A Case of Right Hepatic Artery Syndrome Diagnosed by Using SpyGlassDSTM System

We report the case of a 68-year-old woman who had abdominal pain and slightly elevated biliary enzymes. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography detected biliary duct stenosis, while contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed that the right hepatic artery transversed the extrahepatic bile duct at the level of bifurcation of the bile duct. We performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and peroral cholangioscopy with the SpyGlass DS? system. Then, mild extrinsic pulsatile compression of the bile duct was observed at stricture level with an intact bile duct epithelium. Therefore, she was diagnosed with right hepatic artery syndrome and underwent cholecystectomy. Six months later, her biliary enzyme level decreased, and the recurrence of pain gradually decreased

Discrimination of stock origin of spawning population of ayu Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis at the Ota River, Hiroshima Prefecture

太田川下流域で採集したアユ産卵群の由来判別を外部形態および耳石Sr：Ca比分析で行った。太田川にて放流された人工種苗の耳石Sr：Ca比のチャートパターンは耳石中心から300μmで減少が認められ，耳石中心から400μm以遠で比が減少する天然型と異なっていた。耳石Sr：Ca 比のチャートパターンに基づくと，産卵群への人工種苗の混入率は28%と考えられた。採集した産卵群の側線上方横列鱗数は13～26枚（n=173）で，側線上方横列鱗数が17枚以下を人工種苗，18枚以上を天然アユと仮定すると，産卵群への人工種苗の混入率は31%と見積もられた。太田川産卵群では概ね3割が放流された人工種苗であると考えられた。Stock discrimination in the spawning population of ayu, Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis in the Ota River, western Japan was conducted using number of scales above the lateral line and otolith Sr:Ca ratio. Chart pattern in otolith Sr:Ca ratio of hatchery-stocked ayu was different in amphidromous form. Based on chart pattern of otolith Sr:Ca ratio, mixing ratio of hatchery-stocked ayu to the spawning population was estimated at 28%. Number of scales above the lateral line of spawning population marked from 13 to 26 (n=173). Based on number of scales above the lateral line (hatchery-stocked ayu ≦ 17; amphidromous ≧ 18), the mixing ratio of hatchery-stocked ayu was estimated 31%. Consequently, the contribution ratio of hatchery-stocked ayu to the spawning population was around 30% at the Ota River

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Usefulness of Endoscopic Ultrasound Processor

[Background] Although endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a useful tool for diagnosing pancreatobiliary diseases, not many facilities perform this technique as it is difficult to master. Currently, two new EUS systems exist: EU-ME2/GF-UCT260, manufactured by Olympus, and SU-1/EG-580UT, manufactured by Fujifilm. Some reports have compared new EUS models to older versions, but the operability and image quality of these two latest systems have not been compared. Our study aimed to compare the usefulness of these two types of EUS. [Methods] Forty consecutive patients were recruited and randomized in a two-arm clinical trial; Arm 1: EU-ME2/GF-UCT260 was used only for observation and SU-1/EG-580UT for EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA); Arm 2: SU-1/EG-580UT was used only for observation and EU-ME2/GF-UCT260 for EUS-FNA. Using a crossover design, we evaluated image findings, ease of scope insertion, and visibility of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Each procedure was scored using a 5-point scale (Clinical Trial ID: UMIN000031373). [Results] SU-1/EG-580UT was significantly better in terms of lesion-delineating capacity: lesion border (P < 0.001), internal echo (P < 0.001). Significantly easier scope insertion was observed with SU-1/EG-580UT with respect to any insertion into the piriform recess (P = 0.018), the pylorus ring (P < 0.001), and the superior duodenal angle (P < 0.001). Visibility during gastrointestinal observation was also significantly better with the SU-1/EG-580UT (P < 0.001) than with the EU-ME2/GF-UCT260. [Conclusion] SU-1/EG-580UT EUS demonstrated superior performance during ultrasonic endoscopic GI observation, operability, and ultrasonic image quality. The result of the superior ultrasound imaging quality of SU-1/EG-580UT EUS will aid in the identification of small pancreatic malignancies with unclear borders and prove useful in evaluating mural nodules of IPMN in detail. These findings could result in an increased use of EUS and improve identification and prognosis of patients with pancreatobiliary diseases

Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Safe Tissue Sampling Modality

Few studies have compared the diagnostic utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) tissue sampling for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of EUS-FNA for diagnosing ECC compared with ERCP tissue sampling. Patients who underwent EUS-FNA or ERCP tissue sampling to differentiate ECC from benign biliary disease were enrolled retrospectively between October 2011 and March 2017. We evaluated diagnostic performances of EUS-FNA and ERCP tissue sampling based on pathological evaluation. We compared adverse events in EUS-FNA and ERCP tissue sampling. We enrolled 73 patients with biliary disease and performed EUS-FNA and ERCP in 19 and 54 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ERCP tissue sampling were 76.0%, 100%, and 88.9%, respectively, and for EUS-FNA these were 81.8%, 87.5%, and 84.2%, respectively. Statistical values of ERCP tissue sampling and EUS-FNA were not significantly different. The adverse event frequency of EUS-FNA was significantly lower than that of ERCP tissue sampling (0% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.033). The diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for ECC is similar to that of ERCP tissue sampling. EUS-FNA is a safer tissue sampling modality than ERCP for evaluating biliary disease

Peroral Cholangioscopy-Guided Forceps Biopsy and Endoscopic Scraper for the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Extrahepatic Biliary Stricture

Background: Peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) has become a widely-used technique in diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures, enabling optical viewing of the biliary system and targeted biopsies under direct vision. The diagnostic utility of the new endoscopic scraper, Trefle&reg;, for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) has also been reported. However, the diagnostic utility of POCS-guided and Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition for ECC has never been compared empirically. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition for diagnosing ECC compared with POCS-guided tissue sampling. Methods: Patients who underwent Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition or POCS-guided forceps biopsy to differentiate ECC from benign biliary disease between April 2014 and March 2018 were enrolled retrospectively. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition and POCS-guided forceps biopsy based on pathological evaluation. We also compared adverse events associated with Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition with those of POCS-guided forceps biopsy. Results: We enrolled 34 patients with biliary disease and performed Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition and POCS-guided forceps biopsy in 14 and 20 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition were 87.5%, 83.3%, and 85.7%, respectively, and for POCS-guided forceps biopsy, these were 90.0% each. Statistical values of Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition and POCS-guided tissue acquisition were not significantly different. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of adverse events between the Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition and the POCS-guided forceps biopsy (35.7% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.770). Compared with patients who underwent POCS procedure, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed for fewer patients who underwent Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: The diagnostic ability of Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition for ECC is similar to that of POCS-guided tissue acquisition. Trefle&reg;-assisted tissue acquisition might also help to preserve the sphincter of Oddi and its digestive function

Efficacy and Safety of Pancreatic Juice Cytology with Synthetic Secretin in Diagnosing Malignant Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas

The risk of malignant transformation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is presently assessed using imaging, which remains unsatisfactory. Given the high viscosity of pancreatic juice, pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) is considered an investigational procedure. We previously demonstrated that the diagnostic performance of PJC was improved via synthetic secretin loading in pancreatic ductal carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of synthetic secretin-loaded PJC (S-PJC) for IPMN. The usefulness and safety of S-PJC were prospectively evaluated in 133 patients with IPMN. Overall, 92, 12, and 26 patients had branch duct, main duct, and mixed-type lesions, respectively. The risk classifications based on the 2017 international consensus guidelines were high-risk stigmata, worrisome features, and no risk in 29, 59, and 45 patients, respectively. Synthetic secretin loading improved the sensitivity of PJC from 50.0% to 70.8%. Complications included 13 (9.8%) cases of mild pancreatitis, 1 (0.8%) case of acute cholangitis, and 1 (0.8%) case of Mallory–Weiss syndrome, all of which resolved with conservative treatment. In conclusion, synthetic secretin-loaded PJC improved the diagnostic performance of cytology for malignant IPMN. We recommend using synthetic secretin-loaded PJC for the preoperative pathological diagnosis of malignant IPMN in clinical settings

The Usefulness of Peroral Cholangioscopy for Intrahepatic Stones

Peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) is believed to be effective in treating intrahepatic stones; however, reports on its efficacy are few. We reviewed the results of intrahepatic stones treated with fluoroscopic guidance or POCS. This study included 26 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for intrahepatic stones at our institution between January 2017 and December 2021. We retrospectively evaluated the procedure time and adverse events in the first session and the rate of complete stone removal. Complete stone removal was achieved in 92% (24/26); POCS was required in 16 of 26 (62%) procedures and the complete stone removal was achieved in 15 of 16 (94%) of these procedures. The POCS group had a significantly longer procedure time than the fluoroscopy group. Cholangitis incidence was high; however, no difference was noted between patients with and without POCS, and all cases were mild and treated conservatively. Endoscopic treatment for intrahepatic stones may lead to an increase in the incidence of cholangitis, requires specialized devices such as a cholangioscope, and should be performed in an established institution by experienced staff. POCS is useful for intrahepatic stones formed upstream of the stenosis and intrahepatic stones piled in the bile duct