Data_Sheet_1.docx

<p>Self-positivity bias is one of the well-studied psychological phenomena, however, little is known about the bias in the specific dimension on social interaction, which we called herein interpersonal self-positivity bias—people tend to evaluate themselves more positively on social interactions, prefer to be included rather than to be excluded by others. In the present study, we used a modified self-reference task associated with N400 to verify such bias and explore whether impoverished social interaction (loneliness) could modulate it. Findings showed that exclusion verbs elicited larger N400 amplitudes than inclusion verbs, suggesting that most people have interpersonal self-positivity bias. However, loneliness was significantly correlated with N400 effect, showing those with high scores of loneliness had smaller differences in the N400 than those with lower scores. These findings indicated impoverished social interaction weakens interpersonal self-positivity bias; however, the underlying mechanisms need to be explored in future research.</p

Table1_3D-printed external fixation guide combined with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of flail chest: a technical report and case series.doc

BackgroundFlail chest is a common and serious traumatic condition in thoracic surgery. The treatment of flail chest often includes open reduction and internal fixation, which is relatively traumatic, complicated, and expensive. As three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is widely used in the clinical field, the application of 3D-printed products to chest trauma will become a new treatment option. To date, the use of 3D-printed external fixation guides for flail chests has not been reported. Thus, we aimed to assess the short-term efficacy of a new technology that treated flail chests with an individualized 3D-printed external fixation guide combined with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).Patients and methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on patients with flail chest treated with this new technique at our center from January 2020 to December 2022. The following parameters were included: operative time, thoracic tube extraction time, intensive care unit time, thoracic volume recovery rate, visual analog scale score 1 month postoperatively, and postoperative complication rate. All patients were followed up for at least 3 months.ResultsFive patients (mean age: 45.7 years) were enrolled; they successfully underwent surgery without chest wall deformity and quickly returned to daily life. The average number of rib fractures was 8.4; all patients had lung contusion, hemopneumothorax, and anomalous respiration. The abnormal breathing of all patients was completely corrected on postoperative day 1, and the chest wall was stable. One case experienced mild loosening of the 3D-printed guide postoperatively; however, the overall stability was not affected. The other four cases did not experience such loosening because we replaced the ordinary silk wire with a steel wire. All cases were discharged from the hospital 2 weeks postoperatively and returned to normal life 1 month after the removal of the 3D-printed guide on average. Only one case developed a superficial wound infection postoperatively, and no perioperative death occurred.ConclusionsThe 3D-printed external fixation guide combined with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is a novel technique in the treatment of flail chest and is safe, effective, feasible, and minimally invasive, with satisfactory clinical efficacy.</p

Task sequence of Experiment 1.

<p>Task sequence of Experiment 1.</p

Correlation of mean beta-values of lingual gyrus of NSI with the behavior accuracy of NSI.

<p>Correlation of mean beta-values of lingual gyrus of NSI with the behavior accuracy of NSI.</p

The neural activation in the contrast of NSI versus OSI (with a cluster-corrected threshold of <i>p</i><0.05, voxels≥34) in Experiment 1.

<p>The neural activation in the contrast of NSI versus OSI (with a cluster-corrected threshold of <i>p</i><0.05, voxels≥34) in Experiment 1.</p

Brain regions showing significant differences by comparisons of novel scientific innovation (NSI) versus old scientific innovation (OSI) conditions in Experiment 2.

<p>Brain regions showing significant differences by comparisons of novel scientific innovation (NSI) versus old scientific innovation (OSI) conditions in Experiment 2.</p

Task sequence of Experiment 2.

<p>Task sequence of Experiment 2.</p

Brain regions showing significant differences by comparisons between novel scientific innovation (NSI) and old scientific innovation (OSI) conditions in Experiment 1.

<p>Brain regions showing significant differences by comparisons between novel scientific innovation (NSI) and old scientific innovation (OSI) conditions in Experiment 1.</p

Examples of the statements used and responses made in session 1 of the Go/No-Go paradigm.

<p>Examples of the statements used and responses made in session 1 of the Go/No-Go paradigm.</p

Grand average LRPs on Go trials and No-Go trials.

<p>(a) Session 1. (b) Session 2.</p