Experience at a Tertiary Center in the First 11 Months of the Pandemic

This study aimed to evaluate the experience of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients in a Southern Europe tertiary hospital. Retrospective observational study in tracheostomized patients from April 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021. Data related to tracheostomy were evaluated in patients with and without COVID-19, including infections in healthcare professionals involved in patient care. Forty-two tracheostomies were performed in COVID-19 patients aged 68.4 ± 11.1 years, predominantly men (71%) and caucasians (81%). They had at least 1 comorbidity (93%), on average 3. The most frequent were heart disease (71%), age > 65 years (67%) diabetes (40%) and obesity (33%). The greater number of comorbidities was associated with the lesser probability of the patient's recovery (p =.001). Age (p =.047) and renal failure (p =.013) were associated with higher mortality. Patients were tracheostomized by prolonged endo-tracheal intubation (50%), pneumonia (33%) and extubation failure (10%). Ventilation time before the tracheostomy (22.9 ± 6.5 days) was higher than ventilation time after the tracheostomy (7.1 ± 15.1 days) (p < 0.001). No differences were found in ventilation time (p = 0.094) and tracheostomy time (p = 0.514) in the different indications. There were 3 minor complications (7.1%), 25 discharges (60%) and 11 deaths (26%). During the same period 49 tracheostomies were performed in patients without COVID-19, with a homogeneous gender and age distribution, 31% without comorbidities, with an average of 1 comorbidity per patient and higher mortality (43%). Tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients proved to be a safe procedure for both patients and healthcare professionals and improves the clinical outcome of patients with severe infection. The 21-day procedure timing seems adequate. Comorbidities played an essential role in patient´s recovery. Age and renal failure are associated with a worse vital prognosis.publishersversionpublishe

Adaptação e Validação para Português Europeu das Escalas Categories Auditory Performance-II e Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale em Crianças com Implante Coclear

Introdução: As escalas Categories of Auditory Performance II (CAP-II) e Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) são questionários simples e de rápida aplicação que permitem avaliar o desempenho auditivo de crianças com implante coclear (IC). O objetivo deste estudo foi a tradução, adaptação e validação da versão em português europeu das escalas CAP-II e IT-MAIS. Métodos: Um total de 85 participantes completaram a versão em português europeu dos questionários CAP-II e IT-MAIS, dos quais 45 eram pais de crianças com IC pediátrico (9,84 ± 4,22 anos) e outros 40 eram pais de crianças com audição normal (8,35 ± 3,56 anos). Foi avaliada a reprodutibilidade entre avaliadores, a reprodutibilidade teste-reteste, a comparação dos resultados do grupo de estudo versus grupo de controlo, a consistência interna e a correlação das novas escalas. Resultados: As escalas CAP-II e IT-MAIS apresentaram uma elevada confiabilidade e reprodutibilidade, respetivamente com coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (ICC) de 0,979 (p 0,05). Conclusão: A versão em português europeu destas escalas demonstrou ser uma ferramenta válida e confiável na avaliação do desempenho auditivo em crianças falantes de português europeu com deficiência auditiva

Relatório estágio profissional

Relatório final do estágio profissionalizante do 6.º ano

Relatório estágio profissional

Relatório final do estágio profissionalizante do 6.º ano

Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Contributions to the Validation of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) for European Portuguese

Publisher Copyright: © 2022 CELOM. All rights reserved.Introduction: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) scale uses a simple and easily administered questionnaire to evaluate the adaptation of individuals to their cochlear implants. The aim of this study was to validate the NCIQ for European Portuguese, through its translation and cultural adaptation. It also presents the evaluation of reproducibility and the description of the results of this questionnaire in patients using IC. Material and Methods: Fifty postlingually deaf adult multichannel cochlear implant users (uni- or bilateral) participated in the study. Participants used the cochlear implant for at least 12 months and were patients of the Department of Otolaryngology at the Egas Moniz Hospital in Lisbon. Permission, as well the guidelines for translation, were obtained from the authors of the scale. Translation and cultural adaptation were carried out, in addition to the evaluation of reproducibility and internal consistency. Results: The participants were 44.0% male and 56.0% female, aged between 20 and 79 years (55.50 ± 15.69). The results of the study showed an overall level of satisfaction of 65.07 among cochlear implants users. The level of satisfaction of the subdomains was 64.40 in basic sound perception, 71.35 in advanced sound perception, 57.91 in speech production, 59.05 in self-esteem, 69.75 in activity and 68.50 in social functioning. Internal consistency (Cronbach α score = 0.96) and test-retest reliability coefficients proved to be strong. Furthermore, the questionnaire’s overall and subdomains average scores did not differ significantly from the results obtained with the original scale. Conclusion: This adaptation of the NCIQ questionnaire for European Portuguese should be considered a good tool to evaluate the level of satisfaction of cochlear implant users and, so far, it is the only scale in this field validated for application in the Portuguese population.publishersversionpublishe