36 research outputs found

    Facial Cosmetics and Attractiveness: Comparing the Effect Sizes of Professionally-Applied Cosmetics and Identity

    Get PDF
    Forms of body decoration exist in all human cultures. However, in Western societies, women are more likely to engage in appearance modification, especially through the use of facial cosmetics. How effective are cosmetics at altering attractiveness? Previous research has hinted that the effect is not large, especially when compared to the variation in attractiveness observed between individuals due to differences in identity. In order to build a fuller understanding of how cosmetics and identity affect attractiveness, here we examine how professionally-applied cosmetics alter attractiveness and compare this effect with the variation in attractiveness observed between individuals. In Study 1, 33 YouTube models were rated for attractiveness before and after the application of professionally-applied cosmetics. Cosmetics explained a larger proportion of the variation in attractiveness compared with previous studies, but this effect remained smaller than variation caused by differences in attractiveness between individuals. Study 2 replicated the results of the first study with a sample of 45 supermodels, with the aim of examining the effect of cosmetics in a sample of faces with low variation in attractiveness between individuals. While the effect size of cosmetics was generally large, between-person variability due to identity remained larger. Both studies also found interactions between cosmetics and identity-more attractive models received smaller increases when cosmetics were worn. Overall, we show that professionally- applied cosmetics produce a larger effect than self-applied cosmetics, an important theoretical consideration for the field. However, the effect of individual differences in facial appearance is ultimately more important in perceptions of attractiveness

    Assessment of the current levels of <sup>241</sup>Am и <sup>137</sup>Сs in soils and foodstuff, as well as of public internal exposure to ionizing radiation in populated areas adjacent to the Chernobyl NPP exclusion zone (case study: the Bragin district of the Gomel region, Belarus)

    No full text
    This paper is part of a research cycle focusing on studying the current levels of  241Am and 137Cs in soils and local foodstuffs of populated areas neighboring the Chernobyl exclusion zone. Our objective was to estimate the maximum annual committed internal doses to individuals of the Bragin-area settlements from inhalation and consumption of locally produced foods. We updated the data on the levels of  241Am and 137Сs in soils of 28 settlements of the district. Specific activity of  241Am in soils in two of the settlements were the highest of all; we took and analyzed samples of local-grown foodstuff.  241Am in food samples was measured via a radiochemical method with the use of selective chromatographic resins and alpha-spectrometry measurement. A gammaspectrometry technique was used to measure  241Am in soil and 137Сs in soil and food samples. The most contaminated by  241Am and 137Cs appeared the soils in the town of Bragin, the administrative center of the district where the respective levels were as high as 2.8 and 560 kBq/m2. Among the analyzed samples, the specific activities of  241Am in root and tuber crops were one-digit values, while the samples of leafy vegetables contained a few tens of mBq/kg of the same radionuclide. That said, however,  241Am concentrations in food samples were lower than those of 137Сs by three orders of magnitude. The results showed an apparent difference between estimated annual committed internal doses to the Bragin residents due to  241Am intake and that resulting from 137Сs with the respective 0.03 and 1.7 mSv/year. The maximum doses to population of the Bragin-district villages from inhalation of  241Am varied from 0.006 to 0.033 mSv/year exceeding the doses from inhaled 137Сs – 0.0002-0.002 mSv/year – by one order of magnitude. The major contribution to the public internal exposure today is 137Сs intake through consumption of contaminated food that produced locally; its contribution is about 93-99% of the total internal dose received by the Bragin-district residents

    Social and medical risk factors associated with supportive needs in the first year following localized prostate cancer treatment.

    No full text
    PURPOSE: Individuals who completed treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) often report poor coping and practical concerns when adapting to new roles in their lives-and strong patient-provider communication is critical for this period. However, there is limited research identifying factors associated with supportive needs after the completion of PCa treatment. This study aimed to identify the social and medical risk factors associated with supportive needs for adapting among individuals who completed treatment for localized PCa. METHODS: Using baseline data from a study evaluating a web-based support system for patients in the first year following treatment for localized PCa, self-efficacy for re-entry (e.g., maintaining relationships, symptom management), medical interactions, and practical concerns (e.g., insurance, exercise) were assessed. Multivariable regression analyses were completed to identify risk factors for low readiness. RESULTS: Participants (N = 431) with lower health literacy or income or with depressive symptoms had lower self-efficacy for re-entry, more negative interactions with medical providers, and more practical concerns (ps \u3c .05). Lastly, non-Hispanic White participants reported greater readiness compared with all other races (ps \u3c .05). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple social and medical risk factors are associated with greater supportive needs when adapting to new roles after PCa treatment. Understanding the risk factors for supportive needs in this period is critical. Future research is needed to help providers identify and support individuals at risk for poorer coping and greater practical concerns after treatment completion. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Identifying individuals with greater supportive needs following treatment for localized PCa treatment will help ensure successful adaptation to new roles

    Adoption, reach, and implementation of a cancer education intervention in African American churches

    Get PDF
    Use of technology is increasing in health promotion and has continued growth potential in intervention research. Guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, this paper reports on the adoption, reach, and implementation of Project HEAL (Health through Early Awareness and Learning)—a community-based implementation trial of a cancer educational intervention in 14 African American churches. We compare adoption, reach, and implementation at the organizational and participant level for churches in which lay peer community health advisors (CHAs) were trained using traditional classroom didactic methods compared with a new online system. Fifteen churches were randomized to one of two study groups in which two CHAs per church were trained through either classroom (“Traditional”; n = 16 CHAs in 8 churches) or web-based (“Technology”; n = 14 CHAs in 7 churches) training methods. Once trained and certified, all CHAs conducted a series of three group educational workshops in their churches on cancer early detection (breast, prostate, and colorectal). Adoption, reach, and implementation were assessed using multiple data sources including church-level data, participant engagement in the workshops, and study staff observations of CHA performance. The project had a 41% overall adoption rate at the church level. In terms of reach, a total of 375 participants enrolled in Project HEAL—226 participants in the Traditional group (43% reach) and 149 in the Technology group (21% reach; p  .05). Overall, the Project HEAL intervention had reasonable adoption, though reach could have been better. Implementation was strong across both study groups, suggesting the promise of using web-based methods to disseminate and implement evidence-based interventions in faith-based settings and other areas where community health educators work to eliminate health disparities.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0566-

    Prostate Cancer Patients’ Understanding of the Gleason Scoring System: Implications for Shared Decision-Making

    Get PDF
    © 2018 American Association for Cancer Education The Gleason scoring system is a key component of a prostate cancer diagnosis, since it indicates disease aggressiveness. It also serves as a risk communication tool that facilitates shared treatment decision-making. However, the system is highly complex and therefore difficult to communicate: factors which have been shown to undermine well-informed and high-quality shared treatment decision-making. To systematically explore prostate cancer patients’ understanding of the Gleason scoring system (GSS), we assessed knowledge and perceived importance among men who had completed treatment (N = 50). Patients were administered a survey that assessed patient knowledge and patients’ perceived importance of the GSS, as well as demographics, medical factors (e.g., Gleason score at diagnosis), and health literacy. Bivariate analyses were conducted to identify associations with patient knowledge and perceived importance of the GSS. The sample was generally well-educated (48% with a bachelor’s degree or higher) and health literate (M = 12.9, SD = 2.2, range = 3–15). Despite this, patient knowledge of the GSS was low (M = 1.8, SD = 1.4, range = 1–4). Patients’ understanding of the importance of the GSS was moderate (M = 2.8, SD = 1.0, range = 0–4) and was positively associated with GSS knowledge (p \u3c .01). Additionally, GSS knowledge was negatively associated with years since biopsy (p \u3c .05). Age and health literacy were positively associated with patients’ perceived importance of the GSS (p \u3c .05), but not with GSS knowledge. Patient knowledge is thus less than optimal and would benefit from enhanced communication to maximize shared treatment decision-making. Future studies are needed to explore the potential utility of a simplified Gleason grading system and improved patient-provider communication
    corecore