10 research outputs found
Scatterplots depicting associations between total danger scores for faces and (A) scores on the RCMAS, and (B) scores on the RADS.
<p>Scatterplots depicting associations between total danger scores for faces and (A) scores on the RCMAS, and (B) scores on the RADS.</p
Correlates of threat attributions.
<p><i>Note</i>, <i>WASI</i>: Wechsler’s Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence; <i>RCMAS</i>: Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale; <i>RADS</i>: Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale; <i>SWLS</i>: Satisfaction With Life Scale.</p><p>*Denotes statistically significant, after applying Bonferroni correction.</p><p>Correlates of threat attributions.</p
Example of experimental design.
<p>Each screen consisted of a pair of pictures presented side by side for 3 seconds during encoding (Panel a). During recognition (Panel b), participants were asked to indicate whether they had seen the picture before. Due to the drift correction applied after each trial, the maximum length of the fixation crosshair varied between subjects. * indicates the minimum length of 1 second for each fixation crosshair presentation.</p
Eye-tracker and memory findings during encoding and recognition phases.
<p>Panels a and b represent fixation ratios and pupillary responses for targets, respectively. Panel c represents the memory accuracy for targets from each condition during recognition, and Panel d represents pupillary responses for targets during recognition. Bars represent one standard error of the mean (SEM).</p
Mediation of the effect of age on the memory positivity effect via pupillary responses.
<p>The numbers along the paths represent standardized regression coefficients. The coefficient below the path from age group to memory positivity represents the direct effect with no mediator in the model; the coefficient above the path represents the effect when pupillary dilation was included as a mediator.</p
Prospective memory accuracy as a function of emotional valence (Fig 1a); ongoing task accuracy (Fig 1b) and reaction time (Fig 1c) as a function of ongoing task phase (PM, no PM).
<p>Bars represent one standard error of the mean.</p
Mean affect and arousal ratings of prospective memory exemplars and cues.
<p>Mean affect and arousal ratings of prospective memory exemplars and cues.</p
Sagittal, coronal and axial activation t-maps in standard MNI space for both age groups in response to the gambling task.
<p>Sagittal, coronal and axial activation t-maps in standard MNI space for both age groups in response to the gambling task.</p
Between group analyses of activation in voxel-clusters in response to the gambling task.
<p>All coordinates Montreal Neurological Institute. Contrast thresholded with <i>p</i><.0001, and a 25-voxel extent threshold.</p