ua0mmHg when on timolol (TIM) or of\ua0 6520\ua0mmHg when on PGA in either treated eye at the screening and end-of-run-in visits. In addition to these, the study included visits at baseline, 2 and 6\ua0weeks, 3 and 6\ua0months and at a post-study visit. IOP was measured at 8 a.m., 10 a.m., 4 p.m., and 8 p.m.In the TS, a significant reduction from baseline IOP was seen with FC and TIM throughout the study. Average diurnal IOP change from baseline at month 3 was -8.55\ua0mmHg (32\%) for FC and -7.35\ua0mmHg (28\%) for TIM. The model-based treatment difference (FC-TIM) was -0.885\ua0mmHg [95\% confidence interval (CI) -1.745 to -0.024; p\ua0=\ua00.044] demonstrating the superiority of FC over TIM. In the PS, a significant reduction in IOP was seen with both FC and TAF throughout the study. The average diurnal IOP change from baseline at month 3 was -8.61\ua0mmHg (33\%) for FC and -7.23\ua0mmHg (28\%) for TAF. The model-based treatment difference (FC-TAF) was -1.516\ua0mmHg (95\% CI -2.044 to -0.988; p\ua0<\ua00.001) demonstrating the superiority of FC over TAF. In the TS, related ocular adverse events (AEs) were more frequent for patients treated with FC compared to TIM (16.8\% versus 6.4\%), whereas related non-ocular AEs were more frequent with TIM compared to FC (2.1\% versus 0.0\%). In the PS, AEs were similarly distributed between FC and TAF. The frequency of conjunctival hyperemia of FC was low (6.4\%).The preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost and timolol provided a substantial and significant IOP reduction in both strata. The IOP reduction was superior to both tafluprost 0.0015\% and timolol 0.5\% when given as monotherapies. Overall, the study treatments were safe and well tolerated.Santen Oy, Tampere, Finland

Preclinical Investigation of Ab Interno Goniotomy Using Three Different Techniques

David A Ammar,1 Eric Porteous,2 Malik Y Kahook3 1Research Department, Lions World Vision Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; 2New World Medical, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA; 3Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USACorrespondence: Malik Y Kahook, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA, Tel +1 720 848 2501, Email [email protected]: To evaluate incisional or excisional tissue-level effects of ab interno goniotomy techniques on human trabecular meshwork (TM).Methods: The TM from human cadaveric corneal rim tissue was treated using three devices: (1) Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) GLIDE, (2) iAccess, and (3) SION. Two human corneal rims were used for each of the iAccess and SION devices and one with the KDB GLIDE, with 360 degrees of TM treated in each case. Sections were then prepared for analysis and comparison between devices. Tissue samples underwent standard histologic processing with H&amp;E stain, followed by comparative analyses.Results: Areas treated with the KDB GLIDE device resulted in nearly complete excision of TM overlying the canal of Schlemm without injury to surrounding tissues. The iAccess device can be used as a focal trephine to create holes or dragged for TM disruption. When used to create holes, iAccess punched through the full thickness of the TM and also disrupted the anterior scleral tissue. It caused some incisional openings through the TM but with significant leaflets remaining and minimal true &ldquo;hole-punch&rdquo; effect. When the device tip was dragged, iAccess incised the TM and left debris behind with little, if any, excision of tissue. SION led to both incision and excision of TM with incision predominating over excision.Conclusion: The various methods evaluated to perform ab interno goniotomy resulted in varying degrees of TM incision or excision. Only the KDB GLIDE device resulted in reliable excision of TM, while the other devices produced incision or minimal excision of tissue with residual leaflets and debris. Use of iAccess resulted in focal disruption of the anterior scleral wall. Because incisional approaches that leave longer residual leaflets may be more prone to fibrosis and closure compared to excisional treatments, clinical correlation will be necessary to better understand the significance of these findings with respect to relative effectiveness of intraocular pressure lowering in eyes with glaucoma.Keywords: glaucoma, goniotomy, excision, incision, trabecular meshwor