Sustaining chronic disease management in primary care: lessons from a demonstration project.

Chronic disease self-management (CDSM) programs have been found effective in improving clinical, behavioural, and self-efficacy outcomes associated with a range of chronic illnesses, and evidence suggests that CDSM is effective in reducing health care costs and health service utilisation. As the setting where most chronic disease is managed, primary health care is an ideal setting for supporting CDSM. This study aimed to explore the uptake and sustainability of CDSM within routine activities of primary health care clinicians involved in the implementation of a demonstration project within an Area Health Service in Sydney NSW. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with managers and clinicians involved in the project. Findings included (1) widespread support from participants for CDSM (2) participating clinicians thought that CDSM was valuable to themselves, their clients and the health system (3) the program required clients to be able to speak and understand English and so presented many barriers for implementation in CALD communities, and (4) the program was not effective in engaging some key members of the primary care team; in particular, general practitioners. The study highlights system design issues including communication and continuity of care between service providers, workforce supply and demands of acute care delivery in the community that will need to be addressed for sustainable and effective CDSM to be achieved

The role of nurses in preventing adverse events related to respiratory dysfunction: literature review

Aims. This paper reports a literature review examining the relationship between specific clinical indicators of respiratory dysfunction and adverse events, and exploring the role of nurses in preventing adverse events related to respiratory dysfunction.Background. Adverse events in hospital are associated with poor patient outcomes such as increased mortality and permanent disability. Many of these adverse events are preventable and are preceded by a period during which the patient exhibits clearly abnormal physiological signs. The role of nurses in preserving physiological safety by early recognition and correction of physiological abnormality is a key factor in preventing adverse events.Methods. A search of the Medline and CINAHL databases was conducted using the following terms: predictors of poor outcome, adverse events, mortality, cardiac arrest, emergency, oxygen, supplemental oxygen, oxygen therapy, oxygen saturation, oxygen delivery, assessment, patient assessment, physical assessment, dyspnoea, hypoxia, hypoxaemia, respiratory assessment, respiratory dysfunction, shortness of breath and pulse oximetry. The papers reviewed were research papers that demonstrated a relationship between adverse events and various clinical indicators of respiratory dysfunction.Results. Respiratory dysfunction is a known clinical antecedent of adverse events such as cardiac arrest, need for medical emergency team activation and unplanned intensive care unit admission. The presence of respiratory dysfunction prior to an adverse event is associated with increased mortality. The specific clinical indicators involved are alterations in respiratory rate, and the presence of dyspnoea, hypoxaemia and acidosis.Conclusions. The way in which nurses assess, document and use clinical indicators of respiratory dysfunction is influential in identifying patients at risk of an adverse event and preventing adverse events related to respiratory dysfunction. If such adverse events are to be prevented, nurses must not only be able to recognise and interpret signs of respiratory dysfunction, but must also take responsibility for initiating and evaluating interventions aimed at correcting respiratory dysfunction.<br /

Who, when and where? Identification of patients at risk of an in-hospital adverse event: Implications for nursing practice

Patients who suffer an adverse event (AE) are more likely to die or suffer permanent disability. Many AEs are preventable. Nurses have long played a pivotal role in the prevention of AEs. Much of the literature to date pertains to the role of nurses in the prevention of AEs such as falls, pressure areas and deep vein thrombosis. Prominent risk factors for AEs are the presence of physiological abnormality, failure to recognize or correct physiological abnormality, advanced patient age and location of patient room. Ongoing physiological assessment of patients is a nursing responsibility and the assessment findings of nurses underpin many patient care decisions. The early recognition and correction of physiological abnormality can improve patient outcomes by reducing the incidence of AEs, making nurses\u27 ability to identify, interpret and act on physiological abnormality a fundamental factor in AE prediction and prevention. This paper will examine the role of nurses in AE prevention, using cardiac arrest as an example, from the perspective of physiological safety; that is, accurate physiological assessment and the early correction of physiological abnormality.<br /