Five Methods of Breast Volume Measurement: A Comparative Study of Measurements of Specimen Volume in 30 Mastectomy Cases

Background To compare breast volume measurement techniques in terms of accuracy, convenience, and cost. Methods Breast volumes of 30 patients who were scheduled to undergo total mastectomy surgery were measured preoperatively by using five different methods (mammography, anatomic [anthropometric], thermoplastic casting, the Archimedes procedure, and the Grossman-Roudner device). Specimen volume after total mastectomy was measured in each patient with the water displacement method (Archimedes). The results were compared statistically with the values obtained by the five different methods. Results The mean mastectomy specimen volume was 623.5 (range 150–1490) mL. The breast volume values were established to be 615.7 mL (r = 0.997) with the mammographic method, 645.4 mL (r = 0.975) with the anthropometric method, 565.8 mL (r = 0.934) with the Grossman-Roudner device, 583.2 mL (r = 0.989) with the Archimedes procedure, and 544.7 mL (r = 0.94) with the casting technique. Examination of r values revealed that the most accurate method was mammography for all volume ranges, followed by the Archimedes method. Conclusion The present study demonstrated that the most accurate method of breast volume measurement is mammography, followed by the Archimedes method. However, when patient comfort, ease of application, and cost were taken into consideration, the Grossman-Roudner device and anatomic measurement were relatively less expensive, and easier methods with an acceptable degree of accuracy

Breast Volume Asymmetry Value, Ratio, and Cancer Risk

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the criteria for determining the cancer risk of the breast asymmetry by comparing breast volume asymmetry levels between healthy women and women with cancer

Variables affecting patient satisfaction in breast surgery: A cross-sectional sample of Turkish women with breast cancer

WOS: 000243290000004PubMed ID: 17236697Objective: In Turkey, despite the fact that breast cancer accounts for 24.1% of all cancer in women, a very small number of these patients receive breast reconstruction. This low percentage would seem to indicate that there are several factors affecting the decision of which surgical procedure should be selected. The aim of this study was to establish the demographical, medical, and psychological factors associated with the breast cancer patient's decision-making process, and assess their satisfaction with the type of surgery received. Method: We assessed long-term satisfaction with the type of surgery received; satisfaction with the information process by which the surgery decision is taken; feelings of ambivalence or regret regarding the type of surgery received in both mastectomy (n = 50) and breast reconstruction patients (n = 25). Additionally, breast cancer survivors were compared with age-matched healthy control volunteers (n = 50) in terms of demographics, body image and self-esteem, which could be expected to affect their preferences. We administered a demographical and medical information form, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, Clinical Version (SCID-I), the Body Cathexis Scale (BCS); and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Results: In both groups, women with a low income and less education were more likely to experience decision regret or low satisfaction. Moreover, total mastectomy-alone patients had lower self-esteem compared to reconstructive surgery patients and healthy women. Conclusion: Early stage breast cancer is a chronic disease and patients have to live with the consequences of their decision for many years. At the same time, the type of surgery is decided on when patients are in an acute phase and under intense pressure. Therefore, the decision making process needs to be explored more, especially breast cancer patients with less education and low income need better assistance and more detailed explanation of their options