Accelerated high-dose radiotherapy alone or combined with either concomitant or sequential chemotherapy; treatments of choice in patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Results of high-dose chemo-radiotherapy (CRT), using the treatment schedules of EORTC study 08972/22973 or radiotherapy (RT) alone were analyzed among all patients (pts) with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) treated with curative intent in our department from 1995–2004.</p> <p>Material</p> <p>Included are 131 pts with medically inoperable or with irresectable NSCLC (TNM stage I:15 pts, IIB:15 pts, IIIA:57 pts, IIIB:43 pts, X:1 pt).</p> <p>Treatment</p> <p>Group I: Concomitant CRT: 66 Gy/2.75 Gy/24 fractions (fx)/33 days combined with daily administration of cisplatin 6 mg/m²: 56 pts (standard).</p> <p>Group II: Sequential CRT: two courses of a 21-day schedule of chemotherapy (gemcitabin 1250 mg/m²d1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 d2) followed by 66 Gy/2.75 Gy/24 fx/33 days without daily cisplatin: 26 pts.</p> <p>Group III: RT: 66 Gy/2.75 Gy/24 fx/33 days or 60 Gy/3 Gy/20 fx/26 days: 49 pts.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The 1, 2, and 5 year actuarial overall survival (OS) were 46%, 24%, and 15%, respectively.</p> <p>At multivariate analysis the only factor with a significantly positive influence on OS was treatment with chemo-radiation (P = 0.024) (1-, 2-, and 5-yr OS 56%, 30% and 22% respectively). The incidence of local recurrence was 36%, the incidence of distant metastases 46%.</p> <p>Late complications grade 3 were seen in 21 pts and grade 4 in 4 patients. One patient had a lethal complication (oesophageal). For 32 patients insufficient data were available to assess late complications.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In this study we were able to reproduce the results of EORTC trial 08972/22973 in a non-selected patient population outside of the setting of a randomised trial. Radiotherapy (66 Gy/24 fx/33 days) combined with either concomitant daily low dose cisplatin or with two neo-adjuvant courses of gemcitabin and cisplatin are effective treatments for patients with locally advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. The concomitant schedule is also suitable for elderly people with co-morbidity.</p

Response of x-ray intensifying screens to scattered and primary radiation

The energy dependence of the luminance ratio due to scattered and primary radiation has been determined for four types of X-ray intensifying screens. A water phantom of 30 cm X 30 cm X 20 cm was used as the scattering medium. Ten narrow band X-ray spectra were used as incident radiation: the mean energies of these spectra ranged from 28 to 84 keV. Using the monoenergetic data, results were calculated for broad spectra and compared with measured results for broad spectra. For tube voltages up to 50 kV the calculated results agreed well with the measured results: for higher tube voltages a small difference occurre

A new method for microdensitometer slit length correction of radiographic noise power spectra

When the power spectrum of radiographic noise is estimated from scans obtained with a microdensitometer equipped with a rectangular slit, a bias is present due to the finite length of this slit. A method to correct for this bias was developed and was tested on both a simulated and a measured spectrum. No bias remains with our method, in situations where a conventional method shows a significantly biased result. Good agreement was found with the synthesized slit method, described by Sandrik and Wagne

A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy

Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy is a treatment modality that combines physical advantages of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with the radiobiological advantages of low dose rate brachytherapy. The aim of this review was to describe the effective clinical use of PDR brachytherapy worldwide in different tumour locations. We found 66 articles reporting on clinical PDR brachytherapy including the treatment procedure and outcome. Moreover, PDR brachytherapy has been applied in almost all tumour sites for which brachytherapy is indicated and with good local control and low toxicity. The main advantage of PDR is, because of the small pulse sizes used, the ability to spare normal tissue. In certain cases, HDR resembles PDR brachytherapy by the use of multifractionated low-fraction dos

Treatment of localized prostatic carcinoma using the transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal implantation technique

Treatment of localized prostate cancer by ultrasonically guided transperineal 125I implantation, in contrast to open 125I implantation, may allow for ideal distribution of the seeds and may therefore lead to better treatment results. 46 patients with localized prostatic carcinoma (T1-T2, G1-G3, N0, M0) have been treated since 1985, using this new technique. The longest follow-up is 64 months (median 30 months). The irradiation implantation dose to the prostate was 160 Gy. Assessed by ultrasonography an average prostate volume reduction of 20% was achieved at 6 months, increasing to 24% at 12 months, 39% at 24 months and 56% at 48 months. To evaluate response of the primary tumor systematic ultrasonically guided needle biopsies from the previous malignant prostate areas were performed in all patients every 6 months during follow-up. Tumor-negative biopsies were obtained in 33% of patients at 12 months, 40% at 24 months, progressively increasing to 50% at 48 months. Three patients developed distant metastases, and 6 died, of whom 1 patient due to prostate cancer. Morbidity from implantation has been low and the erectile function was preserved in all patients at 12 months postimplantation. The high percentage of tumor-positive biopsies during follow-up indicates that this technique fails to cure a significant proportion of patient

Office hours pulsed brachytherapy boost in breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiobiological studies suggest equivalent biological effects between continuous low dose rate brachytherapy (CLDR) and pulsed brachytherapy (PB) when pulses are applied without interruption every hour. However, radiation protection and institute-specific demands requested the design of a practical PB protocol substituting the CLDR boost in breast cancer patients. An office hours scheme was designed, considering the CLDR dose rate, the overall treatment time, pulse frequency and tissue repair characteristics. Radiobiological details are presented as well as the logistics and technical feasibility of the scheme after treatment of the first 100 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biologically effective doses (BEDs) were calculated according to the linear quadratic model for incomplete repair. Radiobiological parameters included an alpha/beta value of 3 Gy for normal tissue late effects and 10 Gy for early normal tissue or tumour effects. Tissue repair half-time ranged from 0.1 to 6 h. The reference CLDR dose rate of 0.80 Gy/h was obtained retrospectively from analysis of patients' data. The treatment procedure was evaluated with regard to variations in implant characteristics after treatment of 100 patients. RESULTS: A PB protocol was designed consisting of two treatment blocks separated by a night break. Dose delivery in PB was 20 Gy in two 10 Gy blocks and, for application of the 15 Gy boost, one 10 Gy block plus one 5 Gy block. The dose per pulse was 1.67 Gy, applied with a period time of approximately 1.5 h. An inter-patient variation of 30% (1 SD) was observed in the instantaneous source strength. Taking also the spread in implant size into account, the net variation in pulse duration amounted to 38%. CONCLUSION: An office hours PB boost regimen was designed for substitution of the CLDR boost in breast-conserving therapy on the basis of the BED. First treatment experience shows the office hour regimen to be convenient to the patients and no technical perturbations were encountere