6 research outputs found

    Can Wound Exudate from Venous Leg Ulcers Measure Wound Pain Status?: A Pilot Study

    No full text
    <div><p>We investigated the associations between the self-evaluated pain status and two pain biomarker candidates, nerve growth factor and S100A8/A9, in exudate from venous leg ulcer to finally develop an objective pain evaluation method. Patients with venous leg ulcer participated in this cross-sectional observational study conducted between April and October 2014 at two medical facilities. During routine wound care, each participant self-evaluated their pain status at each examination using the 10-point numerical rating scale (present pain intensity) and the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (continuous pain, intermittent pain, neuropathic pain, affective descriptors, and total score). Venous leg ulcer exudate sample was collected after wound cleansing. The nerve growth factor and S100A8/A9 concentrations in the venous leg ulcer exudate were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and standardized according to the wound area. The association between each pain status and the two standardized protein concentrations was evaluated using Spearmanā€™s correlation coefficient. In 30 sample collected from 13 participants, the standardized nerve growth factor concentration was negatively correlated with continuous pain (<i>Ļ</i> = -0.47, <i>P</i> = 0.01), intermittent pain (<i>Ļ</i> = -0.48, <i>P</i> = 0.01), neuropathic pain (<i>Ļ</i> = -0.51, <i>P</i> = 0.01), and total score (<i>Ļ</i> = -0.46, <i>P</i> = 0.01). The standardized S100A8/A9 concentration was positively correlated with present pain intensity (<i>Ļ</i> = 0.46, <i>P</i> = 0.03) and continuous pain (<i>Ļ</i> = 0.48, <i>P</i> = 0.03). Thus, these two proteins may be useful for objective evaluation of wound pain in venous leg ulcer patients.</p></div

    Changes in continuous pain intensity and standardized protein concentrations in ID ā€œGā€.

    No full text
    <p>The protein concentrations were standardized according to the wound area, and then the standardized S100A8/A9 concentration was multiplied 10-fold for clarity. The horizontal axis indicates the duration in weeks from the first examination. Numbers of NGF data were 9, and of S100A8/A9 were 7 in spite of 10 time points because NGF was not detected in one sample from observation number 8, and S100A8/A9 was not detected in samples from observation numbers 10, 12, and 16. NGF = nerve growth factor.</p
    corecore