239 research outputs found
The outlook for precipitation measurements from space
To provide useful precipitation measurements from space, two requirements must be met: adequate spatial and temporal sampling of the storm and sufficient accuracy in the estimate of precipitation intensity. Although presently no single instrument or method completely satisfies both requirements, the visible/IR, microwave radiometer and radar methods can be used in a complementary manner. Visible/IR instruments provide good temporal sampling and rain area depiction, but recourse must be made to microwave measurements for quantitative rainfall estimates. The inadequacy of microwave radiometer measurements over land suggests, in turn, the use of radar. Several recently developed attenuating-wavelength radar methods are discussed in terms of their accuracy, dynamic range and system implementation. Traditionally, the requirements of high resolution and adequate dynamic range led to fairly costly and complex radar systems. Some simplications and cost reduction can be made; however, by using K-band wavelengths which have the advantages of greater sensitivity at the low rain rates and higher resolution capabilities. Several recently proposed methods of this kind are reviewed in terms of accuracy and system implementation. Finally, an adaptive-pointing multi-sensor instrument is described that would exploit certain advantages of the IR, radiometric and radar methods
Recommended from our members
DCFPAK: Dose coefficient data file package for Sandia National Laboratory
The FORTRAN-based computer package DCFPAK (Dose Coefficient File Package) has been developed to provide electronic access to the dose coefficient data files summarized in Federal Guidance Reports 11 and 12. DCFPAK also provides access to standard information regarding decay chains and assembles dose coefficients for all dosimetrically significant radioactive progeny of a specified radionuclide. DCFPAK was designed for application on a PC but, with minor modifications, may be implemented on a UNIX workstation
Recommended from our members
On the use of age-specific effective dose coefficients in radiation protection of the public
Current radiation protection standards for the public include a limit on effective dose in any year for individuals in critical groups. This paper considers the question of how the annual dose limit should be applied in controlling routine exposures of populations consisting of individuals of all ages. The authors assume that the fundamental objective of radiation protection is limitation of lifetime risk and, therefore, that standards for controlling routine exposures of the public should provide a reasonable correspondence with lifetime risk, taking into account the age dependence of intakes and doses and the variety of radionuclides and exposure pathways of concern. Using new calculations of the per capita (population-averaged) risk of cancer mortality per unit activity inhaled or ingested in the US Environmental Protection Agency`s Federal Guidance Report No. 13, the authors show that applying a limit on annual effective dose only to adults, which was the usual practice in radiation protection of the public before the development of age-specific effective dose coefficients, provides a considerably better correspondence with lifetime risk than applying the annual dose limit to the critical group of any age
Recommended from our members
Experimental validation of Monte Carlo calculations for organ dose
The problem of validating estimates of absorbed dose due to photon energy deposition is examined. The computational approaches used for the estimation of the photon energy deposition is examined. The limited data for validation of these approaches is discussed and suggestions made as to how better validation information might be obtained. (ACR
In vivo biodistribution of 125IPIP and internal dosimetry of 123IPIP radioiodinated agents selective to the muscarinic acetylcholinergic receptor complex
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134943/1/mp8941.pd
Recommended from our members
Environmental acceptability of high-performance alternatives for depleted uranium penetrators
The Army`s environmental strategy for investigating material substitution and management is to measure system environmental gains/losses in all phases of the material management life cycle from cradle to grave. This study is the first in a series of new investigations, applying material life cycle concepts, to evaluate whether there are environmental benefits from increasing the use of tungsten as an alternative to depleted uranium (DU) in Kinetic Energy Penetrators (KEPs). Current military armor penetrators use DU and tungsten as base materials. Although DU alloys have provided the highest performance of any high-density alloy deployed against enemy heavy armor, its low-level radioactivity poses a number of environmental risks. These risks include exposures to the military and civilian population from inhalation, ingestion, and injection of particles. Depleted uranium is well known to be chemically toxic (kidney toxicity), and workplace exposure levels are based on its renal toxicity. Waste materials containing DU fragments are classified as low-level radioactive waste and are regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. These characteristics of DU do not preclude its use in KEPs. However, long-term management challenges associated with KEP deployment and improved public perceptions about environmental risks from military activities might be well served by a serious effort to identify, develop, and substitute alternative materials that meet performance objectives and involve fewer environmental risks. Tungsten, a leading candidate base material for KEPS, is potentially such a material because it is not radioactive. Tungsten is less well studied, however, with respect to health impacts and other environmental risks. The present study is designed to contribute to the understanding of the environmental behavior of tungsten by synthesizing available information that is relevant to its potential use as a penetrator
Recommended from our members
A Blood Circulation Model for Reference Man
A dynamic blood circulation model that predicts the movement and gradual dispersion of a bolus of material in the circulation after its intravenous injection into an adult human. The main purpose of the model is improve the dosimetry of internally deposited radionuclides that decay in the circulation to a significant extent. The model partitions the blood volume into 24 separate organs or tissues, right heart chamber, left heart chamber, pulmonary circulation, arterial outflow to the aorta and large arteries, and venous return via the large veins. Model results were compared to data obtained from injection of carbon 11 labeled carbon monoxide or rubidium 86
Π£Π»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π² Π¨Π²Π΅ΡΠΈΠΈ
In radiological diagnostics and therapy, it is important that practitioners, referrers, (i.e. radiologists, radiation oncologists and others in health-care) are aware of how much radiation a patient may receive from the various procedures used and associated health risk. The profession has a duty to inform patients or their representatives of the advantages and disadvantages of specific investigations or treatment plans. The need to estimate and communicate risks in connection with medical use of ionizing radiation is highlighted e.g. in the Russian Federation State Law No 3, Β§17.2,1996 and in the EU directive (2013/59/EURATOM 2014). The most commonly used way to express harm in relation to low doses of ionizing radiation is use of the quantity effective dose (E). Effective dose, a radiation protection quantity, however is not intended to provide risk estimates for medical exposures. Its purpose is to optimize conditions for radiation workers (18-65 years) or the general public; all groups with age distributions that differ from patients. In this paper the lifetime attributable risk was used to estimate the excess risk of receiving and dying of radiogenic cancer. The lifetime attributable risk estimations are generated from three different variables, gender, attained age and age at exposure giving the possibility to create age and gender specific cancer risk estimations. Initially, the US Environmental Protection Agency lifetime attributable risk coefficients which are intended to predict the cancer risk from ionizing radiation to a normal US population were applied. In this work, the lifetime attributable risk predictions were modified to the normal Swedish population and to cohorts of Swedish patients undergoing radiological and nuclear medicine examinations or treatments with survival times that differfrom the normal population. For Swedish males, all organs were given the same absorbed dose, exposed at 20, 40 and 70 years, the lifetime attributable risk coefficients (Gy-1) were 0.11, 0.068, and 0.038, respectively, which is lower than the corresponding figures for US males, 0.13, 0.077, and 0.040. For Swedish females, all organs were given the same absorbed dose, exposed at 40 years of age with a diagnosis of breast, colon or liver cancer, the lifetime attributable risk coefficients are 0.064, 0.034, and 0.0038, respectively, which is much lower than if a 40 years female without known cancer is exposed, 0.073.Π Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΉΠ½Π΅ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎΠ±Ρ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π» (Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠΈ-ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈ, Π»Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠΈ, ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ.) ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ» ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ ΡΡΠ° Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π° ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π°. ΠΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π» Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π·Π° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π°Ρ
ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊ, Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ, Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π² Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅ Π€Π-3 Β«Π ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΒ» Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π² Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π΅ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ·Π° 2013/59/EURATOM 2014. ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ΅Π΄Π° ΠΎΡ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ· ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Ρ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ, Ρ
ΠΎΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π² ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅, Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ΅ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π° (Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅ΠΉ Π² Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ 18β65Π»Π΅Ρ) ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ β Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏ Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ, ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΊΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ ΠΎΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ². Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π±ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
: ΠΏΠΎΠ», Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π° ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ°, ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΠ³Π΅Π½ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎ Π·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ Π‘Π¨Π, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈΠ·Π±ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π‘Π¨Π. Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΊΡΡΡΡ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π΄ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΡΠΆΡΠΈΠ½, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΠΈ ΡΡ ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Ρ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎ Π² Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ 20, 40 ΠΈ 70 Π»Π΅Ρ, ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° (ΠΡ-1) ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 0,11, 0,068, ΠΈ 0,038 ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΡΠΆΡΠΈΠ½ β 0,13, 0,077, ΠΈ 0,040 ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Ρ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎ Π² Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ 40 Π»Π΅Ρ Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° Π³ΡΡΠ΄ΠΈ, ΠΏΡΡΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° (ΠΡ-1) ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 0,064, 0,034, ΠΈ 0,0038 ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ 0,073 Π² ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ 40-Π»Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½, Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ· ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ Π½Π΅ Π±ΡΠ»
The Procedure for Determining and Quality Assurance Program for the Calculation of Dose Coefficients Using DCAL Software
The development of a spallation neutron source with a mercury target may lead to the production of rare radionuclides. The dose coefficients for many of these radionuclides have not yet been published. A collaboration of universities and national labs has taken on the task of calculating dose coefficients for the rare radionuclides using the software package: DCAL. The working group developed a procedure for calculating dose coefficients and a quality assurance (QA) program to verify the calculations completed. The first portion of this QA program was to verify that each participating group could independently reproduce the dose coefficients for a known set of radionuclides. The second effort was to divide the group of radionuclides among the independent participants in a manner that assured that each radionuclide would be redundantly and independently calculated. The final aspect of this program was to resolve any discrepancies arising among the participants as a group of the whole. The output of the various software programs for six QA radionuclides, 144Nd, 201Au, 50V, 61Co, 41Ar, and 38S were compared among all members of the working group. Initially, a few differences in outputs were identified. This exercise identified weaknesses in the procedure, which have since been revised. After the revisions, dose coefficients were calculated and compared to published dose coefficients with good agreement. The present efforts involve generating dose coefficients for the rare radionuclides anticipated to be produced from the spallation neutron source should a mercury target be employed
An Interdatabase Comparison of Nuclear Decay and Structure Data Utilized in the Calculation of Dose Coefficients for Radionuclides Produced in a Spallation Neutron Source
Internal and external dose coefficient values have been calculated for 14 anthropogenic radionuclides which are not currently presented in Federal Guidance Reports Nos. 11, 12, and 13 or Publications 68 and 72 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Internal dose coefficient values are reported for inhalation and ingestion of 1 ΞΌm and 5 ΞΌm AMAD particulates along with the f1 values and absorption types for the adult worker. Internal dose coefficient values are also reported for inhalation and ingestion of 1 ΞΌm AMAD particulates as well as the f1 values and absorption types for members of the public. Additionally, external dose coefficient values for air submersion, exposure to contaminated ground surface, and exposure to soil contaminated to an infinite depth are also presented. Information obtained from this study will be used to support the siting and permitting of future accelerator-driven nuclear initiatives within the U.S. Department of Energy complex, including the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) and Accelerator Production of Tritium (APT) Projects
- β¦