The relationship between cadence, pedalling technique and gross efficiency in cycling

Technique and energy saving are two variables often considered as important for performance in cycling and related to each other. Theoretically, excellent pedalling technique should give high gross efficiency (GE). The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between pedalling technique and GE. 10 well-trained cyclists were measured for GE, force effectiveness (FE) and dead centre size (DC) at a work rate corresponding to ~75% of VO2max during level and inclined cycling, seat adjusted forward and backward, at three different cadences around their own freely chosen cadence (FCC) on an ergometer. Within subjects, FE, DC and GE decreased as cadence increased (p < 0.001). A strong relationship between FE and GE was found, which was to great extent explained by FCC. The relationship between cadence and both FE and GE, within and between subjects, was very similar, irrespective of FCC. There was no difference between level and inclined cycling position. The seat adjustments did not affect FE, DC and GE or the relationship between them. Energy expenditure is strongly coupled to cadence, but force effectiveness, as a measure for pedalling technique, is not likely the cause of this relationship. FE, DC and GE are not affected by body orientation or seat adjustments, indicating that these parameters and the relationship between them are robust to coordinative challenges within a range of cadence, body orientation and seat position that is used in regular cycling

Influence of the contact time on coupling time and a simple method to measure coupling time

International audienceThe enhancement of performance in stretch shortening cycle (SSC) exercises has been attributed to the recoil of elastic energy stored during the stretching phase and depends on the duration of the coupling time (T(coupling)) i.e., the duration of the isometric phase occurring between the stretch and the shortening of the muscle. However, instead of T(coupling), the contact time (T(contact))--i.e., the sum of T(coupling) plus the duration of the stretching and shortening phases that precede and follow T(coupling)--is more easily and often measured. The aim of this study was to investigate the T(coupling) changes within a large range of T(contact), in order to propose a possible relationship between T(coupling) and T(contact), thus allowing the accurate measurement of T(coupling )only from a tachometer and force data obtained classically in vertical jumps, jumps on sledge apparatus and running on force treadmills. Eleven subjects performed SSC exercises on a sledge apparatus with a large range of T(contact) (400, 700, 1,000, 1,500, 2,000 and 2,500 ms). The T(coupling) and T(contact) values were measured individually, from force platform recordings and the velocity of the carriage seat obtained by a tachometer. For the longest T(contact) (i.e., from 850 to 2,500 ms), we observed a significant linear relationship between T(contact) and T(coupling). This transition between T(contact) shorter or longer than about 850 ms seems to be important and to correspond to T(coupling) close to 300 ms. This limit observed in the present study could be explained physiologically due to a possible modification of the cross-bridges formation

Effects of altered stride frequency and contact time on leg-spring behavior in human running

International audienceMany studies have demonstrated that contact time is a key factor affecting both the energetics and mechanics of running. The purpose of the present study was to further explore the relationships between contact time (t(c)), step frequency (f) and leg stiffness (k(leg)) in human running. Since f is a compound parameter, depending on both contact and aerial time, the specific goal of this study was to independently vary f and t(c) and to investigate their respective effects on spring-mass characteristics during running, seeking to determine if the changes in k(leg) observed when running at different f are mainly due to inherent changes in t(c). We compared three types of constant 3.33 m s(-1) running conditions in 10 male subjects: normal running at the subject's freely chosen f, running with decreased and increased f, and decreased and increased t(c) at the imposed freely chosen f. The data from the varied f trials showed that the variation of t(c) was strongly correlated to that of k(leg) (r(2)=0.90), and the variation of f was also significantly correlated to that of k(leg) (r(2)=0.47). Further, changes in t(c) obtained in various t(c) conditions were significantly correlated to changes in k(leg) (r(2)=0.96). These results confirm that leg stiffness was significantly influenced by step frequency variations during constant speed running, as earlier demonstrated, but our more novel finding is that compared to step frequency, the effect of contact time variations appears to be a stronger and more direct determinant of k(leg). Indeed, 90-96% of the variance in k(leg) can be explained by contact time, whether this latter parameter is directly controlled, or indirectly controlled through its close relationship with step frequency. In conclusion, from the comparison of two experimental procedures, i.e. imposing various step frequency conditions vs. asking subjects to intentionally vary contact time at their freely chosen step frequency, it appears that changes in leg stiffness are mainly related to changes in contact time, rather than to those in step frequency. Step frequency appears to be an indirect factor influencing leg stiffness, through its effect on contact time, which could be considered a major determinant of this spring-mass characteristic of human running