4 research outputs found
Response of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from Arctic tundra soils to a multifactorial manipulation of water table, temperature and thaw depth
Significant uncertainties persist concerning how Arctic soil tundra carbon emission responds to
environmental changes. In this study, 24 cores were sampled from drier (high centre polygons and
rims) and wetter (low centre polygons and troughs) permafrost tundra ecosystems. We examined
how soil CO2 and CH4 fluxes responded to laboratory-based manipulations of soil temperature
(and associated thaw depth) and water table depth, representing current and projected conditions
in the Arctic. Similar soil CO2 respiration rates occurred in both the drier and the wetter sites,
suggesting that a significant proportion of soil CO2 emission occurs via anaerobic respiration
under water-saturated conditions in these Arctic tundra ecosystems. In the absence of vegetation,
soil CO2 respiration rates decreased sharply within the first 7 weeks of the experiment, while CH4
emissions remained stable for the entire 26 weeks of the experiment. These patterns suggest that
soil CO2 emission is more related to plant input than CH4 production and emission. The stable
and substantial CH4 emission observed over the entire course of the experiment suggests that
temperature limitations, rather than labile carbon limitations, play a predominant role in CH4
production in deeper soil layers. This is likely due to the presence of a substantial source of labile
carbon in these carbon-rich soils. The small soil temperature difference (a median difference of
1
â—¦C) and a more substantial thaw depth difference (a median difference of 6 cm) between the high
and low temperature treatments resulted in a non-significant difference between soil CO2 and CH4
emissions. Although hydrology continued to be the primary factor influencing CH4 emissions,
these emissions remained low in the drier ecosystem, even with a water table at the surface. This
result suggests the potential absence of a methanogenic microbial community in high-centre
polygon and rim ecosystems. Overall, our results suggest that the temperature increases reported
for these Arctic regions are not responsible for increases in carbon losses. Instead, it is the changes
in hydrology that exert significant control over soil CO2 and CH4 emissions
Vegetation Type Dominates the Spatial Variability in CH<inf>4</inf> Emissions Across Multiple Arctic Tundra Landscapes
Methane (CH4) emissions from Arctic tundra are an important feedback to global climate. Currently, modelling and predicting CH4 fluxes at broader scales are limited by the challenge of upscaling plot-scale measurements in spatially heterogeneous landscapes, and by uncertainties regarding key controls of CH4 emissions. In this study, CH4 and CO2 fluxes were measured together with a range of environmental variables and detailed vegetation analysis at four sites spanning 300 km latitude from Barrow to Ivotuk (Alaska). We used multiple regression modelling to identify drivers of CH4 flux, and to examine relationships between gross primary productivity (GPP), dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and CH4 fluxes. We found that a highly simplified vegetation classification consisting of just three vegetation types (wet sedge, tussock sedge and other) explained 54% of the variation in CH4 fluxes across the entire transect, performing almost as well as a more complex model including water table, sedge height and soil moisture (explaining 58% of the variation in CH4 fluxes). Substantial CH4 emissions were recorded from tussock sedges in locations even when the water table was lower than 40 cm below the surface, demonstrating the importance of plant-mediated transport. We also found no relationship between instantaneous GPP and CH4 fluxes, suggesting that models should be cautious in assuming a direct relationship between primary production and CH4 emissions. Our findings demonstrate the importance of vegetation as an integrator of processes controlling CH4 emissions in Arctic ecosystems, and provide a simplified framework for upscaling plot scale CH4 flux measurements from Arctic ecosystems
Methane and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes from a European Alpine Fen Over the Snow-Free Period
ISSN:0277-5212ISSN:1943-624