19 research outputs found

    Arthroscopic meniscal repair with an absorbable screw: results and surgical technique

    No full text
    The results of a new method for arthroscopic all-inside meniscus repair using a biodegradable cannulated screw (Clearfix meniscal screw) were assessed in a medium-term follow-up prospective study. The Clearfix meniscal screw system consists of delivery cannulae, screw driver, and screw implants. After tear debridement, a screw is located on the driver and passed through the cannula to the insertion site, holding the two sides of the tear together under linear compression. Forty-eight patients (48 repairs) with a mean age of 32.7 years were included in the study. Ligament stabilizing procedures were done in 39 patients (81%) who had anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. Only longitudinal lesions in the red/red or red/white zone were repaired. Follow-up averaged 19 months, with a range from 12 to 48 months. Patients were evaluated using clinical examination, the "Orthopaedische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Knie (OAK)" knee evaluation scheme and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Criteria for clinical success included absence of joint-line tenderness, absence of swelling and a negative McMurray test. Postoperatively, there were no complications directly associated with the device. Twelve of 48 repaired menisci (25%) were considered failures according to the above-mentioned criteria. According to the OAK knee evaluation scheme, 38 patients (79%) had an excellent or good result. MRI, however, showed persisting grade III or IV lesions in 35 patients (73%). Analysis showed that age, length of tear, and simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction did not affect the clinical outcome. In contrast, risk factors for failure of meniscus repair are chronicity of injury, location of tear more than 3 mm from the meniscosynovial junction and meniscus side (medial)

    Arthroscopic meniscal repair: a comparative study between three different surgical techniques

    No full text
    The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate and compare the results of arthroscopic meniscal repair using three different techniques. Between January 2002 and March 2004, 57 patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent an arthroscopic meniscal repair. The outside-in technique was used in 17 patients (group A), the inside-out in 20 patients (group B), while the rest of the 20 patients (group Q were managed by the all-inside technique using the Mitek RapidLoc soft tissue anchor (Mitek Surgical Products, Westwood, MA, USA). Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction was performed in 29 patients (51%). The criteria for clinical success included absence of joint line tenderness, locking, swelling, and a negative McMurray test. The minimum follow-up was one year for all groups. The mean follow-up was 23 months for group A, 22 months for group B, and 22 months for group C. All meniscal repairs were considered healed according to our criteria in group A, while 19 out of 20 repairs (95%) healed in group B. Finally 7 of 20 repairs (35%) were considered failures in group C and this difference was statistically significant in comparison with other groups. The time required for meniscal repair averaged 38.5 min for group A, 18.1 min for group B, and 13.6 min for group C. Operation time for meniscal repair in group A was statistically longer in comparison with other groups. There were no significant differences among the three groups concerning complications. According to our results, arhtroscopic meniscal repair with the inside-out technique seems to be superior in comparison with the other methods because it offers a high rate of meniscus healing without prolonged operation time

    PAHs: Products of Chemical and Biochemical Transformation of Alicyclic Precursors

    No full text
    corecore