7 research outputs found

    Mucosal Adjuvant Properties of the Shigella Invasin Complex

    No full text
    The Shigella invasin complex (Invaplex) is an effective mucosal vaccine capable of protecting against Shigella challenge in animal models. The major antigenic constituents of Invaplex are the Ipa proteins and lipopolysaccharide. The cell-binding capacity of the Ipa proteins prompted the investigation into the adjuvanticity of Invaplex. Using ovalbumin (OVA) as a model antigen, intranasal immunization with OVA combined with Invaplex was found to enhance anti-OVA serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA responses and induce OVA-specific mucosal antibody responses at sites located both proximal and distal to the immunization site. The immune responses induced with OVA and Invaplex were comparable in both magnitude and duration to the immune responses induced after immunization with OVA and cholera toxin. The OVA-specific immune response was characterized by high levels of serum IgG1 and increased production of interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, or IL-10 from lymphoid cells of immunized animals, suggesting a Th2 response. In addition to enhancing the immunogenicity of OVA, Invaplex-specific immune responses were also induced, indicating the potential for the development of a combination vaccine consisting of Invaplex and other immunogens. Preexisting Invaplex-specific immunity did not interfere with the capacity to enhance the immunogenicity of a second, unrelated vaccine antigen, suggesting that Invaplex could be used as a mucosal adjuvant in multiple vaccine regimens

    From Concept to Clinical Product: A Brief History of the Novel <i>Shigella</i> Invaplex Vaccine’s Refinement and Evolution

    No full text
    The Shigella invasin complex or Invaplex vaccine is a unique subunit approach to generate a protective immune response. Invaplex is a large, macromolecular complex consisting of the major Shigella antigens: lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and the invasion plasmid antigen (Ipa) proteins B and C. Over the past several decades, the vaccine has progressed from initial observations through pre-clinical studies to cGMP manufacture and clinical evaluations. The Invaplex product maintains unique biological properties associated with the invasiveness of virulent shigellae and also presents both serotype-specific epitopes, as well as highly conserved invasin protein epitopes, to the immunized host. The vaccine product has evolved from a native product isolated from wild-type shigellae (native Invaplex) to a more defined vaccine produced from purified LPS and recombinant IpaB and IpaC (artificial Invaplex). Each successive “generation” of the vaccine is derived from earlier versions, resulting in improved immunogenicity, homogeneity and effectiveness. The current vaccine, detoxified artificial Invaplex (InvaplexAR-Detox), was developed for parenteral administration by incorporating LPS with under-acylated lipid A. InvaplexAR-Detox has demonstrated an excellent safety and immunogenicity profile in initial clinical studies and is advancing toward evaluations in the target populations of children and travelers to endemic countries

    From Concept to Clinical Product: A Brief History of the Novel Shigella Invaplex Vaccine&rsquo;s Refinement and Evolution

    No full text
    The Shigella invasin complex or Invaplex vaccine is a unique subunit approach to generate a protective immune response. Invaplex is a large, macromolecular complex consisting of the major Shigella antigens: lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and the invasion plasmid antigen (Ipa) proteins B and C. Over the past several decades, the vaccine has progressed from initial observations through pre-clinical studies to cGMP manufacture and clinical evaluations. The Invaplex product maintains unique biological properties associated with the invasiveness of virulent shigellae and also presents both serotype-specific epitopes, as well as highly conserved invasin protein epitopes, to the immunized host. The vaccine product has evolved from a native product isolated from wild-type shigellae (native Invaplex) to a more defined vaccine produced from purified LPS and recombinant IpaB and IpaC (artificial Invaplex). Each successive &ldquo;generation&rdquo; of the vaccine is derived from earlier versions, resulting in improved immunogenicity, homogeneity and effectiveness. The current vaccine, detoxified artificial Invaplex (InvaplexAR-Detox), was developed for parenteral administration by incorporating LPS with under-acylated lipid A. InvaplexAR-Detox has demonstrated an excellent safety and immunogenicity profile in initial clinical studies and is advancing toward evaluations in the target populations of children and travelers to endemic countries

    Mucosal Adjuvanticity of a Shigella Invasin Complex with DNA-Based Vaccinesâ–ż

    No full text
    Protection against many infectious diseases may require the induction of cell-mediated and mucosal immunity. Immunization with plasmid DNA-based vaccines has successfully induced cell-mediated immune responses in small animals but is less potent in humans. Therefore, several methods are under investigation to augment DNA vaccine immunogenicity. In the current study, a mucosal adjuvant consisting of an invasin protein-lipopolysaccharide complex (Invaplex) isolated from Shigella spp. was evaluated as an adjuvant for DNA-based vaccines. Coadministration of plasmid DNA encoding the Orientia tsutsugamushi r56Karp protein with Invaplex resulted in enhanced cellular and humoral responses in intranasally immunized mice compared to immunization with DNA without adjuvant. Mucosal immunoglobulin A, directed to plasmid-encoded antigen, was detected in lung and intestinal compartments after Invaplex-DNA immunization followed by a protein booster. Moreover, immunization with Invaplex elicited Shigella-specific immune responses, highlighting its potential use in a combination vaccine strategy. The capacity of Invaplex to enhance the immunogenicity of plasmid-encoded genes suggested that Invaplex promoted the uptake and expression of the delivered genes. To better understand the native biological activities of Invaplex related to its adjuvanticity, interactions between Invaplex and mammalian cells were characterized. Invaplex rapidly bound to and was internalized by nonphagocytic, eukaryotic cells in an endocytic process dependent on actin polymerization and independent of microtubule formation. Invaplex also mediated transfection with several plasmid DNA constructs, which could be inhibited with monoclonal antibodies specific for IpaB and IpaC or Invaplex-specific polyclonal sera. The cellular binding and transport capabilities of Invaplex likely contribute to the adjuvanticity and immunogenicity of Invaplex

    Assembly, Biochemical Characterization, Immunogenicity, Adjuvanticity, and Efficacy of Shigella Artificial Invaplex

    No full text
    ABSTRACT The native Invaplex (InvaplexNAT) vaccine and adjuvant is an ion exchange-purified product derived from the water extract of virulent Shigella species. The key component of InvaplexNAT is a high-molecular-mass complex (HMMC) consisting of the Shigella lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and the invasin proteins IpaB and IpaC. To improve product purity and immunogenicity, artificial Invaplex (InvaplexAR) was developed using recombinant IpaB and IpaC proteins and purified Shigella LPS to assemble an HMMC consisting of all three components. Characterization of InvaplexAR by various methods demonstrated similar characteristics as the previously reported HMMC in InvaplexNAT. The well-defined InvaplexAR vaccine consistently contained greater quantities of IpaB, IpaC, and LPS than InvaplexNAT. InvaplexAR and InvaplexNAT immunogenicities were compared in mouse and guinea pig dose escalation studies. In both models, immunization induced antibody responses specific for InvaplexNAT and LPS while InvaplexAR induced markedly higher anti-IpaB and -IpaC serum IgG and IgA endpoint titers. In the murine model, homologous protection was achieved with 10-fold less InvaplexAR than InvaplexNAT and mice receiving InvaplexAR lost significantly less weight than mice receiving the same amount of InvaplexNAT. Moreover, mice immunized with InvaplexAR were protected from challenge with both homologous and heterologous Shigella serotypes. Guinea pigs receiving approximately 5-fold less InvaplexAR compared to cohorts immunized with InvaplexNAT were protected from ocular challenge. Furthermore, adjuvanticity previously attributed to InvaplexNAT was retained with InvaplexAR. The second-generation Shigella Invaplex vaccine, InvaplexAR, offers significant advantages over InvaplexNAT in reproducibility, flexible yet defined composition, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy. IMPORTANCE Shigella species are bacteria that cause severe diarrheal disease worldwide, primarily in young children. Treatment of shigellosis includes oral fluids and antibiotics, but the high burden of disease, increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance, and long-term health consequences clearly warrant the development of an effective vaccine. One Shigella vaccine under development is termed the invasin complex or Invaplex and is designed to drive an immune response to specific antigens of the bacteria in an effort to protect an individual from infection. The work presented here describes the production and evaluation of a new generation of Invaplex. The improved vaccine stimulates the production of antibodies in immunized mice and guinea pigs and protects these animals from Shigella infection. The next step in the product’s development will be to test the safety and immune response induced in humans immunized with Invaplex

    Safety and immunogenicity of an intranasal \u3ci\u3eShigella flexneri\u3c/i\u3e 2a Invaplex 50 vaccine

    Get PDF
    Background: Shigella flexneri 2a lipopolysaccharide 50 is a nasally delivered subunit vaccine consisting of a macromolecular complex composed of LPS, IpaB, IpaC and IpaD. The current study examined vaccine safety and immunogenicity across a dose range and the clinical performance of a new intranasal delivery device. Methods: Volunteers (N = 36) were randomized to receive vaccine via the DolphinTM (Valois of America, Congers, New York) intranasal spray device at one of three doses (240, 480, and 690 ÎĽg) on days 0, 14, and 28. Another group (N = 8) received the 240 ÎĽg dose via pipette. Vaccine safety was actively monitored and antigen-specific humoral and mucosal immune responses were determined. Results: There were no serious adverse events and the majority of adverse events (98%) were mild. Antibody secreting cells (ASC), plasma, and mucosal immune responses to Shigella antigens were detected at all three dose levels with the 690 ÎĽg dose inducing the highest magnitude and frequency of responses. Vaccination with comparable doses of Invaplex 50 via the DolphinTM resulted in higher plasma and ASC immune responses as compared to pipette delivery. Conclusion: In this trial the S. flexneri 2a Invaplex 50 vaccine was safe, well-tolerated and induced robust levels of antigen-specific intestinal IgA and ASC responses. The spray device performed well and offered an advantage over pipette intranasal delivery
    corecore