Development of the lateral ventricular choroid plexus in a marsupial, Monodelphis domestica

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Choroid plexus epithelial cells are the site of blood/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier and regulate molecular transfer between the two compartments. Their mitotic activity in the adult is low. During development, the pattern of growth and timing of acquisition of functional properties of plexus epithelium are not known.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Numbers and size of choroid plexus epithelial cells and their nuclei were counted and measured in the lateral ventricular plexus from the first day of its appearance until adulthood. Newborn <it>Monodelphis </it>pups were injected with 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) at postnatal day 3 (P3), P4 and P5. Additional animals were injected at P63, P64 and P65. BrdU-immunopositive nuclei were counted and their position mapped in the plexus structure at different ages after injections. Double-labelling immunocytochemistry with antibodies to plasma protein identified post-mitotic cells involved in protein transfer.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Numbers of choroid plexus epithelial cells increased 10-fold between the time of birth and adulthood. In newborn pups each consecutive injection of BrdU labelled 20-40 of epithelial cells counted. After 3 injections, numbers of BrdU positive cells remained constant for at least 2 months. BrdU injections at an older age (P63, P64, P65) resulted in a smaller number of labelled plexus cells. Numbers of plexus cells immunopositive for both BrdU and plasma protein increased with age indicating that protein transferring properties are acquired post mitotically. Labelled nuclei were only detected on the dorsal arm of the plexus as it grows from the neuroependyma, moving along the structure in a 'conveyor belt' like fashion.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The present study established that lateral ventricular choroid plexus epithelial cells are born on the dorsal side of the structure only. Cells born in the first few days after choroid plexus differentiation from the neuroependyma remain present even two months later. Protein-transferring properties are acquired post-mitotically and relatively early in plexus development.</p

Fluids and barriers of the CNS: a historical viewpoint

Tracing the exact origins of modern science can be a difficult but rewarding pursuit. It is possible for the astute reader to follow the background of any subject through the many important surviving texts from the classical and ancient world. While empirical investigations have been described by many since the time of Aristotle and scientific methods have been employed since the Middle Ages, the beginnings of modern science are generally accepted to have originated during the 'scientific revolution' of the 16th and 17th centuries in Europe. The scientific method is so fundamental to modern science that some philosophers consider earlier investigations as 'pre-science'. Notwithstanding this, the insight that can be gained from the study of the beginnings of a subject can prove important in the understanding of work more recently completed. As this journal undergoes an expansion in focus and nomenclature from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) into all barriers of the central nervous system (CNS), this review traces the history of both the blood-CSF and blood-brain barriers from as early as it was possible to find references, to the time when modern concepts were established at the beginning of the 20th century

The biological significance of brain barrier mechanisms: help or hindrance in drug delivery to the central nervous system?

Barrier mechanisms in the brain are important for its normal functioning and development. Stability of the brain's internal environment, particularly with respect to its ionic composition, is a prerequisite for the fundamental basis of its function, namely transmission of nerve impulses. In addition, the appropriate and controlled supply of a wide range of nutrients such as glucose, amino acids, monocarboxylates, and vitamins is also essential for normal development and function. These are all cellular functions across the interfaces that separate the brain from the rest of the internal environment of the body. An essential morphological component of all but one of the barriers is the presence of specialized intercellular tight junctions between the cells comprising the interface: endothelial cells in the blood-brain barrier itself, cells of the arachnoid membrane, choroid plexus epithelial cells, and tanycytes (specialized glial cells) in the circumventricular organs. In the ependyma lining the cerebral ventricles in the adult brain, the cells are joined by gap junctions, which are not restrictive for intercellular movement of molecules. But in the developing brain, the forerunners of these cells form the neuroepithelium, which restricts exchange of all but the smallest molecules between cerebrospinal fluid and brain interstitial fluid because of the presence of strap junctions between the cells. The intercellular junctions in all these interfaces are the physical basis for their barrier properties. In the blood-brain barrier proper, this is combined with a paucity of vesicular transport that is a characteristic of other vascular beds. Without such a diffusional restrain, the cellular transport mechanisms in the barrier interfaces would be ineffective. Superimposed on these physical structures are physiological mechanisms as the cells of the interfaces contain various metabolic transporters and efflux pumps, often ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, that provide an important component of the barrier functions by either preventing entry of or expelling numerous molecules including toxins, drugs, and other xenobiotics. In this review, we summarize these influx and efflux mechanisms in normal developing and adult brain, as well as indicating their likely involvement in a wide range of neuropathologies. There have been extensive attempts to overcome the barrier mechanisms that prevent the entry of many drugs of therapeutic potential into the brain. We outline those that have been tried and discuss why they may so far have been largely unsuccessful. Currently, a promising approach appears to be focal, reversible disruption of the blood-brain barrier using focused ultrasound, but more work is required to evaluate the method before it can be tried in patients. Overall, our view is that much more fundamental knowledge of barrier mechanisms and development of new experimental methods will be required before drug targeting to the brain is likely to be a successful endeavor. In addition, such studies, if applied to brain pathologies such as stroke, trauma, or multiple sclerosis, will aid in defining the contribution of brain barrier pathology to these conditions, either causative or secondary

Species-specific transfer of plasma albumin from blood into different cerebrospinal fluid compartments in the fetal sheep.

1. The blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) transfer of endogenous sheep albumin and several exogenous species of albumin has been investigated in different CSF compartments of the immature fetal sheep brain, at an early stage of development (60 days gestation, term is 150 days) when the CSF concentration of total protein is high. 2. There were marked differences in the steady-state CSF/plasma ratios for all species of albumin (including endogenous sheep albumin) between different CSF compartments. Ratios measured in the cisterna magna were significantly higher than those in the dorsal subarachnoid space, which in turn were higher than those in the lateral ventricles. The ratios for endogenous sheep albumin were (%; mean +/- S.E.M.): lateral ventricle (LV), 4.0 +/- 0.03; dorsal subarachnoid (DSA), 6.1 +/- 1.0; cisterna magna (CM), 13.7 +/- 0.8. 3. Three hours after I.V. injection, the CSF/plasma ratios for bovine albumin (LV, 2.0 +/- 0.2; DSA, 2.4 +/- 0.1; CM, 7.2 +/- 0.7%) were significantly lower than the ratio for endogenous sheep albumin in all three compartments. The ratios for human albumin (LV, 0.7 +/- 0.2; DSA, 1.0 +/- 0.2; CM, 3.9 +/- 0.4%) were significantly lower than those for bovine albumin. 4. In all three CSF compartments, the endogenous sheep albumin ratios were higher than would be expected on the basis of transfer by passive mechanisms. Conversely, steady-state CSF/plasma ratios for [3H]sucrose and [14C]inulin were consistent with passive transfer, and there were no differences between the ratios for these markers measured in each of the three CSF regions. 5. Goat albumin and [35S]sheep albumin ratios were not significantly different, 5 h after injection, from the endogenous sheep albumin levels in each of the three CSF compartments. 6. It is concluded that in the 60-day-old fetal sheep, all of the endogenous albumin in CSF is derived from the plasma by a specific transfer mechanism that can distinguish between different species of the same protein. There is also some evidence of a small passive component of blood-CSF albumin transfer. 7. Immunocytochemical evidence suggests that the route of transfer from blood to CSF is transcellular, through the choroid plexus epithelial cells. 8. Regional variations in albumin ratios are probably due to differences in specific transfer into each CSF compartment. This is reflected in a differential immunocytochemical staining for albumin in choroid plexus epithelial cells from different regions of the brain. 9. The results are discussed in terms of differences in albumin amino acid sequences, structural homologies, and transfer by a specific transcellular mechanism

The rights and wrongs of blood-brain barrier permeability studies: A walk through 100 years of history.

Careful examination of relevant literature shows that many of the most cherished concepts of the blood-brain barrier are incorrect. These include an almost mythological belief in its immaturity that is unfortunately often equated with absence or at least leakiness in the embryo and fetus. The original concept of a blood-brain barrier is often attributed to Ehrlich; however, he did not accept that permeability of cerebral vessels was different from other organs. Goldmann is often credited with the first experiments showing dye (trypan blue) exclusion from the brain when injected systemically, but not when injected directly into it. Rarely cited are earlier experiments of Bouffard and of Franke who showed methylene blue and trypan red stained all tissues except the brain. The term &quot;blood-brain barrier&quot; &quot;Blut-Hirnschranke&quot; is often attributed to Lewandowsky, but it does not appear in his papers. The first person to use this term seems to be Stern in the early 1920s. Studies in embryos by Stern and colleagues, Weed and Wislocki showed results similar to those in adult animals. These were well-conducted experiments made a century ago, thus the persistence of a belief in barrier immaturity is puzzling. As discussed in this review, evidence for this belief, is of poor experimental quality, often misinterpreted and often not properly cited. The functional state of blood-brain barrier mechanisms in the fetus is an important biological phenomenon with implications for normal brain development. It is also important for clinicians to have proper evidence on which to advise pregnant women who may need to take medications for serious medical conditions. Beliefs in immaturity of the blood-brain barrier have held the field back for decades. Their history illustrates the importance of taking account of all the evidence and assessing its quality, rather than selecting papers that supports a preconceived notion or intuitive belief. This review attempts to right the wrongs. Based on careful translation of original papers, some published a century ago, as well as providing discussion of studies claiming to show barrier immaturity, we hope that readers will have evidence on which to base their own conclusions