26 research outputs found

    Identification of the Functional Variant(s) that Explain the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor (<i>LDLR</i>) GWAS SNP rs6511720 Association with Lower LDL-C and Risk of CHD

    No full text
    <div><p>Background</p><p>The Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor (<i>LDLR</i>) SNP rs6511720 (G>T), located in intron-1 of the gene, has been identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) as being associated with lower plasma levels of LDL-C and a lower risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Whether or not rs6511720 is itself functional or a marker for a functional variant elsewhere in the gene is not known.</p><p>Methods</p><p>The association of <i>LDLR</i> SNP rs6511720 with incidence of CHD and levels of LDL-C was determined by reference to CARDIoGRAM, C4D and Global lipids genetics consortium (GLGC) data. SNP annotation databases were used to identify possible SNP function and prioritization. Luciferase reporter assays in the liver cell line Huh7 were used to measure the effect of variant genotype on gene expression. Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs) were used to identify the Transcription Factors (TFs) involved in gene expression regulation.</p><p>Results</p><p>The phenotype-genotype analysis showed that the rs6511720 minor allele is associated with lower level of LDL-C [beta = -0.2209, p = 3.85 x10<sup>-262</sup>], and lower risk of CHD [log (OR) = 0.1155, p = 1.04 x10<sup>-7</sup>]. Rs6511720 is in complete linkage. Rs6511720 is in complete linkage disequilibrium (LD) with three intron-1 SNPs (rs141787760, rs60173709, rs57217136). Luciferase reporter assays in Huh7 cells showed that the rare alleles of both rs6511720 and rs57217136 caused a significant increase in <i>LDLR</i> expression compared to the common alleles (+29% and +24%, respectively). Multiplex Competitor-EMSAs (MC-EMSA) identified that the transcription factor serum response element (SRE) binds to rs6511720, while retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) bind to rs57217136.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Both <i>LDLR</i> rs6511720 and rs57217136 are functional variants. Both these minor alleles create enhancer-binding protein sites for TFs and may contribute to increased <i>LDLR</i> expression, which is consequently associated with reduced LDL-C levels and 12% lower CHD risk.</p></div

    DNA binding properties of <i>LDLR</i> intron-1 SNPs.

    No full text
    <p>Conventional EMSA analysis of the <i>LDLR</i> intron-1 SNPs (rs6511720, rs141687760, rs60173709, and rs57217136). Binding of SREBP1 was used as the control (lane 1 and 2). The lanes with a labeled probe showed a specific band indicated by arrows, while when the unlabeled probe was added the band disappeared. These four SNPs have allele-specific binding, indicated by arrows. (-) = deletion and (*) = minor allele.</p

    <i>LDLR</i> luciferase constructs and SNP luciferase activity in Huh7 cell line.

    No full text
    <p>A) Schematic presentation of LDLR<b>-</b>luciferase-construct (promoter only) and LDLR<b>-</b>luciferase-enhancer-constructs. The constructs were transfected into Huh7 cells. B) Results of luciferase reporter assays showing relative expression of LDLR-luciferase-enhancer constructs of <i>LDLR</i> SNPs relative to the LDLR-luciferase (no enhancer) construct. (-) = deletion and (*) = minor allele.</p

    Genome-wide maps of chromatin state of LDLR intron-1.

    No full text
    <p>Schematic presentation of the LDLR intron-1 chromatin status (<a href="https://genome-euro.ucsc.edu" target="_blank">https://genome-euro.ucsc.edu</a>). The area of interest in intron-1 is highlighted in light-blue color. Promoter/ Enhancer histone marker of seven cell lines (GM12878, H1-hESC, HSMM, HUVEC, K562, NHEK, and NHLF). FAIRE: formaldehyde assisted isolation of regulatory elements.</p

    Demonstration of the Presence of the “Deleted” <i>MIR122</i> Gene in HepG2 Cells

    No full text
    <div><p>MicroRNA 122 (miR-122) is highly expressed in the liver where it influences diverse biological processes and pathways, including hepatitis C virus replication and metabolism of iron and cholesterol. It is processed from a long non-coding primary transcript (~7.5 kb) and the gene has two evolutionarily-conserved regions containing the pri-mir-122 promoter and pre-mir-122 hairpin region. Several groups reported that the widely-used hepatocytic cell line HepG2 had deficient expression of miR-122, previously ascribed to deletion of the pre-mir-122 stem-loop region. We aimed to characterise this deletion by direct sequencing of 6078 bp containing the pri-mir-122 promoter and pre-mir-122 stem-loop region in HepG2 and Huh-7, a control hepatocytic cell line reported to express miR-122, supported by sequence analysis of cloned genomic DNA. In contrast to previous findings, the entire sequence was present in both cell lines. Ten SNPs were heterozygous in HepG2 indicating that DNA was present in two copies. Three validation isolates of HepG2 were sequenced, showing identical genotype to the original in two, whereas the third was different. Investigation of promoter chromatin status by FAIRE showed that Huh-7 cells had 6.2 ± 0.19- and 2.7 ± 0.01- fold more accessible chromatin at the proximal (HNF4α-binding) and distal DR1 transcription factor sites, compared to HepG2 cells (p=0.03 and 0.001, respectively). This was substantiated by ENCODE genome annotations, which showed a DNAse I hypersensitive site in the pri-mir-122 promoter in Huh-7 that was absent in HepG2 cells. While the origin of the reported deletion is unclear, cell lines should be obtained from a reputable source and used at low passage number to avoid discrepant results. Deficiency of miR-122 expression in HepG2 cells may be related to a relative deficiency of accessible promoter chromatin in HepG2 versus Huh-7 cells.</p></div

    The “deleted” <i>MIR122</i> gene is present in two copies in HepG2 cells.

    No full text
    <p>A schematic diagram illustrates the human <i>MIR122</i> genomic locus. Li et al (2011) identified the pri-mir-122 promoter and the two DR-1 sites which were investigated by FAIRE in this study [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0122471#pone.0122471.ref014" target="_blank">14</a>]. The position of the pre-mir-122 stem-loop region, previously reported to be deleted in HepG2 cells, is indicated. FAIRE showed that Huh-7 cells had 6.2 ± 0.19- and 2.7 ± 0.01- fold more accessible chromatin at the DR1-1 (proximal) and DR1-2 (distal) sites than HepG2 (p = 0.03 and 0.001), respectively. The ENCODE DNase I hypersensitivity (DNAse HS, relative units; Duke University) annotations of <i>MIR122</i> are shown as density signals for Huh-7 and HepG2 [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0122471#pone.0122471.ref022" target="_blank">22</a>,<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0122471#pone.0122471.ref023" target="_blank">23</a>]. Consistent with the FAIRE results, these annotations showed a DNase I hypersensitivity site in the pri-mir-122 promoter in Huh-7 that was not seen in HepG2. The region was sequenced in 13 reactions (overlapping horizontal bars) and shown to be present in both Huh-7 and HepG2 cell lines (HepG2 isolates 1, 2 and 3). Ten SNPs spanning the region were heterozygous indicating that DNA was present in two copies. The positions of the miR-122 gene (upstream) and miR-122 gene (downstream) primers (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0122471#pone.0122471.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>) previously used to report the HepG2 <i>MIR122</i> “deletion” [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0122471#pone.0122471.ref009" target="_blank">9</a>] are indicated by arrowheads; the downstream primer was located within an AluJb repeat sequence. The widely-reported deficiency of miR-122 expression in HepG2 cells is not caused by a <i>MIR122</i> deletion, but may be related to a less accessible chromatin conformation in HepG2 than Huh-7 cells. Scale bar, 2kb.</p

    Cloned pre-mir-122 stem-loop region sequences from HepG2 DNA show two different haplotypes.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Cloned DNA sequences obtained after amplification with Taq polymerase. Two haplotypes (differently shaded) were observed for HepG2, consistent with the presence of two alleles across this region. However, among the eight HepG2 and Huh-7 clones, six sequence differences to the reference genome assembly were detected (*), so cloning was repeated using a proofreading DNA polymerase. (B) Cloned DNA sequences obtained after amplification with Phusion high fidelity DNA polymerase. Essentially the same two haplotypes of HepG2 were seen, but three novel single nucleotide substitution variants were detected and in a fourth clone, the rs9966765 allele did not correspond to the background haplotype observed. The reported error rate of Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (GC Buffer) is 9.5 x 10<sup>-7</sup> errors / base pair / PCR cycle (New England Biolabs). SNPs rs9966765 and rs1135519 are located upstream of the pre-mir-122 stem-loop region; their respective alleles are shown. The genomic positions on chromosome 18 (GRCh37/hg19 (Feb. 2009) human genome assembly) of non-SNP sequence variants and the alleles observed are shown; (T)<sub>n</sub> refers to the length (base pairs) of the polymorphic poly(T) tract. *, position showing a sequence variant not corresponding to the predominant haplotypes observed.</p

    Relative Expression of <i>PLA2G2A</i> mRNA in tissues from the ASAP study.

    No full text
    <p>This chart shows the relative expression of <i>PLA2G2A</i> mRNA across 5 tissues; liver, aorta intima-media, aorta adventitia, mammary artery intima-media and heart, in 223 patients undergoing aortic valve surgery in the Advanced Study of Aortic Pathology (ASAP) study.</p

    TaqMan Gene Expression Analysis for rs11573156 C and G.

    No full text
    <p>TaqMan gene expression assay results for rs11573156 C vs. rs11573156 G expression levels across <i>PLA2G2A</i> exon 1–2 and exon 5–6. The X axis scale represents ΔCt, the number of amplification cycles required to reach a pre-determined threshold of fluorescent signal. All samples were normalised to the housekeeping gene <i>GAPDH</i>.</p

    Luciferase Assay Activity Analysis Comparing rs3767221 T >G.

    No full text
    <p>The difference in luciferase activity (Relative Light Units) between the T and G alleles of rs3767221 (forward orientation), normalised to pGL3 expression vector. Rs3767221 G (rare) shows a 55% lower Luc activity compared to the T allele (wild type) and is compared to the promoter-free vector pGL3-Basic for baseline reference.</p
    corecore