8 research outputs found
A survey of green plant tRNA 3'-end processing enzyme tRNase Zs, homologs of the candidate prostate cancer susceptibility protein ELAC2
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>tRNase Z removes the 3'-trailer sequences from precursor tRNAs, which is an essential step preceding the addition of the CCA sequence. tRNase Z exists in the short (tRNase Z<sup>S</sup>) and long (tRNase Z<sup>L</sup>) forms. Based on the sequence characteristics, they can be divided into two major types: bacterial-type tRNase Z<sup>S </sup>and eukaryotic-type tRNase Z<sup>L</sup>, and one minor type, <it>Thermotoga maritima </it>(TM)-type tRNase Z<sup>S</sup>. The number of tRNase Zs is highly variable, with the largest number being identified experimentally in the flowering plant <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>. It is unknown whether multiple tRNase Zs found in <it>A. thaliana </it>is common to the plant kingdom. Also unknown is the extent of sequence and structural conservation among tRNase Zs from the plant kingdom.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We report the identification and analysis of candidate tRNase Zs in 27 fully sequenced genomes of green plants, the great majority of which are flowering plants. It appears that green plants contain multiple distinct tRNase Zs predicted to reside in different subcellular compartments. Furthermore, while the bacterial-type tRNase Z<sup>S</sup>s are present only in basal land plants and green algae, the TM-type tRNase Z<sup>S</sup>s are widespread in green plants. The protein sequences of the TM-type tRNase Z<sup>S</sup>s identified in green plants are similar to those of the bacterial-type tRNase Z<sup>S</sup>s but have distinct features, including the TM-type flexible arm, the variant catalytic HEAT and HST motifs, and a lack of the PxKxRN motif involved in CCA anti-determination (inhibition of tRNase Z activity by CCA), which prevents tRNase Z cleavage of mature tRNAs. Examination of flowering plant chloroplast tRNA genes reveals that many of these genes encode partial CCA sequences. Based on our results and previous studies, we predict that the plant TM-type tRNase Z<sup>S</sup>s may not recognize the CCA sequence as an anti-determinant.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our findings substantially expand the current repertoire of the TM-type tRNase Z<sup>S</sup>s and hint at the possibility that these proteins may have been selected for their ability to process chloroplast pre-tRNAs with whole or partial CCA sequences. Our results also support the coevolution of tRNase Zs and tRNA 3'-trailer sequences in plants.</p
Motif co-regulation and co-operativity are common mechanisms in transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational regulation
A substantial portion of the regulatory interactions in the higher eukaryotic cell are mediated by simple sequence motifs in the regulatory segments of genes and (pre-)mRNAs, and in the intrinsically disordered regions of proteins. Although these regulatory modules are physicochemically distinct, they share an evolutionary plasticity that has facilitated a rapid growth of their use and resulted in their ubiquity in complex organisms. The ease of motif acquisition simplifies access to basal housekeeping functions, facilitates the co-regulation of multiple biomolecules allowing them to respond in a coordinated manner to changes in the cell state, and supports the integration of multiple signals for combinatorial decision-making. Consequently, motifs are indispensable for temporal, spatial, conditional and basal regulation at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational level. In this review, we highlight that many of the key regulatory pathways of the cell are recruited by motifs and that the ease of motif acquisition has resulted in large networks of co-regulated biomolecules. We discuss how co-operativity allows simple static motifs to perform the conditional regulation that underlies decision-making in higher eukaryotic biological systems. We observe that each gene and its products have a unique set of DNA, RNA or protein motifs that encode a regulatory program to define the logical circuitry that guides the life cycle of these biomolecules, from transcription to degradation. Finally, we contrast the regulatory properties of protein motifs and the regulatory elements of DNA and (pre-)mRNAs, advocating that co-regulation, co-operativity, and motif-driven regulatory programs are common mechanisms that emerge from the use of simple, evolutionarily plastic regulatory modules