7 research outputs found

    Integrated Continuous-Flow Production of Wax Esters Combining Whole-Cell and <i>In Vitro</i> Biocatalysis

    No full text
    A first-of-its-kind, fully continuous synthesis of wax esters from biobased precursors (glucose, fatty acids) was developed using metabolically engineered cells and in vitro enzyme catalysis. The cells, overexpressing fatty acyl-CoA reductase and xylose reductase, could be immobilized onto polyesters and packed in a continuous reactor. The immobilized cells were employed in the bioconversion, incorporating in situ extraction using dodecane as the solvent. Such extractive bioconversion was capable of producing fatty alcohols continuously at a productivity of 8.2 mg/(L·h). The immiscible aqueous-dodecane flow stream from the extractive bioconversion was then separated using an in-line membrane-based separator. The dodecane-rich phase was directed into an enzymatic reactor containing Novozyme 435 for the esterification of fatty alchols and fatty acids into the wax esters. A continuous production of wax esters (6.38–23.35 mg/(L·h)) was achieved as a result of the successful streamlining of the cascade biocatalytic process

    Regulation of Organic Hydroperoxide Stress Response by Two OhrR Homologs in <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>

    No full text
    <div><p><i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa ohrR</i> and <i>ospR</i> are gene homologs encoding oxidant sensing transcription regulators. OspR is known to regulate <i>gpx</i>, encoding a glutathione peroxidase, while OhrR regulates the expression of <i>ohr</i> that encodes an organic peroxide specific peroxiredoxin. Here, we show that <i>ospR</i> mediated <i>gpx</i> expression, like <i>ohrR</i> and <i>ohr</i>, specifically responds to organic hydroperoxides as compared to hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion. Furthermore, the regulation of these two systems is interconnected. OspR is able to functionally complement an <i>ohrR</i> mutant, i.e. it regulates <i>ohr</i> in an oxidant dependent manner. In an <i>ohrR</i> mutant, in which <i>ohr</i> is derepressed, the induction of <i>gpx</i> expression by organic hydroperoxide is reduced. Likewise, in an <i>ospR</i> mutant, where <i>gpx</i> expression is constitutively high, oxidant dependent induction of <i>ohr</i> expression is reduced. Moreover, <i>in vitro</i> binding assays show that OspR binds the <i>ohr</i> promoter, while OhrR binds the <i>gpx</i> promoter, albeit with lower affinity. The binding of OhrR to the <i>gpx</i> promoter may not be physiologically relevant; however, OspR is shown to mediate oxidant-inducible expression at both promoters. Interestingly, the mechanism of OspR-mediated, oxidant-dependent induction at the two promoters appears to be distinct. OspR required two conserved cysteines (C24 and C134) for oxidant-dependent induction of the <i>gpx</i> promoter, while only C24 is essential at the <i>ohr</i> promoter. Overall, this study illustrates possible connection between two regulatory switches in response to oxidative stress.</p></div

    Expression analysis of <i>gpx</i> and <i>ospR</i> in the presence of oxidants.

    No full text
    <p>Quantitative real-time PCR was performed to measure relative expression levels (2<sup>-ΔΔCt</sup>) of <i>gpx</i> (A) and <i>ospR</i> (B) in wild-type <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> with various oxidant treatments for 15 min. The uninduced sample was set to 1. UN, uninduced; CHP500, 500 μM CHP; tBOOH500, 500 μM tBOOH; LOOH100, 100 μM linoleic hydroperoxide; H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>500, 500 μM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>; H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>1000, 1000 μM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>; H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>4000, 4000 μM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>; MD50, 50 μM menadione; MD500, 500 μM menadione; PQ50, 50 μM paraquat; PQ100, 100 μM paraquat; PQ500, 500 μM paraquat. Significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05) between the treated samples and uninduced sample are denoted with asterisks.</p

    Mapping of the OspR binding sites on the <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa gpx</i> promoter region.

    No full text
    <p>Gel shift assay of purified OspR protein with various <i>gpx</i> promoter fragments. The concentrations of OspR protein added in the binding reactions are indicated above each lane. The unbound promoter fragment was designated p<sub>gpx</sub>, and the protein-DNA complex was designated p<sub>gpx</sub>-OspR.</p

    Regulation of <i>ohr</i> by OspR, the alteration of <i>ohr</i> expression in the <i>ospR</i> mutant and the alteration of <i>ospR</i> expression in the <i>ohrR</i> mutant.

    No full text
    <p>Quantitative real-time PCR was performed to measure relative expression levels (2<sup>-ΔΔCt</sup>) of <i>gpx</i> (A) and <i>ohr</i> (B) in various strains. (C) Expression of <i>gpx</i> in wild-type and <i>ohrR</i> mutant cultures treated with various concentrations of CHP (mM) for 15 min. (D) Expression of <i>ohr</i> in wild-type and <i>ospR</i> mutant cultures treated with various concentrations of CHP (mM) for 15 min. The expression in the wild-type strain was set to 1. Significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05) between samples are denoted with asterisks. For (C) and (D), means were compared between wild-type strain and mutant strain at the same condition.</p

    Gpx confers resistance to organic hydroperoxide and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Percent survival of exponential phase <i>P</i>. <i>aeruginosa ohr</i> mutant containing pGpx treated with 1 mM tBOOH in comparison to the wild-type and the <i>ohr</i> mutant. (B) Percent survival of exponential phase <i>P</i>. <i>aeruginosa katA</i> mutant containing pGpx treated with 2.5 mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in comparison to the wild-type and the <i>katA</i> mutant. Significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05) between samples are denoted with asterisks.</p

    Mapping of the OspR binding sites on the <i>P</i>. <i>aeruginosa gpx</i> (A) and <i>ohr</i> (B) promoter fragments by DNase I footprinting.

    No full text
    <p>PCR-generated probe fragments were labeled on one strand by end-labeling one of the primers with <sup>32</sup>P prior to amplification. The sequencing ladder (G, A, T, C) used to localize the binding sites on the promoters were generated using the promoter fragment itself as a template and the same labeled oligonucleotide as was used to generate the probe as a primer. Numbers above each lane indicate amounts of the OpsR and OhrR protein (μM) used in each reaction. The regions protected by OspR or OhrR are indicated by vertical lines. Hypersensitive site is indicated by asterisk.</p
    corecore